Analysis of relapse childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia at Hue central hospital in Vietnam

Hue Central Hospital  
ANALYSIS OF RELAPSE CHILDHOOD ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC  
LEUKEMIA AT HUE CENTRAL HOSPITAL IN VIETNAM  
Nguyen Thi Kim Hoa1, Tran Kiem Hao1, Chau Van Ha1, Kazuyo Watanabe1  
ABSTRACT  
Background: Treatment outcome of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children has shown an  
improvement. However, relapse of disease is still a big protslen in developing countries. This study aimed  
to analyze the percentage and survival rate of relapsed in patients with childhood acute lymphoblastic  
leukemia treated at Hue Central Hospital, Vietnam, during the period of January 2012 - April 2018.  
Methods: It was a retrospective and prospective descriptive study. Data were analyzed according to  
age, gender, relapse type, relapse time.  
Results: There were 156 new patients with ALL admitted hospital, in which, there were 26 relapsed  
cases, accounted for 16.67%. Of 26 relapsed cases, the ratio of male to female was 2.71:1. High risk  
group was 1.6 times higher than standard group (61.5% vs 38.5%). 85.5% of patients achieved remission  
after induction phase. The mean time from diagnosis to relapse was 29.3 ± 18.2 months, in which the  
rate of early, intermediate and late relapse were 38.5%, 26.9% and 34.6% respectively. Based on relapse  
abandonment. Based on relapse type, bone marrow relapse accounted 38.5%, followed by isolated CNS,  
bone marrow combined CNS relapse (23.1% and 23.1% for respectively), while the rest had a relapse in  
testes, combination of testis and bone marrow, and testis combined CNS. The median time from relapse to  
death were 7.5 ± 8.3 months. Until April 2018, 73.1% of relapsed cases passed away and 26.9% of cases  
were are alive.  
Conclusions:  
marrow and CNS were the main sites of relapse.  
Key words: Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, relapse.  
I. INTRODUCTION  
of ALL occours between 2 to 5 year of age. With  
advances in chemotherapy, hematopoietic stem  
cell transplantation and supportive care, long-term  
survival in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia  
is now 85-90%. Despite increasing, concerns  
regarding treatment related mortality and second  
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most  
common malignant disease in children. It accounts  
for one-fourth of all childhood cancers and 72% of  
all cases of childhood leukemia. The incidence is  
about 2 to 5 per 100.000 children. The peak incidence  
1. Hue Central Hospital  
2. ACCL, Japan  
- Received: 24/7/2018; Revised: 16/8/2018  
- Accepted: 27/8/2018  
- Corresponding author: Nguyen Thi Kim Hoa  
- Email: kimhoa.fmi@gmail.com.  
Journal of Clinical Medicine - No. 51/2018  
19  
T
malignancies, the main reason for treatment failure between the ages 1 months and 16 years old,  
is still relapse. The prognostic factors most important registered at Hue Pediatric Center- Hue Central  
for determining survival post-relapse include: site Hospital, between 1st January 2012 to 30th April  
of relapse (bone marrow vs. isolated extramedullary 2018. Medical records of the patients who were  
vs. combined), timing of relapse (early vs. late), diagnosed relapse during this period were further  
phenotype of the original and recurrent disease, analyzed for the purpose of this study.  
prognostic features characterizing the primary  
diagnosis and depth of response [2], [3], [4]..  
2.2. Methods  
A describe retrospective and prospective study:  
Hue Central Hospital plays an important role to We collected the data of 156 new patients diagnosed  
treat childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the acute lymphoblastic leukemia at Hue Pediatric  
centralzoneofVietnamwhichcoversgeographically Center, then we analysed and followed up 26 cases  
wide areas. Since 2008, ALL patients have treated with relapse ALL.  
by  
CCG 1882 & 1881 protocol. In order  
Diagnosis of ALL at presentation was made on  
to improve the treatment outcome, we carry out bone marrow morphology showed more than 25%  
this research to analyze the incidence and survival leukemic blasts.  
rate of relapse in patients with childhood acute  
lymphoblastic leukemia treated at Hue Central CCG 1882 & 1881 protocol.  
Hospital, Vietnam, during the period of January  
2012 - April 2018.  
diagnosis (early: <18 months; intermediate: 18-36  
II. PATIENTS AND METHODS  
2.1. Patients  
Data were analyzed according to age, gender,  
relapse type, relapse time.  
We reviewed the medical records of pediatric  
Statistical analysis: Data were analyzed using  
patients treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia Medcalc program.  
III. RESULTS  
3.1. The percentage of relapse rate  
Table 1: The incidence of relapse rate  
Characteristic  
Relapsed patients  
Non-relapsed patients  
Total  
n
%
26  
16.67  
83.33  
100  
130  
156  
Of 156 patients, relapsed cases accounted for 16.67%.  
3.2. Characteristics of relapsed patients  
Table 2: The characteristics of relapsed patients  
Characteristics  
Gender  
Male  
n
%
19  
7
73.1  
26.9  
Female  
20  
Journal of Clinical Medicine - No. 51/2018  
Hue Central Hospital  
Standard  
High  
10  
16  
38.5  
61.5  
Yes  
No  
23  
3
88.5  
11.5  
100  
Total  
26  
standard group (61.5% vs 38.5%). 88.5% of patients achieved remission after induction phase.  
Table 3: Time of relapse  
n
10  
7
%
Early relapse  
Intermediate relapse  
Late relapse  
38.5  
26.9  
34.6  
9
29.3 ± 18.2  
Maintenance phase  
Finishing treatment  
14  
6
53.8  
23.1  
15.4  
7.7  
4
Consolidation  
Total  
2
26  
100  
Of 26 relapsed cases: 14 (53.8%) occurred in maintenance phase, 4 (15.4%) occurred in delay  
Table 4: Site of relapse  
n
10  
6
%
38.5  
23.1  
23.1  
7.6  
CNS  
6
Testis  
2
1
3.85  
3.85  
100  
Testis + CNS  
Total  
1
26  
by CNS and BM + CNS (23.1% and 23.1% respectively).  
Journal of Clinical Medicine - No. 51/2018  
21  
T
3.5. Time from relapse to death  
Table 5: Time from relapse to death  
Status of patient until April 2018  
n
%
Alive  
7
19  
26.9  
73.1  
100  
dead  
Total  
26  
Median time, month range  
7.5 ± 8.3  
Comment: Until April, 2018, there was only 7 (26.9%) alive patients, 19 (73.1%) patients passed away.  
The median time from relapse to death was 7.5 ± 8.3 months  
3.6. Relation between relapse events and survival after relapse  
Survival after relapse  
100  
80  
Relapse events  
60  
< 18 months  
18-36 months  
36 months  
40  
20  
0
0
5
10  
15  
20  
25  
30  
35  
Time (months)  
Figure 1: The relation between relapse events and the survival after relapse  
Intermediate relapse had better survival time than early relapse  
IV. DISCUSSION  
4.2. Characteristics of relapse patients  
Table 2 showed the ratio of male to female  
was 2.7:1. Some researches also showed that the  
incidence of ALL was higher among boys than girls,  
and male has a distinctly poor prognosis factor, girls  
has a better prognosis than boys [9], [10].  
4.1. The incidence of relapse rate:  
Table 1 showed the relapse rate for ALL was  
16.67%. Similarly, Locatelli and Oskarsson showed  
relapse occurred in 15-20% patients [4], [8].  
According to Mulatsih and Nguyen, the rate were  
higher: 24.5% and 20.5 % respectively [5], [6].  
High risk group was 1.6 times higher than  
22  
Journal of Clinical Medicine - No. 51/2018  
Hue Central Hospital  
standard group (61.5% vs 38.5%) in our study.  
[9]. According to Nguyen, 5 - year survival rates for  
NCI SR: 50.4 ± 2.4% vs NCI HR: 22.6 ± 2.1% [6].  
researches. It can be the seasson of our protocol.  
some tests, such as MRD to evaluate the response.  
3 patients (11.5%) didn’t achieve remission. This  
induction therapy has prognositc value [8].  
±
The median time from diagnosis to relapse  
±
± 2.1%) or concurrent BM (39.4% ± 5.0%) relapses  
[6].  
34.6% respectively. Based on relapse timing, 53.8%  
relapsed during maintenance phase, 23.1% relaspe  
resonable. Time to relapse remains the strongest  
predictor of survival. According to Nguyen,  
estimates of 5 year survival rates for isolated  
patient relapsed during maintenance phase [5].  
± 1.9, 18.4 ± 3.1  
respectively). The last percentage (15.3%) belonged  
According to Mulatsih, the highest site for relapse  
and 43.5 ± 5.2% respectively. The relative risk of  
result (19.05% and 13.55% respectively) [5]. Philip  
35% respectively [11].  
Most relapse cases occurred at maintenance  
these facts, modifying the protocol to use escalated  
testicular relapse (2-3%) [9]. The reason for relapse  
testes had long been considered a sanctuary site in  
the blood-testes barrier can be overcome. And our  
protocol couldn’t be strong enough to eradicate  
ALL cell in testis [7].  
therapies such as stem cell transplantation need to  
be applied. With the support from Asian Children  
Journal of Clinical Medicine - No. 51/2018  
23  
T
transplantation, we hope in the near future, we can do stem cell transplantation to save relapse children.  
REFERENCES  
pp. 2142-2150.  
1. Gaynon P.S, Roger P.Q, Chappell R. J, et al  
(1998), “Survival after relapse in childhood  
acute lymphoblastic leukemia”, Cancer, vol. 82,  
No.7, pp. 1387-1395.  
7.  
-
trates in children with acute lymphoblastic leu-  
kemia: a prospective study. Med Pediatr Oncol  
12:386-93, 1984.  
2. Goto Hiroaki (2015), “Childhood relapse acute  
lymphoblastic leukemia: Biology and recent  
treatment progress”, Pediatrics International,  
vol 56, pp. 1059-1066.  
8. Oskarsson Trausti, Soherhall Stephan, Arvidson  
Johan, et al (2016), “Relapse childhood acute  
lymphoblastic leukemia in the Nordic countries:  
prognostic factors, treatment and outcome”,  
Haematologica, Vol. 101, No. 1, pp. 68-76.  
3. Henderson MJ, Choi S, BeesleyAH, et al (2008),  
“Mechanism of relapse in pediatric acute lym-  
phoblastic leukemia”, Cell Cylce, vol 15, No. 7,  
pp. 1315-20.  
9. Philip A. Pizzo, David G. Poplack (2016), Prin-  
ciples and practices of pediatrics oncology,  
7th  
(Philadephia), pp. 463-497.  
edition by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
4. Locatelli Franco, Schrappe Martin, Bernado M.E,  
et al (2012), “How I treat relapsed childhood acute 10.Slats Am, Egler RM et al (2005), “Cause of  
lymphoblastic leukemia”, Blood, vol. 12, No.14,  
pp. 2807-2815.  
death, other than progressive leukemia in child-  
hood acute lymphoblastic (ALL), and myeloid  
leukemia (AML): the Dutch Childhood Oncol-  
ogy Group experience”, Leukemia, Vol. 19,  
pp. 573-544.  
5. Mulatsih Sri Purwamto, “Relapse in Pediatric  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Review  
gyakarta  
Pediatric”,  
Cancer  
Registry,  
Yogyakarta, Indonesia.  
11.Van Den Berg H, Groot-Kruseman H.A, Damen  
6. Nguyen K, Devidas M, Cheng S.C, et al (2008),  
relapse in children with acute lymphoblastic  
leukemia: a report based on the Duth Childhood  
Oncology Group”, Pediatric Blood Cancer, vol.  
57, pp. 210-216.  
acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children’s  
Oncology Group study”, Leukemia, vol 22,  
24  
Journal of Clinical Medicine - No. 51/2018  
pdf 6 trang yennguyen 14/04/2022 5280
Bạn đang xem tài liệu "Analysis of relapse childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia at Hue central hospital in Vietnam", để tải tài liệu gốc về máy hãy click vào nút Download ở trên

File đính kèm:

  • pdfanalysis_of_relapse_childhood_acute_lymphoblastic_leukemia_a.pdf