Impact of farming models on the reproductive performance and egg quality of Vietnamese local chicken breeds: Ho and Dong Tao

ISSN 2588-1299  
VJAS 2020; 3(1): 495-503  
Vietnam Journal of  
Agricultural  
Sciences  
Impact of Farming Models on the  
Reproductive Performance and Egg Quality  
of Vietnamese Local Chicken Breeds: Ho  
and Dong Tao  
Nguyen Van Duy1,2, Hoang Ngoc Mai1, Nguyen Dinh Tien1,  
Nguyen Thi Phuong1 & Vu Dinh Ton1  
1Faculty of Animal Science, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, 131000,  
Vietnam  
2Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, Liege 4000, Belgium  
Abstract  
The study was conducted from October 2016 to December 2017 at  
the Experimental Farm, Faculty of Animal Science, Vietnam  
National University of Agriculture, with the aim to evaluate the  
interaction between farming model types and reproductive  
performance of Ho and Dong Tao chickens. The two farming model  
types used in this research were (1) the traditional type – backyard  
and (2) the ameliorate type – battery cage. Data were collected from  
61 Ho hens and 61 Dong Tao hens continuously during 52 laying  
weeks. The total number of eggs laid by hens raised in battery cages  
averaged 88.47 eggs (for Ho hens) and 94.91 eggs (for Dong Tao  
hens), 35-38% higher than the number of eggs laid by hens raised in  
a traditional model. The FCR index per 10 eggs laid in battery cages  
was significantly lower than that in the back-yard model (P< 0.001).  
In both the Ho and Dong Tao breeds, the rate between the number of  
embryonated eggs by number of incubated eggs recorded in the  
ameliorate model was higher than that recorded in the traditional  
model (P< 0.01 for Ho chickens, P< 0.001 for Dong Tao). The weight  
of eggs produced by hens raised in battery cages was higher than eggs  
laid by free-range hens for both Ho and Dong Tao chickens (P< 0.01).  
As such, the reproductive performances and egg quality of both Ho  
and Dong Tao breeds were apparently improved when chickens were  
raised in battery cages.  
Keywords  
Received: January 2, 2019  
Accepted: June 2, 2019  
Battery cage models, farming, indigenous chicken, systems  
traditional, Dong Tao chicken, Ho chicken  
Correspondence to  
Introduction  
ORCID  
Vu Dinh Ton  
Chicken farming in Vietnam has been actively transformed in  
recent decades, leading to a significant improvement in meat and egg  
495  
Impact of Farming Models on the Reproductive Performance and Egg Quality of Vietnamese Local Chicken Breeds  
consists of more than 1,000 Dong Tao chicken  
households, totaling nearly 10,000 individuals.  
Of these, only about 20 farms have a flock size  
exceeding 50 hens per household (Dao Thi Hiep,  
2013). The population of Ho chickens is very  
small, with only 1,404 individuals distributed  
among 88 households (Bui Huu Doan & Nguyen  
Van Luu, 2006).  
performance. Many chicken breeds with high  
potential have been implemented in the country.  
Chicken farming systems have been also  
mechanized and well-constructed with feeding  
and drinking systems, light control, and sewage  
treatment systems. The influence of farming  
models on egg productivity and quality has  
previously been published. In detail, caged hens  
were shown to produce higher numbers of eggs  
in comparison with eggs laid by cage-free hens;  
however, a high population density of chickens  
raised in cages conclusively caused symptoms of  
stress in chickens, possibly leading to reductions  
of productivity and disease resistance (Özbey &  
Esen, 2007). Chicken genotypes and cage  
construction styles were reported to affect egg  
weight, yolk weight, and shell weight (P< 0.01)  
(Tůmová et al., 2011).  
The fact that Ho and Dong Tao chickens  
have low reproductive performances while being  
raised in a traditional-style farming model  
generates an interest in alternative farming  
models to enhance egg productivity. For this  
reason, this project aims to compare the impact  
of a traditional farming model and a battery-cage  
system on the reproductive performance and egg  
quality of Ho and Dong Tao chickens.  
The genetic sources of Vietnamese local  
chickens are diverse (Berthouly et al., 2009).  
Traditionally, Vietnamese local chicken breeds  
were named after their original village or their  
typical appearance. In Vietnam, there are about  
21 local chicken breeds (MARD, 2016). The  
backyard farming model has been implemented  
by up to 92% of all chicken farming households  
(FAO, 2008), covering 84-85% of farming  
households in North Eastern and North Western  
Vietnam (Lan Phuong et al., 2015).  
Materials and Methods  
This research was conducted from October  
2016 to December 2017 at the experimental farm  
of the Faculty of Animal Science, Vietnam  
National University of Agriculture in Hanoi  
(Vietnam). Hanoi is located at the latitude of  
21°0278’ North and at the longitude of 105°  
8432’ East. The weather is sub-tropical, and the  
total sunshine time is about 1075.2 hours during  
the year. Average monthly temperatures range  
from 25.1°C in June to 18.1°C in December.  
Average annual humidity is about 76.6%, with  
the highest (84%) in March and the lowest (70%)  
in December (GSO, 2018). The project contained  
two parallel supervisions of Ho and Dong Tao  
chickens. In this research, qualitative and  
quantitative criteria showing reproductivity and  
egg quality were recorded continuously during  
the 52 weeks of the laying period. The quality of  
the eggs was evaluated in terms of weight,  
length, width, and the egg shape index.  
Ho and Dong Tao chickens belong to the  
most important local chicken breeds in Vietnam  
because of their first-class meat quality,  
historically regarded as traditional delicacies for  
the king (FAO, 2008). Ho chicken originates  
from Ho village, Thuan Thanh district, Bac Ninh  
province in Northern Vietnam, and features  
typical morphological characteristics, including  
a massive body size and diversified feather colors  
(Nguyen Van Duy et al., 2015). Meanwhile,  
Dong Tao chicken originates from Dong Tao  
village, Khoai Chau district, Hung Yen province  
in Northern Vietnam, and is characterized by  
enlarged feet, massive body size, and large  
feather-color diversity (Nguyen Van Duy et al.,  
2017). In general, Ho and Dong Tao chicken  
farming are practised mostly at a small farming  
scale and not under the management of local  
authorities (Ngo Thi Kim Cuc, 2010; Pham et al.,  
2013). The population of Dong Tao chickens  
Egg productivity and quality  
The criteria of egg productivity were  
investigated on 122 Ho and Dong Tao hens (61  
hens/breed: 25 hens in a traditional backyard  
system and 36 hens in a battery cage model). The  
hens were settled in two different farming model  
types 15-20 days before laying their first egg.  
The traditional farming model was constructed  
with a simple chicken house, a soil-made playing  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
496  
Nguyen Van Duy et al. (2020)  
yard for chickens at a density of 01 chicken/m2,  
an appropriate design for natural light, was  
equipped with rain covers and rice-husks spread  
on the floor, and was surrounded by shade trees.  
For experimental purposes, in each of flocks, a  
cock was maintained to create a “family” at the  
rate of 5 hens/1 cock. Alternatively, the second  
experimental farming model included a multi-  
cell battery cage (cell dimensions: length x width  
x height = 40 x 65 x 38cm). The caging blocks  
were kept at a distance of 60cm above the  
ground. Each cell had a separate door tagged with  
a number corresponding to a wing code. The hens  
were illuminated for 16 hours per day and the  
hens were inseminated artificially every two days  
using 0.05mL semen doses.  
Average weight was calculated based on the  
weight of every egg during the 52 laying weeks.  
Each egg’s length and width were measured in  
the same way, using electronic sliders with a  
±0.01mm accuracy. The shape index was  
calculated to be equal to the ratio of the length  
and width. All qualified eggs were incubated  
using an automatic multi-period electric  
incubator with a maximum capacity of 500 eggs.  
The embryonic status was checked after 7 days  
of incubation by screening under direct white  
light. The number of embryonated eggs, new-  
born chicks, and deformed new-born chicks were  
recorded. The ratio of embryonated eggs/total  
incubated eggs and new-born chicks/total  
embryonated eggs were calculated in detail.  
In both experimental farming models, all the  
hens were provided enough drinking water and  
fed comfortably with the same diet (Table 1).  
Reproductive performance was tested for 52  
weeks after the first-egg laying age. Qualified  
eggs were collected every day and stored at room  
temperature. Among those, eggs collected on  
Monday and Tuesday were qualified and  
quantified every Wednesday. Good eggs  
collected on the other days were hatched.  
Abnormal eggs (eg. cracked, ruptured, unshelled,  
etc.) were eliminated.  
Statistical analysis  
The data were analyzed using with SAS 9.1.  
the MEANS procedure was used to calculate  
means and standard errors (SE). The ANOVA  
procedure was used to test the differences  
between means of the two farming models with  
the significance level set at P< 0.05.  
Results  
Reproductive traits and egg production  
The data on laying percentage of Ho and  
Dong Tao chickens is shown in Figure 1.  
Generally, the laying rate of Ho and Dong Tao  
Eggs were weighed individually using an  
electronic balance with a ±0.01g accuracy.  
Table 1. Ingredients and nutritive composition of the diet for the laying hens  
Ingredients  
Corn  
Proportion (%)  
34.00  
Concentrated feed1  
Rice bran  
16.50  
16.00  
Paddy  
33.00  
Premix Mineral –vitamins2  
0.50  
Nutritive composition of the diet (g kg-1)  
Crude protein (CP)  
Fat content  
142.5  
53.46  
6.50  
Calcium  
Phosphorus  
5.90  
Fiber  
42.21  
3030.12  
Metabolizable energy (kcal kg-1)  
Note: 1 Protein-rich feed, crude protein 45%; 2 vitamin A: 3 000 000 UI kg-1, vitamin D3: 30 000 UI kg-1, vitamin E: 100 mg kg-1  
497  
Impact of Farming Models on the Reproductive Performance and Egg Quality of Vietnamese Local Chicken Breeds  
chickens is shown in Figure 1. Generally, the  
laying rate of Ho and Dong Tao chickens was  
low. The laying rate of Ho hens was lower than  
that of Dong Tao hens. The laying rate of these  
two breeds varied by about 20%.  
analyses in Tables 2 and 3 revealed an apparent  
disparity in feed consumption for hens raised in  
battery cages compared to hens raised in a  
traditional style, with the domination belonging  
to the earlier group.  
The influence of the farming model type on  
the reproductive performance of Ho and Dong  
Tao chickens is analyzed in Tables 2 and 3. In  
both experimental breeds, almost all the  
remarkable indicators of egg productivity  
showed considerable relationships with the  
farming model types.  
The egg hatchability criteria also showed a  
tight correlation with the farming model types.  
Concretely, the number of qualified eggs for  
incubation, number of embryonated eggs,  
embryonated eggs/incubated eggs ratio, and  
hatched eggs/incubated eggs ratio were  
significantly correlated with the farming model  
types in both Ho and Dong Tao breeds (P< 0.01;  
P< 0.001) (Tables 4 and 5). The embryonated  
eggs/incubated eggs ratio of eggs laid by hens  
in a ameliorate farming model type was higher  
than those of the hens raised in traditional type  
by about 13% for Ho chickens and 18% for  
Dong Tao.  
The production yield during the 52 laying  
weeks of Ho hens raised in battery cages was  
88.47 eggs on average, which was 35% higher  
than the number of eggs laid by Ho hens freely  
released in a traditional farming model (P< 0.05,  
Table 2). Meanwhile, egg productivity of Dong  
Tao hens raised in battery cages during the 52  
laying weeks was 94.91 eggs on average, which  
was 38% higher than the number of eggs laid by  
hens raised in a conventional model (P< 0.05,  
Table 3). The amount of feed consumed by the  
hens per day, the feed consumption for 52 weeks,  
the feed conversion ratio to produce 10 eggs, and  
the FCR were significantly correlated with the  
flock type in both Ho and Dong Tao breeds. Data  
Similarly,  
the  
ratio  
of  
hatched  
eggs/incubated eggs was very different between  
the two farming model types with the dominance  
belonging to the hens raised in battery cages (P<  
0.001). On the contrary, there were no  
differences between the two farming model types  
in the hatched eggs/fertile eggs ratio and chick  
malformation ratio for the two chicken breeds.  
Figure 1. Laying percentage of Ho and Dong Tao chickens in the battery cage model by weeks  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
498  
Nguyen Van Duy et al. (2020)  
Table 2. Laying performance and feed consumption of Ho hens by farming model types  
Battery cage model  
Criteria  
Traditional model  
P
n1  
Means ± SE  
n2  
Means ± SE  
Total number of eggs in 52 weeks of  
laying (eggs)  
36  
88.47 ± 3.87  
5
65.52 ± 8.23  
*
Feed consumption per hen per day (g)  
36  
36  
105.97 ± 0.71  
38.57 ± 0.25  
5
5
97.32 ± 1.84  
35.42 ± 0.67  
***  
***  
Feed consumption per hen in 52 weeks  
of laying (kg)  
Feed conversion ratio (FCR/10 eggs)  
(kg)  
36  
4.36 ± 0.03  
5
5.40 ± 0.10  
***  
Note: (n1): number of hens; (n2): number of blocks *** P<0.001; * P< 0.05; Means ± SE: Mean ± Standard Error  
Table 3. Laying performance and feed consumption of Dong Tao hens by farming model types  
Battery cage model  
Traditional model  
Criteria  
P
n1  
Means ± SE  
n2  
Means ± SE  
Total number of eggs in 52 weeks of  
laying (eggs)  
36  
36  
36  
94.91 ± 4.40  
5
68.92 ± 8.61  
96.24 ± 2.01  
34.80 ± 0.76  
*
Feed consumption per hen per day (g)  
105.79 ± 0.60  
38.51 ± 0.22  
5
5
***  
***  
Feed consumption per hen in 52 weeks  
of laying (kg)  
Feed conversion ratio (FCR/10 eggs)  
(kg)  
36  
4.06 ± 0.02  
5
4.57 ± 0.09  
***  
Note: (n1): number of hens; (n2): number of blocks; *** P< 0.001; * P< 0.05; Means ± SE: Mean ± Standard Error  
Table 4. Fertilizing ability of Ho chickens by farming model types  
Battery cage model  
Traditional model  
Means ± SE  
Criteria  
n
Means ± SE  
27.15 ± 2.10  
24.04 ± 1.89  
n
Incubated eggs (eggs)  
46  
46  
61  
61  
12.42 ± 0.28  
8.93 ± 0.25  
Embryonated eggs (eggs)  
Embryonated eggs/incubated eggs ratio  
(%)  
46  
46  
88.27 ± 0.82  
75.09 ± 1.38  
61  
61  
75.52 ± 1.82  
61.78 ± 1.41  
Hatched eggs/incubated eggs ratio (%)  
Hatched eggs/embryonated eggs ratio  
(%)  
46  
46  
85.19 ± 1.47  
1.74 ± 3.19  
61  
61  
85.95 ± 1.20  
1.27 ± 0.58  
Chick malformation ratio (%)  
Note: (n): number of incubation batches; *** P< 0.001; ** P< 0.01; NS: P> 0.05; Means ± SE: Mean ± Standard Error  
499  
Impact of Farming Models on the Reproductive Performance and Egg Quality of Vietnamese Local Chicken Breeds  
Table 5. Fertilizing ability of Dong Tao chickens by farming model types  
Battery cage model  
Means ± SE  
Traditional model  
Means ± SE  
Criteria  
n
n
Incubated eggs (eggs)  
47  
47  
47  
36.36 ± 1.43  
32.10 ± 1.26  
35  
35  
14.08 ± 1.41  
9.85 ± 0.99  
Embryonated eggs (eggs)  
Embryonated eggs/incubated  
eggs ratio (%)  
88.70 ± 0.90  
75.73 ± 1.24  
35  
35  
70.55 ± 1.42  
58.87 ± 2.52  
Hatched eggs/incubated eggs  
ratio (%)  
47  
47  
Hatched eggs/embryonated eggs  
ratio (%)  
85.46 ± 1.21  
1.33 ± 0.60  
35  
35  
83.52 ± 3.32  
1.78 ± 0.89  
Chick malformation ratio (%)  
47  
Note: (n): number of incubation batches; *** P< 0.001; NS: P> 0.05; Means ± SE: Mean ± Standard Error  
Table 6. Weight and external egg quality measurements of Ho hens by farming model type  
Battery cage model  
(n = 1080)  
Traditional model  
(n = 586)  
Criteria  
P
Means ± SE  
51.43 ± 0.17  
52.47 ± 0.09  
41.63 ± 0.05  
1.26 ± 0.35  
Means ± SE  
50.37 ± 0.18  
52.95 ± 0.10  
41.65 ± 0.07  
1.27 ± 0.15  
Weight (g)  
Length (mm)  
Width (mm)  
Shape index  
**  
NS  
NS  
NS  
Note: (n): number of specimens; ** P <0.01; NS: P >0.05; Means ± SE: Mean ± Standard Error  
Table 7. Weight and external egg quality measurements of Dong Tao hens by farming model type  
Battery cage model  
(n = 1723)  
Traditional model  
(n = 1106)  
Criteria  
P-value  
Means ± SE  
51.69 ± 0.19  
53.81 ± 0.11  
40.79 ± 0.22  
1.32 ± 0.38  
Means ± SE  
50.55 ± 0.14  
52.81 ± 0.08  
41.39 ± 0.06  
1.28 ± 0.11  
Weight (g)  
Length (mm)  
Width (mm)  
Shape index  
**  
***  
***  
***  
Note: (n): number of specimens; ** P< 0.01; *** P< 0.001; Means ± SE: Mean ± Standard Error  
than the weight of eggs produced by hens raised  
in the conventional farming model (51.43g and  
Weight and external egg quality  
The indicators of weight and external egg  
quality measurements are presented in Table 6  
(for Ho breed) and Table 7 (for Dong Tao breed).  
For Ho chickens, the weight of eggs produced by  
hens raised in battery cages was slightly higher  
50.37g, respectively, P< 0.01). Other criteria  
about egg size (length, width, and shape index)  
showed no significant correlations with the  
farming model types (P> 0.05). For Dong Tao  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
500  
Nguyen Van Duy et al. (2020)  
chickens, the difference of egg weights produced  
by hens raised in the two models was statistically  
meaningful (P< 0.01). The egg size criteria  
revealed a significant correlation with the farming  
model types (P< 0.001). Overall, the size of eggs  
laid by Dong Tao hens raised in a traditional flock  
were slightly higher than the size of eggs laid by  
Dong Tao hens raised in cages (Table 7).  
influential factor on changing physiological  
behaviors of laying hens (Özbey & Esen, 2007).  
According to our data, feed consumption for  
hens raised in battery cages was relatively higher  
than those raised in a traditional production type.  
The narrow space possibly stimulated the eating  
demand of the chickens. Nonetheless, the egg  
reproductive performance of chickens raised in  
battery cages was significantly higher than that  
of chickens raised on the ground, resulting in a  
more effective feed conversion ratio per 10  
eggs recorded.  
Discussion  
Reproductive traits and egg production  
Poultry reproductive performance is strongly  
regulated by genetic factors (Dottavio et al.,  
2001). In this study, the egg productivity of Ho  
and Dong Tao chickens raised in traditional and  
battery cage models were recorded as 65.52-  
88.47 eggs/hen/laying year and 68.92-94.91  
eggs/hens/laying year, respectively. Egg  
production depended on the farming model type.  
Compared to other studies, the laying  
performances of these two breeds were higher  
than that of fighting chickens (54.04  
eggs/hen/year) and the Mia breed (55-60  
eggs/hen/year) (MARD, 2016). However, the  
egg productivities of Ho and Dong Tao chickens  
were intensely lower than that of Ri chickens  
(123 eggs/hen/year) (FAO, 2008). The  
reproductive cycles of Ho and Dong Tao  
chickens usually last 2-3 weeks, with the  
frequency of one egg per 2-3 days. After the  
laying period, hens entered an incubation stage  
lasting about 3 weeks. Recently, small automatic  
incubators (500 eggs per plant) have been  
popularly used in farming households for egg  
incubation. This has contributed to an increase in  
egg production by decreasing the incubating  
period. In some cases, farmers use female turkeys  
for incubating. The purpose of these practices is  
to increase the hatching rates, and to also push  
the next reproductive cycle of the hens. However,  
the habit of hatching without eggs in Ho and  
Dong Tao hens is mostly unavoidable.  
The rates of embryonated eggs in the Ho and  
Dong Tao experimental populations in the  
traditional model were considerably lower than  
that of other local chicken breeds. In detail, this  
rate in Ho and Dong Tao chickens was 75.52%  
and 70.55%, respectively, compared to this  
indicator in multi-toe chickens (80.45%) (  
Nguyen Hoang Thinh et al., 2017) and in  
H’mong chickens (89.56%) (Duong Thi Anh  
Dao & Vu Thi Cuc, 2011). The massive bodies  
of Ho and Dong Tao chickens, which causes  
difficulties in mating, elucidates this low fertile.  
Besides, semen quality of Ho and Dong Tao  
cocks is not high (Do Thi Hue et al., 2017).  
Weight and external egg quality parameters  
This study showed that there was a  
significant difference in egg weight of both  
chicken breeds by farming model types. This  
result encounters a conflict with a previous  
report, which stated that eggs laid by chickens  
raised on the ground were heavier than those laid  
by chickens raised in battery cages (Özbey &  
Esen, 2007). However, a significant correlation  
between farming models and egg weight was also  
recorded in another research paper which showed  
that the eggs from cages were heavier than those  
from the litter (Tůmová et al., 2011).  
Egg weight is an indicator influenced by  
chicken body weight and genetic factors (Moula  
et al., 2009). In this study, the weight of eggs  
produced by Ho and Dong Tao chickens raised in  
two experimental farming model types were  
50.37-51.43g and 50.55-51.69g, respectively.  
Meanwhile, the egg weight of H’mong chickens  
and multi-toe chickens were 38.10g (Nguyen Thi  
Phuong et al., 2017) and 39.70g ( Nguyen Hoang  
Our results show that egg productivity of  
hens raised in battery cages was significantly  
higher than those raised in a traditional farming  
model type. This observation is compatible with  
the results of a previous study, in which the  
authors mentioned that stress might be an  
501  
Impact of Farming Models on the Reproductive Performance and Egg Quality of Vietnamese Local Chicken Breeds  
provides evidence of gene flow from wild to domestic  
populations. BioMed Central Genetics. 10: 1-8.  
Thinh et al., 2017) on average, respectively. It  
can be seen that the egg weight of Ho and Dong  
Tao chickens was considerably higher than those  
of other local breeds. In addition, the egg shape  
index of Ho and Dong Tao eggs were 1.26-1.27  
and 1.28-1.32, respectively. According to our  
Bui Huu Doan & Nguyen Van Luu (2006). A survey on  
distribution, conformation, growth and productivity of  
Ho chicken. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences.  
4: 95-99.  
Do Thi Hue, Nguyen Van Duy, Nguyen Thi Xuan, Do Duc  
results, the egg shape index of chickens raised in  
battery cages was higher than those raised in the  
traditional model. This conclusion was also  
reported in the literature (Özbey & Esen, 2007)  
with the shape indices of eggs being 77.65% for  
eggs from cages and 75.39% for eggs from the  
ground.  
Luc, Le Thi Tham, Dang Vu Binh & Vu Dinh Ton  
(2017). Semen quality and some factors affecting the  
semen quality of Dong Tao chicken. Vietnam Journal  
of Agricultural Sciences. 5: 598-604 (in Vietnamese).  
Dao Thi Hiep (2013). Production efficiency and  
consumption of some local chicken breeds: the case  
study of Ho and Dong Tao chickens: Hanoi University  
of Agricultural.  
Dottavio A. M., Canet Z. E., Alvarez M., Creixell B., Di  
Masso R. J. & Font M. T. (2001). Productive traits in  
Conclusions  
hybrid  
Animal. (2). Retrieved from  
hens  
with  
Fayoumi  
maternal  
The reproductive performance of Ho and  
Dong Tao chickens raised in battery cages  
showed considerable differences compared to  
chickens raised in a traditional farming model.  
The feed conversion ratio to produce 10 eggs for  
hens raised in the battery cages model was  
significantly lower than those raised in the  
conventional farming model. The weight of eggs  
produced by Ho and Dong Tao hens raised in  
battery cages were better compared to the  
traditional way.  
9
9646 on July 2, 2019.  
Duong Thi Anh Dao & Vu Thi Cuc (2011). Studing on  
some growing and reproductive characteristics of  
H'mong chickens reared under scavenging and  
semidustrial conditions in Thuan Chau - Son La.  
Journal of Animal Husbandry Sciences and Technics.  
12:14-20.  
GSO (2018). Statistical handbook of Hanoi; Statistical  
Publishing House.  
FAO (2008). Poultry systems in Vietnam Prepared by Duc  
N. V. & Long T. GCP/RAS/228/GER working paper  
Our recordings and analyses in this study  
result in an implication that egg hatchability of  
these two valuable local chicken breeds can be  
considerably improved when the ameliorate  
farming model type was applied. However, the  
concern of animal welfare should remain when  
considering farming model types in real scale.  
No.  
4.  
Rome.  
Retrieved  
from  
2019.  
MARD (2016). Atlas of livestock breeds in Vietnam,  
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (in  
Vietnamese).  
Moula N., Antoine-Moussiaux N., Farnir F & Leroy P.  
(2009). Comparison of egg composition and  
conservation ability in two Belgian local breeds and  
one commercial strain. International Journal of Poultry  
Science. 8: 768-774.  
Acknowledgements  
We would like to express our highest  
appreciation for the Académie de Recherche et  
d’Enseignement supérieur Commission de la  
Coopération au Développement (ARES – CCD)  
(Belgium) for its financial support to complete  
this research project.  
Ngo Thi Kim Cuc (2010). Vietnamese local chicken  
breeds: Genetic diversity and prioritizing breeds for  
conservation. PhD Thesis. Georg-August Universität.  
Nguyen Hoang Thinh, Pham Kim Dang, Vu Thi Thuy  
Hang, Hoang Anh Tuan & Bui Huu Doan (2017).  
Phenotypical  
Characteristics  
and  
Productive  
Performance of Multi-Toes Chicken Raised in The  
National Park of Xuan Son, Tan Son District, Phu Tho  
Province. Journal of Sciences and Development. 14: 9-  
20 (in Vietnamese).  
References  
Berthouly C., Leroy G., Van T. N., Thanh H. H., Bed'hom  
B., Nguyen B. T., Vu C. C., Monicat F., Tixier-  
boichard M., Verrier E., Maillar J. C. & Rognon X.  
(2009). Genetic analysis of local Vietnamese chickens  
Nguyen Thi Phuong, Hoang Ngoc Mai, Nguyen Van Duy  
& Vu Dinh Ton (2017). Reproductivity and egg quality  
of H'mong chicken. Animal production in Southeast  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
502  
Nguyen Van Duy et al. (2020)  
Asia: Current status and Future. July 21-22, 2017.  
Vietnam National University of Agricultural, Hanoi,  
Vietnam: 27-32 (in Vietnamese).  
characteristics of rock partridges. Poultry Science. 86:  
782-785.  
Pham M. H., Berthouly-Salazar C, Tran X. H, Chang W. H,  
Crooijmans R. P, Lin D. Y, Hoang V. T, Lee Y. P,  
Tixier-Boichard M & Chen C. F. (2013). Genetic  
diversity of Vietnamese domestic chicken populations  
as decision-making support for conservation  
strategies. Animal Genetics. 44: 509-521.  
Nguyen Van Duy, Do Duc Luc, Nguyen Thi Xuan, Nassim  
Moula, Vu Dinh Ton & Frédéric Farnir (2017). Dong  
Tao chicken: characteristics of an indigenous breed  
with big legs in Vietnam. The 4th FARAH-Day, 13  
October 2017. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,  
University of Liège - Belgium: 58.  
Lan Phuong T. N, Dong Xuan K. D. T & Szalay I. (2015).  
Traditions and local use of native Vietnamese chicken  
breeds in sustainable rural farming. World's Poultry  
Science Journal. 71: 385-396.  
Nguyen Van Duy, Nassim Moula, Pham Kim Dang, Dao  
Thi Hiep, Bui Huu Doan, Vu Dinh Ton & Frédéric  
Farnir (2015). Ho Chicken in Bac Ninh Province  
(Vietnam): From an Indigenous Chicken to Local  
Poultry Breed. International Journal of Poultry  
Science. 14(9): 521-528.  
Tůmová E., Englmaierova M., Ledvinka Z.  
&
Charvatova V. (2011). Interaction between housing  
system and genotype in relation to internal and  
external egg quality parameters. Czech Journal of  
Animal Science. 56: 490-498.  
Özbey O & Esen F. (2007). The effects of different  
breeding systems on egg productivity and egg quality  
.
503  
pdf 9 trang yennguyen 21640 Free
Bạn đang xem tài liệu "Impact of farming models on the reproductive performance and egg quality of Vietnamese local chicken breeds: Ho and Dong Tao", để tải tài liệu gốc về máy hãy click vào nút Download ở trên

File đính kèm:

  • pdfimpact_of_farming_models_on_the_reproductive_performance_and.pdf