Experimental studies to verify the effect of chip shrinkage coefficient on cutting forces and surface roughness in high speed milling of A6061 aluminum alloy

Journal of Science & Technology 119 (2017) 001-005  
Experimental Studies to Verify the Effect of Chip Shrinkage Coefficient on  
Cutting Forces and Surface Roughness in High Speed Milling of A6061  
Aluminum Alloy  
Pham Thi Hoa1,2, Mac Thi Bich1,2, Banh Tien Long1, Nguyen Duc Toan1*  
1 Hanoi University of Science and Technology, No. 1, Dai Co Viet, Hai Ba Trung, Hanoi, Viet Nam  
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hungyen University of Technology and Education, Hungyen, Vietnam  
Received: June 14, 2016; accepted: June 9, 2017  
Abstract  
This paper studied the relationship between the cutting force, surface roughness and chip shrinkage  
coefficient through the affect of cutting parameters, i.e., cutting speed, feed rate and uncut chip thickness.  
Experimental results of the chip shrinkage coefficient, cutting force and surface roughness at various cutting  
parameter values for high-speed milling of A6061 aluminum alloy were presented in this study. The results  
show that the cutting force and surface roughness can be derived based on the relationships with chip  
shrinkage coefficient.  
Keywords: High-speed milling, A6061 aluminum alloy, Chip shrinkage coefficient, Surface roughness,  
Cutting force.  
1. Introduction1  
High-speed milling (HSM) has become an  
innovative technique, which keeps improving  
progressively. It is particular important to model of  
the HSM process in order to aid for prediction of the  
cutting process variables. Consequently, modeling of  
HSM process is essential for the design and  
optimization of the cutting conditions.  
ensure workpiece surface roughness at a desired  
quality, properly cutting parameters should be  
established. Several researchers studied the  
relationships of surface roughness and cutting  
parameters such as nose radius, clearance angle,  
cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut, rake angle [7].  
Nowadays, research on surface roughness influenced  
by cutting parameters is continuing for enhancing  
product quality at low cost.  
Cutting force in a milling process is one of the  
most important issues for the selection of machining  
parameters, such as feed rate and spindle speed [1].  
Many researchers using both experiment and  
simulation approaches for prediction of cutting  
forces of HSM processes [2-4]. Compare to  
experiment approach, simulation of a milling process  
using Finite Element Method (FEM) show a  
beneficial of providing more detail information of  
cutting process variables, such as cutting forces, tool  
stresses and temperatures [5]. Nowadays,  
development of cutting force model for HSM is  
increasing interests toward higher precise cutting  
force estimation and applicable for different cutting  
conditions.  
Another concern in modeling the HSM process  
is estimation of chip geometric parameters, such as  
chip thickness, chip length, etc. Since accuracy of the  
model for chip parameter estimation directly affects  
the accuracy of the cutting force predictions, accurate  
chip modeling is always desired in the estimation of  
cutting forces, especially in micro milling [8]. Chip  
shrinkage coefficient defined as the ratio of the uncut  
chip length by the actual chip length, can be a  
prominent parameter for modeling of a cutting  
process. However, studies on the chip shrinkage  
coefficient have been limited in literature.  
This study investigate the effect of cutting  
parameters, i.e., cutting speed, feed rate and uncut  
chip thickness on the chip shrinkage coefficient,  
cutting force, surface roughness. The relationship  
between this factor are found the chip shrinkage  
coefficient and cutting force, surface roughness and  
cutting parameters are found through experimental  
measurement for high-speed milling of A6061  
aluminum alloy.  
One of the major challenges of milling at high  
speeds is that high-speed milling leads to the high  
temperature and stress growing at the interfaces of  
chip-tool or workpiece-tool resulting in unexpected  
roughness of workpiece surface finish [6]. In order to  
* Corresponding author: Tel: (+84) 988 693 047  
Email: toan.nguyenduc@hust.edu.vn  
1
Journal of Science & Technology 119 (2017) 001-005  
2. Experimental setup  
device.  
2.1 Workpiece material  
The workpiece used in this study is aluminum  
alloy A6061, which has the hardness of 97HB. The  
chemical composition of workpiece material is  
represented in Table 1. Several workpieces used for  
experiment are shown Figure 1. The workpiece  
dimensions are 70x30x70 (mm).  
Table 1. Chemical composition of the workpiece material  
(%).  
Si  
0,4-0,8  
Cr  
Fe  
0,3  
Zn  
Cu  
0,05-0,3  
Ti  
Mn  
0,10  
Mg  
0,8-1,2  
Fig. 2. Surface roughness tester  
Al  
remaining  
The Sartorius Volume Comparator (S224-1S)  
scale is used to determine the weigh of the chip after  
cutting. The scale parameters are as follows: capactiy  
of 220 gr, readability of 0.1 mg.  
0,05-0,30  
0,25  
0,15  
The chip shrinkage coefficient (K) can be  
calculated by following formula [11]:  
1000.Q  
K   
(1)  
.L.S.t  
where Q is weight of the chip (gr), is material  
density (g/cm3), l is chip length (mm), S and t are  
feed rate (mm/rev) and uncut chip thickness (mm),  
respectively.  
3. Design of experiment  
Fig .1. The workpieces used in experiments  
2.2 Milling experiment  
The effects of cutting speed, feed rate, uncut  
chip thickness, on chip shrinkage coefficient, force  
cutting, surface roughness are examined using a  
three-factor/three-level full factorial design [10]. The  
range of each factor is set at three different levels as  
shown in Table 2. Figure 3 shows the experimental  
set-up of the milling process.  
All the experiments are performed on a HS  
Super MC500  
high-speed milling machine  
maximum feed rate of 30 m/min, maximum spindle  
speed of 30.000 rpm, travel distances of the  
operating platform in the X, Y and Z directions of  
500 mm, 400 mm and 300 mm, respectively. Dry  
milling condition with carbide insert cutting tool  
(APMTT1604PDTR TC300) and diameter of 40 mm  
is used for milling.  
2.3 Measurement equipment  
The cutting forces are measured by force  
measurement device Kisler, which is equipped with a  
force sensor (Kisler 9257B). The maximum load  
capacities of the device in X, Y and Z directions are  
1500N, 1500N and 5000N, respectively. The  
sensitivity of sensor in X, Y and Z directions are 7.39  
pC/N 7.39 pC/N and 3.72 pC/N, respectively. The  
measured data is collected by an acquisition system  
using DASYlab 10.0 software.  
The surface roughness of the machined  
workpiece is measured by a surface roughness tester  
(Mitutoyo SJ400). The roughness values are in µm.  
Figure 2 shows the surface roughness measuring  
Fig. 3. Experimental set-up  
2
Journal of Science & Technology 119 (2017) 001-005  
b3 b4  
F bV b f t  
(3)  
(4)  
2
Table 2. Cutting parameters for the experiment  
1
Level  
3
c3 c4  
Ra c1V c f t  
No. Parameter  
Unit  
m/min  
mm/min  
mm  
Level 1 Level 2  
2
V
where ai, bi, ci (i = 1...4) are the constants to be  
determined. Using curve fitting tool in Minitab17,  
those constants can be determined as shown in Table  
4.  
1
2
3
(cutting  
speed)  
f
1000  
800  
0,5  
1130  
1350  
1,0  
1256  
1800  
1,5  
(feed rate)  
t
Table 4. Fitted constants obtained by surface fitting  
(uncut chip  
thickness)  
method  
Table 3. Experimental results  
i
1
2
3
4
-0,1402635  
0,889866 0,0090714 0,0339467  
a
Ra  
(m)  
V
f
F
(N)  
0,092838  
1264,012  
-0,36893  
0,047466  
b
c
No  
t (mm)  
K
(m/ min)(m/min)  
0,10138765  
5820,781 -1,378843 0,04978739  
1
2
1,294 135,71  
1,304 126,98  
1,322 120,88  
1,370 111,73  
1,144 146,36  
1,102 128,42  
1,137 139,71  
1,133 117,38  
1,236 125,46  
1,236 124,82  
1,236 126,72  
0,64  
0,39  
0,60  
0,31  
0,53  
0,48  
0,55  
0,35  
0,44  
0,44  
0,44  
1000  
1256  
1000  
1256  
1000  
1256  
1000  
1256  
800  
800  
0,5  
0,5  
Figures 4-6 show K, F, and Ra as a function of  
the cutting parameters, i.e., V, f and t, respectively,  
obtained using equations (2), (3) and (4) with the  
constants in Table 4. Figure 4 shows that increasing  
cutting speed leads to the increase of K. On the other  
hand, K is decreased with increasing depth of cut.  
This figure also shows that t has a great influence on  
K, while the effect of f on K is minor. Besides,  
cutting speed increases leading to the decrease in  
contact area between the chip and the front of the  
tool. Consequently, chip shrinkage coefficient is  
increased [11]. In order to obtain the optimal cutting  
parameter values for minimizing K, MAPLE  
software is utilized based on NLPSolve command.  
Optimal values for V, f and t are 1000 m/min, 800  
mm/min, and 1.5 mm, respectively.  
0,5  
0,5  
3
1800  
1800  
800  
4
5
1,5  
1,5  
1,5  
1,5  
1
6
800  
7
1800  
1800  
8
9
1130  
1130  
1350  
1350  
10  
11  
1
1130  
1350  
1
4. Results and discussions  
4.1 Influences of V, f and t on the K, F and Ra  
Table 3 shows the experiment results of K, F, Ra as a  
function of V, f and t. Using curve-fitting tool, the  
relationship between K, F, Ra dependence on V, f and  
t is established. That relationship is described by the  
following equation (2), (3),(4).  
From Figure 5, increasing V, f or t all reduces F.  
This is because at high-speed cutting, the generated  
heat can soften the materials thus decreasing cutting  
forces [11]. Using NLPSolve command, the optimal  
parameters of V, f and t for the objective function of  
minimizing F are also found equal to 1256 m/min,  
1800 mm/min, and 0.5 mm, respectively.  
a3 a4  
K a1V a f t  
(2)  
2
Fig. 4. The relationship between K and cutting parameters V, t and f. a) Fixed V, b) Fixed f, c) Fixed t  
3
Journal of Science & Technology 119 (2017) 001-005  
Fig. 5. The relationship between F and cutting parameters V, t and f. a) Fixed V, b) Fixed f, c) Fixed  
Fig. 6. The relationship between Ra and cutting parameters V, t and f. a) Fixed V, b) Fixed f, c) Fixed t  
Fig. 7. The relationship between F and K  
Fig. 8. The relationship between Ra and K  
Figure 6 indicates that Ra increases with  
increasing f and t but reduces with increasing V. This  
is because under high-speed cutting, the built up edge  
phenomenon would disappears leading the reduction  
of surface roughness [11]. Similar to K and F, the  
optimized values of V, f and t for minimizing Ra are  
1256 m/min, 1800 mm/min and 0.5 mm, respectively.  
f and t on the relationship between F and K as well as  
Ra and K, the five-level full factorial design was  
assigned for cutting speed (V) of 1000, 1064, 1128,  
1192, 1256 m/min; feed rate (f) of 800, 1050, 1300,  
1550, 1800 mm/min and uncut chip thickness (t) of  
0.5, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50 mm, respectively.  
It is seen that minimum values of F and Ra are  
117N and 0.403m, respectively, which are all  
obtained at K = 1.312. When K is equal to 1.154,  
maximum values of F and Ra are obtained equal to  
146N and 0.64m, respectively.  
4.2 The relationship between F and K, Ra and K  
This section analyzes the relationship between F  
and K as well as, Ra and K based on Eqs. (2-4). By  
eliminating V, f and t from Eqs. (2-4), the relationship  
between F and K, Ra and K are found. As shown in  
Figures 7-8, In order to verify the effect of various V,  
The figures 7 and 8 also summarize the affected  
trend of cutting parameters i.e., cutting speed, feed  
4
Journal of Science & Technology 119 (2017) 001-005  
prediction of cutting forces in end milling with  
rate and uncut chip thickness on the cutting force (F)  
and surface roughness (Ra) related with chip  
shrinkage coefficient (K) as discussing in detail on  
section 4.1. From those figures, the optimal cutting  
parameters can be obtained by minimizing cutting  
force (F), surface roughness (Ra) and chip shrinkage  
coefficient (K). In order to minimize the F and Ra, the  
maximum of cutting speed (V) and minimum of feed  
rate (f) also uncut chip thickness (t) should be set.  
However, the decreasing of uncut chip thickness (t)  
will increase the chip shrinkage coefficient (K)  
therefore (t) will be chosen based on the productivity  
of manufacturing process.  
application to cor-nering cuts, International Journal of  
Machine Tool Design and Research 22 (1982) 722.  
[3] H.J. Fu, R.E. DeVor, S.G. Kapoor, A mechanistic  
model for prediction of the force system in face  
milling oper-ation, ASME Journal of Engineering for  
Industry 106 (1984) 8188.  
[4] W.P. Wang, Solid modelling for optimizing metal  
removal of three-dimensional end milling, Journal of  
Manufac-turing Systems 7 (1984) 5766.  
[5] T. O. Zel, T. Altan, Modeling of high speed  
machining processes for predicted tool forces stresses  
and temperatures using FEM simulations, in:  
Proceedings of the CIRP International Workshop on  
Modeling of Machining Oper-ations, Atlanta, GA,  
(1998) 225234.  
5. Conclusions  
This paper presents an experimental study on  
relationship between cutting force, surface roughness  
and chip shrinkage coefficient when high speed  
milling of A6061 aluminum alloy. Some conclusions  
are given as follows:  
[6] Tugrul Ozel, Taylan Altan, Process simulation using  
finite element method - prediction of cutting forces,  
tool stresses and temperatures in high-speed flat end  
milling, International Journal of Machine Tools &  
Manufacture 40 (2000) 713738.  
1. The relationship between the cutting force, surface  
roughness and chip shrinkage coefficient through  
cutting parameters e.g., cutting speed, feed rate, uncut  
chip thickness are explicitly described by  
mathematical functions.  
[7] Mehmet Alper, İlhan ASİLTÜRK, Effects of Cutting  
Tool Parameters on Surface Roughness, International  
Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science, 4(8)  
(2015) 15-22.  
[8] Ali Mamedo, Ismail Lazoglu, An evaluation of micro  
milling chip thickness models for the process  
mechanics, the International Journal of Advanced  
Manufacturing Technology, (2015) 1-7  
2. The optimal cutting parameters for chip shrinkage  
coefficient, cutting force and surface roughness can  
be found by maximizing the cutting speed (V) and  
minimizing the feed rate (f), which are useful for  
practical milling of A6061 aluminum alloy.  
[9] Swan MS. Incorporation of a general strain-to-failure  
fracture criterion into a stress-based elasticity model  
through a time-to-failure softening mechanism. M.Sc.  
Thesis in Mechanical Engineering University of Utah,  
USA.(2012)  
Acknowledgements: This research is funded by  
Vietnam National Foundation for Science and  
Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant  
number “107.02-2016.01”.  
[10] K. Venkata, M. Krishnam, G. R. Janardhana,  
Optimization of Cutting Conditions for Surface  
Roughness in CNC End Milling, 12( 3) (2011) 383–  
391.  
References  
[1] Wu Baohai, Yan Xue, Luo Ming, Gao Ge, Cutting  
force prediction for circular end milling process,  
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 26 (4) (2013) 1057–  
1063.  
[11] Banh Tien Long, Tran The Luc and Tran Sy Tuy.  
Metal Cutting Principles, 2nd Ed, Science and  
Technics Publishing House, (2013) (In Vietnamese)  
[2] W.A. Kline, R.E. DeVor, J.R. Lindberg, The  
5
pdf 5 trang yennguyen 16/04/2022 1380
Bạn đang xem tài liệu "Experimental studies to verify the effect of chip shrinkage coefficient on cutting forces and surface roughness in high speed milling of A6061 aluminum alloy", để tải tài liệu gốc về máy hãy click vào nút Download ở trên

File đính kèm:

  • pdfexperimental_studies_to_verify_the_effect_of_chip_shrinkage.pdf