Assessment of clinical, paraclinical, and surgical characteristics of patients received aortic valve replacement at 108 military central hospital
Journal OF MILITARY PHARMACO - MEDICINE N05 - 2021
ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL, PARACLINICAL, AND SURGICAL
CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS RECEIVED AORTIC VALVE
REPLACEMENT AT 108 MILITARY CENTRAL HOSPITAL
Ngo Tuan Anh ¹, Nguyen Truong Giang ²
SUMMARY
Objectives: To review some clinical, paraclinical, and surgical characteristics of patients
who received aortic mechanical valve replacement at 108 Military Central Hospital. Subjects
and methods: 69 patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) received aortic mechanical valve
replacement. Clinical and paraclinical symptoms of AS based on the criteria of the Viet Nam
National Heart Association and ACC/AHA guidelines. Results: Anamnesis of rheumatic fever
was 61.0%, NYHA II and III were 100%. Sinus rhythm was 94,2% and Sokolow - Lyon > 35 mm
was 100%. Echocardiography: severe aortic valve took up 97.1%, mean pressure gradient > 40
mmHg accounted for 95.7%, left ventricular hypertrophied but left ventricular systolic function
still preserved. Valve size 21 and 23 were the most used with 81.2%. The mean aortic cross-
clamp time and operative time were 73.5 38 minutes and 113 94.9 minutes. Conclusion:
Patients presented with symptoms of aortic stenosis, severe aortic valve stenosis on ultrasound,
and left ventricular hypertrophy. In surgery, mechanical valves were the most common,
accounted for 73.9%, in which valve size 21 took up 58%.
*Keywords: Aortic valve replacement; Aortic valve stenosis (AS).
INTRODUCTION
Evaluation of the aortic valve has
always been considered the most difficult
of the heart valves, but thanks to the
advance in diagnostic tools and the aging
population, aortic stenosis has become
more common [7]. However, to date there
is no way to predict the rate of disease
progression in specific patients. Therefore,
it is necessary to periodically monitor and
carefully propagate the signs of disease
progression [1]. The disease usually
progresses silently, when symptoms appear,
the prognosis is severe, with a 2-year
mortality rate up to 50%. According to
Braunwald, the mean survival time of
patients with AS onset is < 5 years [6].
The normal aortic valve area is around
3 - 4 cm2. Aortic stenosis is a progressive
disease that leads to a gradual reduction
in the orifice area, and it results in
increased left ventricular load while
simultaneously affecting systemic perfusion.
Historically, the majority of patients with
severe AS receiving aortic valve replacement
exhibited a high transvalvular gradient,
with variable left ventricular hypertrophy
and normal or reduced left ventricular
ejection fraction (LVEF) [6].
¹108 Central Military Hospital
²Vietnam Military Medical University
Corresponding author: Ngo Tuan Anh (tuananhterexa@gmail.com)
Date received: 20/4/2021
Date accepted: 9/5/2021
208
Journal OF MILITARY PHARMACO - MEDICINE N05 - 2021
This is further complicated by comorbidity
+ Surgery: Mechanical aortic valves,
the size of mechanical aortic valves,
the time of aortic cross - clamp and
cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
associated with progressive aging, in
particular coronary artery disease,
hypertension, diabetes and the progressive
decreases of the compliance of the
vascular bed. Aortic valve replacement
surgery is an effective treatment for a
patient with severe AS.
- Evaluation criteria based on the
standards of the Vietnam National Heart
Association and ACC/AHA guidelines
(USA) [2, 8].
Our hospital has performed many
heart surgeries, and this research aims:
To review some clinical, paraclinical and
surgical characteristics of patients with AS
who received aortic valve replacement at
108 Military Central Hospital.
3. Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed with SPSS
programe 20.0. Values are presented as
mean values, SD, percentage rate and
p values < 0.05 were considered as
significant.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
1. Subjects
RESULTS
1. Clinical characteristics and medical
history
69 patients were diagnosed with AS
and received aortic valve replacement at
108 Military Central Hospital during the
period from May 2010 to May 2020.
Table 1: Some clinical and historical
characteristics (n = 69).
Clinical characteristics,
Rate (%)
medical history
2. Methods
* Research method: Prospective research,
Rheumatic heart disease
Degenerative aortic valve disease
Euro score ≥ 5%
61.0
29.0
17.3
34.8
14.5
42.0
58.0
5.8
descriptive cross-sectional study.
- Conduct research: Study about the
history of the disease, clinical and
paraclinical characteristics under a uniform
procedure definition:
Hypertension
+ History of the disease: Rheumatic
heart disease, congenital aortic valve disease
[2, 8].
Coronary Artery Disease
II
NYHA class
III
+ ECG: Pulse, Sokolow - Lyon [8].
+ Transthoracic echocardiographic
assessment includes measures of AS
severity, LV function and LV wall thickness,
and cavity dimensions and ejection
fraction should be based on existing
recommendations [8].
Arrhythmia
Rheumatic heart disease accounted for
high rates (61%), NYHA II and III for 100%,
arrhythmia for 5.8% and Euro score ≥ 5%
for 17.3%.
209
Journal OF MILITARY PHARMACO - MEDICINE N05 - 2021
2. Some paraclinical characteristics of aortic valve stenosis
Table 2: Some major paraclinical characteristics (n = 69).
Paraclinical features
Rate (%)
Sinus rhythm
Electrocardiogram
94.2
100.0
97.1
Sokolow - Lyon > 35 mm
Very severe and severe aortic stenosis
Echocardiography
Moderate aortic stenosis
2.9
Mean pressure gradient > 40 mmHg
95.7
ECG was mainly sinus rhythm and left ventricular hypertrophy. The results of
echocardiography showed that severe aortic valve stenosis took up 97.1%, mean pressure
gradient > 40 mmHg accounted for 95.7%.
Table 3: Left ventricular size and function (n = 69).
Echocardiogram results
Male (n = 48)
61.9 10.7
41 - 78
Female (n = 21)
58.7 15.7
30 - 87
General results
60.9 12.4
30 - 87
SD
EF (%)
Min - Max
SD
49.6 8.2
30 - 71
49.4 10.2
32 - 68
49.5 8.8
30 - 71
LVEDd (mm)
LVEDs (mm)
Min - Max
SD
33.4 7.3
20 - 51
32.9 8.2
19 - 49
33.3 7.6
19 - 51
Min - Max
Left ventricular hypertrophy with mean LVEDd and LVEDs are 49.5 8.8 mm and
33.3 7.6 mm, respectively. Left ventricular systolic function is preserved.
3. Some characteristics in the operation
Figure 1: The types of mechanical aortic valve used (n = 69).
The most commonly used mechanical aortic valve were St-JUDE and Sorin, the
proportions being 34.8% and 29%, respectively. In addition, some other types of biological
valve also widely used were Biocor valves with the rate of 11.6%.
210
Journal OF MILITARY PHARMACO - MEDICINE N05 - 2021
Ozaki
Figure 2: The size of aortic valve replacement (n = 69).
The most used valves were of sizes 21 and 23, accounting for 81.2%, of which
valve size 21 accounted for more than 50% of aortic valve replacement cases.
Table 4: Aortic cross-clamp and CPB (n = 69).
Time
Male (n = 48)
75.5 39.4
Female (n = 21)
68.6 34.7
General results
73.5 38.0
Aortic cross - clamp time (minutes)
CPB time (minutes)
107.8 78.8
124.8 124.8
113 94.9
The operative time was about 120 minutes. Mean aortic cross-clamp time was
73.5 38.0 minutes, and mean CPB time was 113 94.9 minutes.
DISCUSSION
'degenerative' mechanism because of the
increase in access to health care in
developed countries and the increasing
age of the population in the us and
europe. however, this result is different
from author Nguyen Hai Au [3] in a study
on 50 patients, the causes of severe
aortic stenosis include: 42% was the
degenerative valve, 29% was the rheumatic
heart, and 29% was congenital aortic
valve disease. this result is also different
from the epidemiological trend of as with
a high rate due to degenerative valve, this
may be due to different patient groups.
1. Clinical characteristics and medical
history
The data in table 1 shows that the
cause of stenosis is mainly due to
rheumatism with the rate of 61%,
degeneration with the rate of 29%, and
10% is due to congenital. this result is
consistent with
some studies
in
developing countries with high rates of
group a hemolytic streptococcus [2]. the
incidence of calcific aortic stenosis is
increasing as the general age of the
population increases. for many years,
rheumatic heart disease was the main
cause of aortic valve disease. over the
last half-century, however, there has been
a change from a rheumatic etiology to a
Some common chronic diseases were
also associated with AS, such as
hypertension (34.8%) and coronary artery
disease (14.5%). Several epidemiological
211
Journal OF MILITARY PHARMACO - MEDICINE N05 - 2021
studies have reported a strong association serious injury. According to medical
between hypertension and the occurrence
of degenerative AS [9]. Furthermore,
a history of common hypertension (30 - 80%)
is associated with exacerbation of
pathological problems in patients with
degenerative AS [3].
documents, when AS appears symptoms,
the mortality rate increases by 9.4%/year
[6].
These are important implications for
surgical indications for the purpose of
prolonging life and improving the patient's
quality of life [7]. The CPB time of our
study is similar to many other studies in
the country [4, 5].
Euro score scale ≥ 5% took up 17.3%
and ≤ 3% was the main one accounting
for 72.5%, showing the severe condition
of the study subject with the high rate of
early mortality post-surgery [7].
In addition to the surgical criterion of
aortic valve replacement surgery, the
degree of AS, mean difference in left
ventricular systolic function (EF), left end-
diastolic diameter (LVEDd), and left end-
systolic left ventricular diameter (LVEDs)
are also interested in research [7, 8].
The NYHA class II and III were 100%,
in which the NYHA III was mainly. This
result is similar to other studies on clinical
manifestations of heart failure but the rate
of severe heart failure is higher than that
of other domestic and foreign studies. For
example, Nguyen Hai Au’s study recorded
the number of 32% [3]. Without NYHA I,
IV in this study, NYHA I has no surgical
indication, and patients with NYHA IV
would be very difficult postoperative care
with many complications.
The EF%, LVEDd and LVEDs showed
left ventricular dilation but left ventricular
systolic function was preserved. This
result is equivalent to other domestic
studies such as Duong Duc Hung’s (64.5
13.3; 49.84 9.57 and 31.93 8.68),
Hachiro K. and et al’s (61.1 10.3; 49.3
2. Some paraclinical characteristics
of AS.
6.9 and 33.1
7.2) [5, 10]. There is a
study showing that severely reduced left
ventricular function is one of the factors
predicting the risk of death in patients with
aortic stenosis.
The rate of sinus rhythm before
surgery accounted for 94.2%. The picture
suggesting left ventricular (LV) thickening
and LV anemia with Sokolow - Lyon > 35
mm is 100%. Similar to the research of
Nguyen Hai Au, the rate of sinus rhythm
was 82.35% and the increased LV burden
was 91.04% [5].
3. Some characteristics in the surgery
The valve type and size of the artificial
aortic valve chosen to suit the patient are
very important to avoid prosthesis-patient
mismatch (PPM) and complications after
surgery. The term valve PPM describes a
state in which the effective orifice area
(EOA) of a normally functioning heart
The results of echocardiography are
mainly severe aortic valve stenosis
with the rate of 97.1%, mean gradient
> 40mmHg is 95.7%, this shows that
damage to the aortic valve system is
212
Journal OF MILITARY PHARMACO - MEDICINE N05 - 2021
CONCLUSION
valve prosthesis is too small in relation
to the patient's body size; this situation
results in high transvalvular pressure
gradients [8]. Mechanical valves used for
aortic valve replacement (AVR) continue
to be associated with bleeding risks
because of anticoagulation therapy, while
bioprosthetic valves are at risk of structural
valve deterioration requiring reoperation.
This risk/benefit ratio of mechanical and
bioprosthetic valves has led American
and European guidelines on valvular heart
disease to be consistent in recommending
the use of mechanical prostheses in patients
younger than 60 years of age [7, 8].
Symptoms of aortic stenosis were
evident with moderate and severe heart
failure in 100% of cases, severe aortic
stenosis accounted for 97.1%, and
mean PG (> 40 mmHg) was 95.7%. Left
ventricular hypertrophy with an increase
of LVEDd, LVEDs and Sokolow - Lyon
> 35 mm was 100%. The mechanical
aortic valve used in surgery was mainly
the valve size 21, in which St.Jude and
Sorin valves were 63.8%, CPB time was
113 94.9 minutes.
REFERENCES
1. Phạm Nguyễn Vinh. Bệnh học Tim mạch,
tập 2. Nhà xuất bản Y học 2013.
The results in figure 1 show that St.
Jude and Sorin valves are the most used
valves, mainly with valve sizes 21 and 23,
with a high ratio of 81.2%. Many studies
have found that these are two types of
valves with large EOA, with valve size 21
2. Phạm Nguyễn Vinh và CS. Khuyến cáo
2008 về chẩn đoán và điều trị các bệnh van tim.
Khuyến cáo của Hội Tim mạch học Việt Nam
2008.
3. Nguyễn Hải Âu. Đánh giá kết quả điều
trị phẫu thuật trên bệnh nhân hẹp van động
mạch chủ tại Khoa Phẫu thuật tim, Bệnh viện
Chợ Rẫy. Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh 2019.
about 1.5
0.1 and with valve size 23
about 1.98 0.23 [8]. The results of using
the valves are also different from other
studies, this may be due to the surgeon's
habit of using the artificial valve or the
specifics of the hospital.
4. Tạ Hoàng Tuấn, Đặng Hanh Sơn, Đoàn
Quốc Hưng. Đặc điểm lâm sàng và siêu âm
trước mổ bệnh nhân thay van động mạch chủ
cơ học Sorin Bicarbon tại Bệnh viện Tim Hà
Nội. Tạp chí Phẫu thuật Tim mạch và Lồng
ngực Việt Nam 2016; 13:23-29.
Many authors are interested in Aortic
cross-clamp times and CPB time because
the longer those times, the more
postoperative the complications are the
CPB time of the study (113 94.9 minutes)
was similar to the results of Nguyen Hai
5. Dương Đức Hùng, Phan Thanh Nam.
Kết quả bước đầu phẫu thuật thay van động
mạch chủ b ằng van không gọng. Bệnh viện
Bạch Mai. Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Đơn vị
phẫu thuật 2015.
Au’s study (120.6
longer than the result of the author Duong
Duc Hung’s study (95 21.25 minutes)
48.6 minutes) and
6. Man DL, et al. Braunwald’s heart disease:
A
textbook of cardiovascular medicine,
10th edition, Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
[3, 5]. It may be due to the complexity of
the aortic valve lesions in different studies.
Philadelphia 2015.
213
Journal OF MILITARY PHARMACO - MEDICINE N05 - 2021
7. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al. Heart Association Task Force on Clinical
Recommendations on the echocardiographic Practice Guidelines 2017; 70(2):252-289.
assessment of aortic valve stenosis: A focused
9. Makkar, Raj R, et al. Association
update from the European association of
between
transcatheter
aortic
valve
cardiovascular imaging and the American
society of echocardiography. European Heart
replacement for bicuspid vs tricuspid aortic
stenosis and mortality or stroke. Jama 2019;
321(22):2193-2202.
Journal
-
Cardiovascular Imaging 2017;
18:254-275.
10. Hachiro K, Kinoshita T, Asai T, et al.
Left ventricular mass regression in patients
without patient-prosthesis mismatch after
aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
General Thoracic And Cardiovascular Surgery
2020; 68(3):227-232.
8. Nishimura, Rick A, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC
focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC
guideline for the management of patients with
valvular heart disease:
A report of the
American College of Cardiology/American
214
Bạn đang xem tài liệu "Assessment of clinical, paraclinical, and surgical characteristics of patients received aortic valve replacement at 108 military central hospital", để tải tài liệu gốc về máy hãy click vào nút Download ở trên
File đính kèm:
assessment_of_clinical_paraclinical_and_surgical_characteris.pdf

