Assessment of land resources potentials for orientation of agriculture land use in Ham Thuan Bac district, Binh Thuan province

ISSN 2588-1299  
VJAS 2020; 3(4): 817-830  
Vietnam Journal  
of Agricultural  
Sciences  
Assessment of Land Resources Potentials  
for Orientation of Agriculture Land Use in  
Ham Thuan Bac district, Binh Thuan  
province  
Nguyen Huu Thanh1, Hoang Le Huong2, Ngo Thanh Son1,  
Luyen Huu Cu1, Nguyen Duc Hung1, Nguyen Tho Hoang1 &  
Nguyen Van Thao1  
1Faulty of Land Management, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Gia Lam, Hanoi  
131000, Vietnam  
2Consulting Center of Technological Sciences for Natural Resources and Environment,  
Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Gia Lam, Hanoi 131000, Vietnam  
Abstract  
Land resources potential assessment is a valuable method for  
orienting land use planning in the world as well as in Vietnam. This  
study aimed to (1) assess land suitability and (2) orient the effective  
use of agricultural land in the study area. Results indicated that Ham  
Thuan Bac had 107 land mapping units (LMUs) with 11 main land-  
use types (LUTs) such as rice, cassava, vegetables, dragon fruit, and  
other trees. Agricultural land with high (S1) and moderate suitability  
(S2) for most LUTs was small; however, marginal (S3) and not  
suitability (N) lands were quite large. Results of land suitability  
evaluation on current land use showed that land area of annual crops  
was mainly found at the S3 suitability level, specifically for the rice  
area, 67.75% was marginally suitable and 23.29% of the area was  
unsuitable; In terms of perennial trees, except for dragon fruits which  
were mainly cultivated at the S2 suitability level (78.28%), the others  
such as cashew and other fruit trees were S3 and N levels. Based on  
land suitability classification, for mainstay LUTs, we proposed to  
keep 8550.0ha with S1, S2, and a part of S3 area to be irrigated for  
cultivating rice; 9071.7ha of dragon fruit land including 694.67ha of  
S1 and 8377.03ha of S2 land; only cultivate annual crops, fruit trees  
and grazing grass on the land with suitable levels from S1 to S3 of  
the current status; and the remaining areas of S3 and N levels for rice  
and areas of S2, S3, or N levels for dragon fruit would be converted  
to lands for annual crops, fruit trees, or grass for livestock.  
Keywords  
Agricultural land use, land resources potentials, land suitability, Ham  
Thuan Bac district  
Received: March 11, 2020  
Accepted: December 18, 2020  
Introduction  
Correspondence to  
nguyenhuuthanh@vnua.edu.vn;  
Assessment of land resource potentials is a fundamental step in  
817  
Assessment of land resources potentials for orientation of agriculture land use in Ham Thuan Bac district, Binh Thuan  
the process of land use planning (LUP) when  
land resources are limited (Bandyopadhyay et  
al., 2009). The rapid population growth, as well  
as human activities, has created pressure on  
agricultural land. Intensified farming activities  
without proper land management practices lead  
to the degradation of land (Abdelrahman et al.,  
2016). Land evaluation approach allows for  
identifying fundamental limiting factors for  
agricultural production, provides information in  
terms of constraints and opportunities for the  
utilization of land, and then guides decisions  
based on the optimal prerequisite for land use  
planning and development (Motuma et al., 2016;  
Truong et al., 2014; Pham Quang Vinh & Pham  
Thi Thanh Huong, 2012). Thus, land evaluation  
is implemented before recognizing the need for  
some changes in land use such as agricultural  
development or forestry plantation schemes.  
Ham Thuan Bac, a mountainous district of  
Binh Thuan province, has an agricultural land  
area of approximately 124 thousand hectares.  
Land resources are playing an important role in  
the economic development of the district.  
However, a serious constraint in this district is  
the lack of irrigation water during the dry season.  
Drought is one of the major factors limiting crop  
production in the area. Therefore, to maximize  
the effectiveness of the land resources, it is  
necessary to assess land suitability for  
agricultural production in Ham Thuan Bac  
district (Ngo Thanh Son et al., 2018; Hoang Le  
Huong et al., 2018). In drought-affected  
conditions, irrigation restricted areas are not  
suitable for crops that require water such as rice.  
Hence, it is an important step for the orientation  
of agricultural land use planning in the future.  
The objectives of the study were: (1) to  
assess land suitability; and (2) to orient an  
effective use of agricultural land in Ham Thuan  
Bac district. The results of the study could help  
to estimate the potential conversion of  
agricultural land and to recommend an effective  
agricultural land use system.  
Land suitability assessment plays an  
important role in agricultural development and  
future planning (Belal et al., 2014). This has been  
implemented to help decision-makers and  
agriculture development planners determine the  
optimal use of the land. Assessing land suitability  
for various crops is necessary to choose the right  
crop and variety for the area based on matching  
the suitability of the area with the crop. Various  
methods of land evaluation have been developed  
throughout the years (FAO, 1976; Sys, 1985).  
The Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO,  
1976) recommended an approach for land  
suitability evaluation for crops in terms of  
suitability ratings ranging from highly suitable to  
not suitable based on climatic and terrain data  
and soil properties. Sys (1985) proposed a range  
of capability indexes to denote soil limitations  
Study Area  
Ham Thuan Bac district is located in Binh  
Thuan province, Southern Central Coast of  
Vietnam (Figure 1). The natural area is  
1347.21km2 (Figure 1) with a population of  
173,253 people (2017). In this area, the  
topography is quite diversified including semi-  
mountainous terrain, alluvial plain, and coastal  
sand. The climate, characterized by the tropical  
monsoon region, is divided into two seasons,  
namely the rainy season from May to October  
and the dry season from November to April. The  
average temperature is approximately 26oC to  
28oC and the annual total precipitation varies  
from 1070mm (delta areas) to 1995mm (high  
mountains). However, precipitation is highly  
variable and unevenly distributed. Due to  
reduced rainfall in the dry season (11% of the  
total annual rainfall), the dry season often causes  
serious water shortages for food production and  
people's daily needs. According to reports from  
the Department of Agriculture and Rural  
for crop production.  
A
land suitability  
assessment could be viewed from three different  
perspectives: (i) productivity; (ii) workability;  
and (iii) sustained use of the land (Baja et al.,  
2001). With advances in information and  
communication technology, land evaluation  
through map analysis techniques based on the  
theoretical framework from FAO has been  
completed using a geographical information  
system (GIS) to analyze land capability to sustain  
a defined land use.  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
818  
Nguyen Huu Thanh et al. (2020)  
Development at Ham Thuan Bac district (2017),  
agricultural activities in many areas still depend  
on rain.  
classes or land unit indices for nominated land  
use. The first is produced from an approach  
called a categorical system and the second from  
a continuous method of land suitability  
evaluation.  
Methodology  
There are at least two important groups of  
land attributes for land suitability analysis:  
inherent qualities of soils and external  
characteristics. In this study, soil attributes,  
topographic elements, and management were  
used to represent all groups.  
The assessment of land quality for a specific  
type of land use is based on land use  
requirements and constraints. Such requirements  
and constraints are then used as the basis for  
establishing what is termed ‘evaluation criteria’  
(Figure 2).  
Land-use factors are land use characteristics  
in the study area such as land-use type or land  
cover, thereby helping to define the land  
attributes requirements appropriately. This study  
focuses on agricultural land uses (annual and  
perennial crops), identified through data  
collection and field surveys.  
Regarding these ‘evaluation criteria’, a set of  
algorithms is then employed to match the  
existing quality of land and the requirements of  
that particular type of land use.  
The matching procedure (FAO, 1976 and  
after) then establishes a ranking of the potentials  
of land for a given purpose. The final result of the  
land evaluation is a map that portrays the  
divisions of the area of interest into suitability  
The analytical procedure developed  
consisted of the following steps (Figure 3):  
Figure 1. Study site - Ham Thuan Bac district, Binh Thuan Province  
819  
Assessment of land resources potentials for orientation of agriculture land use in Ham Thuan Bac district, Binh Thuan  
Figure 1. Components of land suitability assessment  
Source: Baja et al. (2001)  
Figure 2. Methodological framework  
that of topography was based on the DEM which  
had continuous values.  
Step 1. Determination of individual ratings  
of land characteristics  
Each of the land attributes within variables  
Inherent qualities of soils  
in each group (i.e., soils, topography, and  
Soil types in Ham Thuan Bac included 8  
management) was first independently examined  
groups with 17 soil types from G01 to G17  
and rated from the collected data. The rating of  
corresponding to the following specific soil types  
(National Institute of Agricultural Planning and  
Projection, 2003) (Table 1).  
soil attributes was done based on the available  
soil map which had ‘crisp’ boundaries, irrigation  
areas identified from water resources data, while  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
820  
Nguyen Huu Thanh et al. (2020)  
Table 1. Soil types in Ham Thuan Bac district  
Sym.  
G01  
G02  
G03  
G04  
G05  
G06  
G07  
G08  
G09  
G10  
G11  
G12  
G13  
G14  
G15  
G16  
G17  
FAO soil classification  
Luvic Arenosols  
Gleyic Arenosols  
Haplic Solonchaks  
Eutric Fluvisols  
Cambic Fluvisols  
Humic Fluvisols  
Acrisols  
Vietnam soil classification  
Sand dune soil  
Area (ha)  
12,237.36  
867.97  
ARl  
ARg  
SCh  
FLe  
FLb  
FLu  
AC  
Cc  
Cg  
Mn  
P
Glay Sandy  
high saline soils  
53.38  
Alluvial soils without deposited  
Alluvial soil with the variegated horizon  
Stream alluvial soil  
7,591.98  
5,810.88  
3,872.60  
23,893.09  
175.83  
Pf  
Py  
X
Gray soils  
ACg  
FRx  
NTr  
FRp  
FRx  
FRx  
NTh  
Fru  
Gleyic Acrisols  
Xanthic Ferralsols  
Rhodic Nitisols  
Plinthic Ferralsols  
Xanthic Ferralsols  
Xanthic Ferralsols  
Haplic Nitisols  
Xg  
Fa  
Fk  
FL  
Fp  
Fs  
Ft  
Glay gray soils  
Yellow-red soils on acid magma  
Red-brown soil on basalt  
30,950.05  
13,717.42  
555.43  
Yellow-red soil changes due to rice cultivation  
Yellow-brown soil on ancient alluvial and sandstone  
Yellow red soil on clay rock  
10,876.45  
8,626.00  
2,205.56  
2,226.21  
4,680.59  
1,724.23  
4,386.19  
Purple brown soil on basalt  
Humic Ferralsols  
Eutric Fluvisols  
Lithic Leptosols  
Water  
Ha  
D
Red yellow humus on acid magma  
Valley soil formed from accretion products  
Eroded soil is exposed to gravel  
Waterbody  
FLe  
LPq  
E
W
10,468.92ha; 4,032.87ha; and 11,667.48ha,  
respectively.  
Soil thickness varied from 0 to 30cm  
(14,812.18ha), 30÷50cm (55.09ha), 50÷70cm  
(17,249.08ha), 70÷100cm (49,668.55ha), and the  
rest was greater than 100cm (4164.80ha).  
The irrigation area was determined based on  
the irrigation map of Binh Thuan province in  
combination with the collected primary data.  
There were 88,676.01ha (65.95% of agricultural  
and forest land) which depended on rain (or  
irrigation regime from rainwater), about  
23,998.99ha (17.85%) that was actively  
irrigated, and the remaining 12,595.81ha  
(9.37%) that was a semi-active irrigation regime.  
Soil texture in Ham Thuan Bac district was  
mainly light texture (sand, loamy sand, and  
sandy loam) occupying 82,924.30ha (61.68%).  
Heavy soil texture (clay loam, silty clay, and  
clay) occupied 34,342.36ha (25.54%). The area  
of medium soil texture (sandy clay loam, loam,  
silty loam, silty, silty clay loam, and sandy clay)  
was approximately 6,383.36 ha (4.75%).  
Step 2. Group ratings of land  
characteristics  
External characteristics  
Land attributes within each group were then  
combined using a ‘combination’ function. The  
result was land capability or land mapping units  
indicating areas with qualities that differed  
sufficiently from other land units to affect their  
suitability for different land uses (FAO). Land  
Mapping Units (LMUs) of the Ham Thuan Bac  
district were built in the area of agricultural land  
and unused land by overlaying thematic maps  
including soil types, slope, thickness, soil  
texture, and irrigation regime (Figure 4). These  
The slope was divided into 6 levels with  
approximately 50% of the natural land of Ham  
Thuan Bac having a very gentle slope ranging  
from 0 to 3o and 3 to 8o accounting for  
54,043.51ha (40.20%) and 13,459.75ha  
(10.01%), respectively. The semi-mountainous  
area of the district has steep slope (>25o)  
accounting for 31,598.28ha (23.50%). Gentle  
slope (8÷15o), moderate slope (15÷20o), and  
moderately steep slope (20÷25o) occupied  
821  
Assessment of land resources potentials for orientation of agriculture land use in Ham Thuan Bac district, Binh Thuan  
were the factors that had the greatest influence on  
farming of the study area, and in particular, there  
were regional differences in the study area, thus  
it determined the difference in the suitability of  
land use.  
LMU = “Soil type” & “Slope” & “thickness”  
& “texture” & “irrigation”  
= Gi & SLj & Dk & Tl & Im  
Where, Gi - type “i” of soil, i = 01-17;  
SLj -level “j” of slope, j = 01-06;  
(a)  
(d)  
(b)  
(e)  
(c)  
(f)  
Figure 3. Thematic maps: (a) Soil types, (b) Thickness, (c) Soil texture, (d) Slope, (e) Irrigation regime, and (f) Land mapping units  
of the Ham Thuan Bac district  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
822  
Nguyen Huu Thanh et al. (2020)  
Dk - level “k” of thickness, k = 01-05 & E;  
Tl - level “l” of texture, l = 01-03 & E;  
physiological requirements of a specific crop(s)  
and the existing biophysical land conditions.  
Im - level “m” of irrigation, m = 01-03.  
The first stage in matching was to compare  
the requirements of each land-use type with the  
land qualities of each land unit. The simplest  
procedure was to check the measured values of  
each land quality or characteristic against the  
class limits, and then allocate each land unit to its  
land suitability class according to the most severe  
limitation.  
Step 3: Calculation of overall land  
suitability indices  
Land-use requirements are described by the  
land qualities needed for sustainable production;  
land quality is a complex rating of land that has a  
direct effect on its use (evaluation criteria).  
At this stage, based on the cell-by-cell  
operation in the GIS database, all groups of land  
variables and land requirements were utilized to  
produce the overall indices of land suitability for  
cropping. The present study used the four-level  
land suitability classification commonly used by  
FAO (1976, 1983, 1985, and 2007) including:  
For cases in which at least one limitation was  
enough to render the land unsuitable for use, the  
method of taking the most severe limitation was  
valid. For example, for maize cultivation, it was  
of no use having level land and sufficient rainfall  
if the soils were highly saline. For less severe  
values of limitations, alternative methods of  
combining ratings for individual qualities could  
be used.  
S1 - Highly suitable, Land having no  
significant limitations to the sustained  
application of a given use or only minor  
limitations that will not significantly reduce  
productivity or benefits and will not raise inputs  
above an acceptable level;  
Step 5: Final matching  
The interim suitability classifications  
produced in the preceding step might be re-  
evaluated taking into consideration a range of  
additional factors, e.g., potential land  
improvements, environmental impacts, and  
economic and social analysis. This is a key step  
to help managers/planners make the most  
appropriate decision.  
S2 - Moderately suitable, Land having  
limitations which in the aggregate are moderately  
severe for sustained application of a given use;  
the limitations will reduce productivity or  
benefits and increase required inputs to the extent  
that the overall advantage to be gained from the  
use, although still attractive, will be appreciably  
inferior to that expected on Class S1 land;  
Results and Discussion  
S3 - Marginally suitable, Land having  
limitations which in the aggregate are severe for  
sustained application of a given user and will so  
reduce productivity or benefits, or increase  
required inputs, that this expenditure will be only  
marginally justified; and  
Land mapping unit  
Land mapping units were identified as one of  
the key bases for diagnosing the problem with  
land suitability. There were 107 LMUs in Ham  
Thuan Bac District in which: 6 LMUs belonged  
to Arenosols* (AR) group or sandy soils** (C)  
group (10.15% of total agricultural and unused  
land); 2 LMUs belonged to Solonchaks (SC) -  
saline soils (M) (0.02%); 18 LMUs belonged to  
Fluvisols (FL) - alluvial soils (P) (12.37%); 17  
LMUs belonged to Acrisols (AC) - gray soils (X)  
(18.51%); 53 LMUs belonged to Ferralsols (FA)  
- yellow-red soils (F) (52.24%); 1 LMU belonged  
to Ferralsols (FA) - reddish-yellow humus soils  
in the mountains (H) (3.74%); 2 LMUs belonged  
to Fluvisols (FL) - lowland soils (D) (1.68%);  
N - Not suitable, Land which has qualities  
that appear to preclude sustained use of the kind  
under consideration.  
Step 4: Interim matching of land-use  
requirements with actual land qualities  
Interim matching of land-use requirements  
with actual land qualities: matching (i.e.,  
suitability assessment) for each land-mapping  
unit could be considered only for the  
823  
Assessment of land resources potentials for orientation of agriculture land use in Ham Thuan Bac district, Binh Thuan  
and 8 LMUs belonged to Leptosols (LP) - eroded  
soils (E) (1.29%) (Note: * FAO’s soil  
classification; ** Vietnam’s soil classification).  
Land suitability classification  
Based on the land characteristics and land  
use requirements of the LUTs of Ham Thuan Bac  
district, the land suitability classification was  
determined for 11 land-use types for 61,126.09ha  
of agricultural production land in Ham Thuan  
Bac district (Table 3).  
Land use requirement  
Based on the current land use map  
(Department of Natural Resources and  
Environment of Ham Thuan Bac district, 2017)  
and the results of the survey on crop distributions  
in the district, there were 11 LUTs identified for  
agricultural purpose in Ham Thuan Bac district  
(Table 4 and Figure 5).  
Table 3 demonstrates the maximum suitable  
total area (S1/S2/S3) for each type of land use  
that could be obtained under the current  
conditions of the study area. The results of land  
suitability classification for each LUT separately  
indicated that for LUTs including rice, cashew,  
rubber, coffee, and other fruit trees (1, 8, 9, 10,  
and 11), if grown on the entire existing area,  
more than 50% of the area would be unsuitable.  
The remaining LUTs would be unsuitable lands,  
if cultivated in the entire existing area, which  
would vary from 6,579.72ha to 15,377.54ha,  
(10.76% to 25.16%) of the agricultural land. The  
suitability assessment for LUTs in the Ham  
Thuan Bac district showed that there was a small  
area that was highly suitable (S1) for all crops. In  
terms of moderate suitability level, most of LUTs  
had a certain area of compliance with S2  
suitability level, the largest areas were  
cultivating dragon fruit (46.24%) and grass  
(54.87%). Under the marginal suitability level, if  
all LUTs were cultivated on the entire area, had  
a quite large part of the area only reaching this  
level, ranging from 19,265.92ha (32.52%) to  
44,740.94ha (73.19%). The main limiting factors  
for all LUTs were inadequate rainfall and  
irrigation.  
As can be seen in Table 4, the fruit tree area  
occupied the largest area (31,348.82ha), of which  
dragon fruit accounted for 61.73% of orchard  
land (or 32% of total agricultural land -  
19,352.71ha), whereas other fruit trees including  
custard-apple, avocado, jackfruit, banana,  
mangosteen, and mango occupied 11,996.11ha  
(38.27%). The annual crop was predominantly  
paddy rice (12,588.97ha); however, rice  
cultivation was dependent on rain and irrigation  
conditions. Thus, paddy rice could be  
transplanted from 2 to 3 seasons a year. Other  
annual crops such as peanuts, beans  
(5,696.45ha), cassava and sweet potato  
(3,070.56ha), and maize (2,372.07ha) were  
widely cultivated in Ham Thuan Bac. Rice was  
mainly cultivated in drought-prone areas,  
therefore, in the winter-spring season, rice and  
other crops were often strongly affected by  
drought due to water shortage. In contrast to  
other LUTs, grass for livestock was not allocated  
in the district’s land use planning. Local people  
often grew grass in the land of annual crops or  
gardens, so the land area of this LUT was  
negligible (3.7ha).  
Applying land suitability classification for  
the current land use of agriculture in Ham Thuan  
Bac (Table 4, Figure 5, and Figure 6) indicated  
that land area of LUTs for annual crops was  
mainly found at the S3 suitability level, the  
percentage of these LUTs ranged from 67.75 to  
100.00% of the current land area where, for the  
current cultivated rice area, 23.29% of the area  
was unsuitable, and 67.75% was marginally  
suitable; In terms of perennial trees, except for  
dragon fruits which were mainly cultivated  
on the land at the S2 suitability level (78.28%),  
the other perennial trees such as cashew, rubber,  
coffee, and other fruit trees were cultivated on  
In this paper, the suitability criteria (land  
characteristics) for land use types were divided  
into four levels from highly suitable to not  
suitable (Table 2).  
Limiting values are the values of a land  
quality or land characteristic that determine the  
class limits of land suitability for a certain use. In  
orientation and land-use planning, the first and  
most important decision is to determine whether  
or not the land is suitable or unsuitable for  
production.  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
824  
Nguyen Huu Thanh et al. (2020)  
Table 2. Land use requirements of LUTs in Ham Thuan Bac district  
LUTs  
6
No.  
Land properties  
Code  
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10  
11  
Soil types (FAO/Vietnam)  
ARl / Cc  
1
2
G01  
G02  
G03  
G04  
G05  
G06  
G07  
G08  
G09  
G10  
G11  
G12  
G13  
G14  
G15  
G16  
G17  
N
3
N
N
N
1
2
1
2
N
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
2
N
N
N
N
2
N
N
N
1
3
N
N
1
2
2
1
3
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
N
2
2
N
1
3
1
3
N
3
1
3
2
3
1
2
3
N
3
N
N
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
N
1
2
2
N
2
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
2
N
N
N
N
N
N
3
N
N
N
N
N
N
3
N
N
N
1
ARg / Cg  
SCh / Mn  
FLe / P  
3
N
1
4
5
FLb / Pf  
2
3
2
1
6
Flu / Py  
1
2
2
1
7
AC / Xa  
3
3
3
N
2
8
ACg / Xg  
FRx / Fa  
NTr / Fk  
2
N
2
N
3
3
N
3
N
3
9
N
N
3
2
3
10  
11  
12  
13  
14  
15  
16  
17  
1
1
1
1
1
1
FRp / Fl  
N
2
N
3
N
1
N
2
3
N
2
FRx / Fp  
FRx / Fs  
NTh / Ft  
N
N
N
N
3
3
1
2
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Fru / Ha  
3
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
3
N
N
N
FLe / D  
N
N
N
N
LPq / E  
N
Slope  
I
< 3⁰  
SL1  
SL2  
SL3  
SL4  
SL5  
SL6  
1
N
N
N
N
N
1
1
2
3
3
N
2
1
2
3
3
N
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
3
N
1
1
2
2
3
N
1
2
1
1
2
2
3
N
II  
3 - 8⁰  
III  
IV  
V
8 - 15⁰  
3
2
3
3
3
15 - 20⁰  
N
N
N
3
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
20 - 25⁰  
N
N
VI  
> 25⁰  
Soil thickness  
> 100cm  
100 - 70cm  
70 - 50cm  
50 - 30cm  
< 30cm  
1
2
3
4
5
D1  
D2  
D3  
D4  
D5  
E
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
3
3
3
N
N
N
3
3
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Eroded soil  
Soil texture  
Eroded soil  
Light texture  
Medium texture  
Heavy texture  
Irrigation  
Rainfed  
E
N
2
1
3
N
2
1
3
N
1
2
3
N
1
2
3
N
2
1
2
N
1
2
3
N
2
1
2
N
2
1
2
N
2
1
2
N
3
2
1
N
2
1
2
1
2
3
T1  
T2  
T3  
1
2
3
I1  
I2  
I3  
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
Semi-active  
Active  
Note: LUTs: 1 - Rice, 2 - Maize, 3 - Cassava & sweet potato, 4 - Sugar cane, 5 - Grass for livestock, 6 - Other cash crops, 7 -  
Dragon fruit, 8 - Cashew, 9 - Rubber, 10 - Coffee, 11 - Other fruit trees  
Land suitability levels: 1 - S1 (High suitability), 2 - S2 (Moderate suitability), 3 - S3 (Marginal suitability), and N (Not suitability).  
Source: MARD (2008) and consultations with experts.  
825  
Assessment of land resources potentials for orientation of agriculture land use in Ham Thuan Bac district, Binh Thuan  
the land with S3 and N levels in which the  
unsuitable land area was 65.13%, 44.47%,  
85.61%, and 75.42%, respectively (in the total  
area of these LUTs).  
much different from LUTs under the land use  
plan in 2017 (Table 5).  
Currently, the area of rice cultivated was  
from 8,515 to 9,232ha depending on the season,  
whereas the cultivated rice area under the land-  
use plan in the district was 12,588.97ha, land-use  
efficiency was about 73%. The same was  
observed in all LUTs in the district. The reason  
for its difference is that Not suitability (N) or  
Marginal suitability (S3) occupied a majority of  
The orientation of agricultural land use  
According to survey results and statistics  
(Department of Agriculture and Rural  
Development of Ham Thuan Bac district, 2017;  
2018), the actual cultivated areas of LUTs were  
Table 3. LUTs and land suitability potential of agricultural land in Ham Thuan Bac  
Suitability levels (ha)  
Total area  
(ha)  
No.  
LUTs  
Notation  
S1  
S2  
S3  
N
1
2
Rice  
LUC  
CHN  
1487.49  
1487.49  
1075.24  
14143.29  
26757.20  
34165.17  
31806.17  
11330.15  
61,126.09  
61,126.09  
Maize  
Cassava and sweet  
potato  
3
CHN  
-
9399.02  
39872.98  
11854.09  
61,126.09  
4
5
Sugar cane  
Grass for livestock  
Other cash crops  
Dragon fruit  
Cashew  
CHN  
CHN  
CHN  
CLN  
CLN  
CLN  
CLN  
CLN  
8.58  
2,419.33  
33540.54  
9385.49  
28266.76  
6299.06  
2557.13  
-
43320.63  
20752.83  
44740.94  
22200.08  
19265.92  
22849.49  
26146.86  
6621.59  
15377.54  
6679.91  
6579.72  
9079.72  
35561.12  
35719.47  
34979.23  
38600.02  
61,126.09  
61,126.09  
61,126.09  
61,126.09  
61,126.09  
61,126.09  
61,126.09  
61,126.09  
152.81  
6
419.93  
7
1579.53  
8
-
9
Rubber  
-
10  
11  
Coffee  
-
Other fruit trees  
1579.53  
14324.95  
Table 4. Land suitability classification for current agriculture land use in Ham Thuan Bac  
Current suitability level (ha)  
Current area  
(ha)  
No.  
LUT  
Notation  
S1  
S2  
S3  
N
1
2
Rice  
LUC  
CHN  
CHN  
CHN  
CHN  
CHN  
CLN  
CLN  
CLN  
CLN  
CLN  
12,588.97  
2,372.07  
3,070.56  
497.91  
700.19  
74.55  
427.49  
325.95  
102.41  
7.04  
8,529.07  
1,848.85  
2,455.73  
486.09  
2,932.22  
122.71  
512.42  
4.78  
Maize  
3
Cassava & sweet potato  
Sugar cane  
4
5
Grass for livestock  
Other cash crops  
Dragon fruit  
3.69  
3.69  
6
5,696.45  
19,352.71  
3,507.57  
1,887.19  
152.86  
31.00  
1,389.46  
4,166.07  
2,455.06  
1,222.95  
1,048.06  
22.00  
109.91  
1,052.88  
2,284.61  
839.14  
7
694.67  
15,150.11  
8
Cashew  
9
Rubber  
10  
11  
Coffee  
130.86  
Other fruit trees  
11,996.11  
61,126.09  
112.94  
2,835.29  
9,047.87  
Total agricultural land  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
826  
Nguyen Huu Thanh et al. (2020)  
(a)  
(b)  
Figure 4. The current status map of agricultural land use in 2017 (a) and Map of land suitability classification for current agricultural  
land-use (b) of Ham Thuan Bac district  
Figure 5. Land adaptation map (or land potential)  
827  
Assessment of land resources potentials for orientation of agriculture land use in Ham Thuan Bac district, Binh Thuan  
Table 5. The actual cultivated area in 2017 and 2018 in Ham Thuan Bac district  
Actual cultivated area (ha)  
No.  
LUT  
Area (ha)  
Winter-spring  
Summer-autumn  
Autumn  
16-17  
17-18  
8,545.0  
68.0  
2017  
9,171.0  
528.0  
2018  
2017  
2018  
1
2
Rice  
12,588.97  
2,372.07  
8,515.0  
75.5  
9,000.0  
619.0  
9,323.0  
1,327.0  
9,079.0  
1,526.0  
Maize  
Cassava and sweet  
potato  
3
3,070.56  
9.5  
10.0  
1,086.0  
1,148.0  
44.0  
10.0  
4
5
Sugar cane  
Grass for livestock  
Other cash crops  
Dragon fruit  
Cashew  
497.91  
3.69  
269.0  
3.7  
164.0  
3.7  
1,552.0  
3.7  
1,403.0  
3.7  
39.0  
3.7  
41.0  
3.7  
6
5,696.45  
19,352.71  
3,507.57  
1,887.19  
152.86  
1,031.0  
9,000.0  
1,365.0  
1,531.0  
1,550.0  
858.0  
797.5  
1247  
1,410.0  
1,134.0  
1,438.0  
7
9,071.7  
1,728.0  
1,531.0  
1,634.0  
1,300.0  
8
9
Rubber  
10  
11  
Coffee  
Other fruit trees  
11,996.11  
the land area (Table 4). The district was not able  
to effectively use the land resources potentials if  
the limiting factors such as irrigation and shifting  
crop structure to adapt to water shortage  
conditions were not improved. Besides, the  
general limitation of the region was drought in  
the dry season (November to April),  
corresponding to winter-spring and early  
summer-autumn seasons.  
cultivated area of dragon fruit was only 9,000ha,  
which was much lower than the approved land  
use plan (19,352.71ha) of the district. Therefore,  
for this LUT, we recommend cultivating dragon  
fruit under the S1 suitability level (694.67ha) and  
approximately 8,377.03ha under the S2  
suitability level. The proposal of dragon fruit  
(6,773.08 ha) under the district’s plan should be  
shifted to annual crops, other fruit trees (mango  
and grapefruit, etc.), and grass for livestock. In  
terms of the perennial crop, the majority were  
cultivated under Suitability level (S3) and Not  
suitability level (N); therefore, we propose  
keeping these crops growing under S3, and the  
remaining area (12,302.49ha) under N level  
should be converted to afforestation and soil  
improvement plants.  
Hence, to meet the requirements of  
sustainable land use to land use sustainable we  
proposed to: (i) Maintain the land areas which  
have High suitability (S1) and Moderate  
suitability (S2) levels; (ii) Renovate or convert to  
other suitable plants/afforestation for Marginal  
suitable (S3) land areas; and (iii) Convert to  
afforestation or use plants that could improve soil  
quality of the Not Suitable (N) land areas.  
Conclusions  
Thus, based on the actual land use in Ham  
Thuan Bac district, we proposed to keep stable  
rice cultivation in the area of 8550ha (including  
1,127.68ha of rice under S1 and S2 suitability  
levels and 7,422.32ha rice under S3 suitability  
level) due to light soil texture (S3) but with active  
irrigation regime. The remaining area should be  
converted to other annual crops including rice  
area with remaining S3 and N suitability levels  
(due to yellowish-red soil). More importantly,  
due to the consumption market, the actual  
The analytical procedures developed in the  
five specific steps for assessing land suitability  
were used to develop an effective use of  
agricultural land in Ham Thuan Bac district,  
which had an area of 61126.09ha agricultural  
land and unused land with 11 common land-use  
types, with rice (21% of total agricultural land)  
and dragon fruit (32%) as the two main crops.  
Two important groups of land attributes for land  
suitability analysis including inherent qualities of  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
828  
Nguyen Huu Thanh et al. (2020)  
soils (soil attributes) and external characteristics  
(topographic elements, and management) were  
used. Soil attributes included three factors: soil-  
type consisting of 17 soil types (in 8 soil groups),  
soil thickness consisting of 6 levels, and soil  
approximately 8,377.03ha under the S2  
suitability level; and the remaining areas, with S3  
and N suitability levels for rice; and S2, S3, or N  
levels for dragon fruit, will be converted to other  
annual crops, other fruit trees, or grass for  
livestock.  
texture consisting of  
characteristics consisting of 6 levels. The  
management characteristic is irrigation  
consisting of 3 regimes.  
4
levels. Slope  
Acknowledgments  
We would like to express our sincere thanks  
to the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural  
Development (MARD) in Vietnam for funding  
this research. We also want to thank the  
Department of Agriculture and Rural  
Development and the Department of Natural  
Resources and Environment in Ham Thuan Bac  
district for providing information on land use  
planning, crop calendar, and irrigation practices.  
As a result of land mapping, based on the  
land characteristics, 107 LMUs were obtained  
over the entire agricultural and unused land of the  
study area. The majority belonged to Ferralsols  
(FA) groups (53 LMUs - 52.24%), followed by  
Acrisols (AC) (17 LMUs - 18.51%), Fluvisols  
(FL) (18 LMUs - 12.37%), Arenosols (AR) (6  
LUMs - 10.15%), and the rest are other soil  
groups. The combination between characteristics  
of 107 LMUs and land use requirements were  
employed to evaluate current land use in the  
study area from suitable (S1, S2, and S3) to not  
suitable (N). The land area of LUTs of annual  
crops was mainly found at the S3 suitability  
level, where, for the current cultivated rice area,  
23.29% of the area was unsuitable (N), and  
67.75% was marginally suitable (S3).  
Meanwhile in terms of perennial trees, except for  
dragon fruits which were mainly cultivated at the  
S2 suitability level (78.28%), the other perennial  
LUTs (cashew, rubber, coffee, and other fruit  
trees) were cultivated with S3 and N levels, in  
which, the unsuitable land area was 65.13%,  
44.47%, 85.61%, and 75.42%, respectively (in  
the total area of these LUTs).  
References  
Abdelrahman M. A., Natarajan A. & Hegde R. (2016).  
Assessment of land suitability and capability by  
integrating remote sensing and GIS for agriculture in  
Chamarajanagar district, Karnataka, India. The  
Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space  
Science. 19(1): 125-141.  
Baja S., Chapman D. M. & Dragovich D. (2001). A  
conceptual model for assessing agricultural land  
suitability at a catchment level using a continuous  
approach in GIS. In Proceedings of the Geospatial  
Information and Agriculture Conference: 17-19.  
Bandyopadhyay S., Jaiswal R. K., Hegde V. S. &  
Jayaraman V. (2009). Assessment of land suitability  
potentials for agriculture using a remote sensing and  
GIS based approach. International Journal of Remote  
Sensing. 30(4): 879-895.  
Belal A. A., El-Ramady H. R., Mohamed E. S. & Saleh A.  
M. (2014). Drought risk assessment using remote  
sensing and GIS techniques, Arabian Journal of  
Geosciences. 7(1): 35-53.  
To meet the requirements of sustainable land  
use, the following orientations have been  
proposed: (i) maintain the land areas which have  
High suitability (S1) and Moderate suitability  
(S2) levels; (ii) renovate or convert to other  
suitable plants/afforestation for Marginal  
suitable (S3) land areas; and (iii) convert to  
afforestation or use plants can improve soil  
quality for Not suitable (N) land areas. Therefore,  
for mainstay LUTs, the suggestions are to keep  
8,550 hectares of land for rice with land  
suitability of S1, S2, and a part of the S3 levels  
which can be irrigated; To fit market demand, it  
is recommended to cultivate dragon fruit under  
the S1 suitability level (694.67ha) and  
FAO (1976). A framework for land evaluation. FAO Soil  
Bulletin No. 32, Rome.  
FAO (1983). Guidelines: land evaluation for rainfed  
agriculture. FAO Soils Bulletin No. 52, Rome.  
FAO (1985). Guidelines: land evaluation for irrigated  
agriculture. FAO Soils Bulletin No. 55, Rome.  
FAO (2007). A framework for land evaluation. FAO soil  
bulletin No. 6. Rome, Italy.  
Ham Thuan Bac People’s Committees (2017). Report on  
Land-use planning. 102 pages (in Vietnamese)  
Ham Thuan Bac People’s Committees (2018). Report on  
Land-use planning. 152 pages (in Vietnamese)  
829  
Assessment of land resources potentials for orientation of agriculture land use in Ham Thuan Bac district, Binh Thuan  
Nguyen Huu Thanh (2018). Assessment of Drought  
Characterization at Binh Thuan province in the period  
of 1984-2016. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural  
Science. 16(4): 339-350.  
Hoang Le Huong, Ngo Thanh Son & Nguyen Huu Thanh  
(2018). Assessment of Drought Indices using Different  
Methods in South Central Coast of Vietnam. In the  
proceedings of International Conference - GISIDEA  
2018, Can Tho, Vietnam.  
Sys C. (1985). Land Evaluation. Algemeen Bestuur van de  
Ontwikkelingss, Ghent, Belgium: International  
Training Centre for Post-Graduate Soil Scientists,  
State University of Ghent.  
MARD (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development),  
2008. Land Use Manual. Volume 2: Land Evaluation  
Classification. Science and Technology Publishing  
House, 200 pages.  
Pham Quang Vinh & Pham Thi Thanh Huong (2012).  
Assessment of agricultural drought in Binh Thuan  
province under climate change scenario. Vietnam  
Journal of Earth Sciences. 344: 513-523 (in  
Vietnamese).  
Motuma M., Suryabhagavan K. V. & Balakrishnan M.  
(2016). Land suitability analysis for wheat and  
sorghum crops in Wogdie District, South Wollo,  
Ethiopia, using geospatial tools. Applied Geomatics.  
8(1): 57-66.  
Truong Q., Ma Z., Ma C., He L. & Luong T. (2014).  
Applications of GIS for Evaluation Land Suitability  
for Development Planning of Peanut Production. In  
International Conference on Geo-Informatics in  
Resource Management and Sustainable Ecosystem.  
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg: 684-698.  
National Institute of Agricultural Planning and Projection,  
2003. Report on Soil Map of Binh Thuan province: 85  
pages (in Vietnamese).  
Ngo Thanh Son, Hoang Le Huong, Luyen Huu Cu &  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
830  
pdf 14 trang yennguyen 226680 Free
Bạn đang xem tài liệu "Assessment of land resources potentials for orientation of agriculture land use in Ham Thuan Bac district, Binh Thuan province", để tải tài liệu gốc về máy hãy click vào nút Download ở trên

File đính kèm:

  • pdfassessment_of_land_resources_potentials_for_orientation_of_a.pdf