Environmentally friendly unburnt bricks using raw rice husk and bottom ash as fine aggregates: Physical and mechanical properties

Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering, NUCE 2021. 15 (1): 110–120  
ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY UNBURNT BRICKS  
USING RAW RICE HUSK AND BOTTOM ASH AS FINE  
AGGREGATES: PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL  
PROPERTIES  
Ngo Si Huya, Nguyen Ngoc Tanb,∗, Mai Thi Ngoc Hanga, Le Ngoc Quangc  
aDepartment of Engineering and Technology, Hong Duc University,  
565 Quang Trung street, Dong Ve ward, Thanh Hoa city, Vietnam  
bFaculty of Building and Industrial Construction, National University of Civil Engineering,  
55 Giai Phong road, Hai Ba Trung district, Hanoi, Vietnam  
cUrban Management Office of Thanh Hoa City, Nguyen Hoang Avenue,  
Dong Hai ward, Thanh Hoa city, Vietnam  
Article history:  
Received 30/11/2020, Revised 07/01/2020, Accepted 08/01/2020  
Abstract  
In order to reduce the serious impacts of industrial and agricultural wastes on the environment, raw rice husk  
and bottom ash were used as fine aggregates, while fly ash was utilized as a binder material in the produc-  
tion of unburnt building bricks. Two group mixtures were designed with water-to-binder (W/B) ratios of 0.30  
and 0.35. The rice husk was used to replace 0%, 3%, 6%, and 9% of bottom ash content by mass. An experi-  
mental program was carried out on the brick samples at different ages from 3-day to 28-day to determine the  
main physical and mechanical properties of brick, such as unit weight, compressive strength, water absorption,  
ultrasonic pulse velocity and thermal conductivity. The microstructure of brick material was captured using  
scanning electron microscope technique. The experimental results allow to identify the effects of rice husk,  
bottom ash content as well as W/B ratio on the properties of bricks. Brick samples produced in this study had a  
proper compressive strength meeting the practice requirement and were classified as Grade M3.5 and 5.0 based  
on TCVN 6477:2016. At the use of 9% rice husk, the unit weight and thermal conductivity of bricks were really  
low (1.06÷1.08 T/m3 and 0.201÷0.216 W/m.K), they are conformed to be used in temporary construction and  
insulation structures.  
Keywords: rice husk; bottom ash; fly ash; unburnt brick; ultrasonic pulse velocity; thermal conductivity.  
https://doi.org/10.31814/stce.nuce2021-15(1)-10 © 2021 National University of Civil Engineering  
1. Introduction  
From past to present, brick is one of the common construction building materials not only do-  
mestically but also worldwide. As estimated in previous studies, 42 billion and 1.391 trillion units of  
bricks were annually consumed in Vietnam [1] and in the world [2], respectively. However, most of  
them were fired-clay bricks, referred to as traditional bricks. In order to produce a huge quantity of  
fired-clay bricks as mentioned above, a lot of fuel and natural resources were demanded. The produc-  
tion process of traditional bricks also released a large amount of toxic gases into the air, especially  
∗Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (Tan, N. N.)  
110  
Huy, N. S., et al. / Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering  
carbon dioxide, causing environmental pollution. Therefore, the Prime Minister of Vietnam has is-  
sued the Directive on enhancing the use of unburnt construction materials and limiting the production  
of fired-clay bricks since 2012. Especially, the reuse of solid wastes from industry to produce unfired  
building bricks has been encouraging.  
In Vietnam, the common unfired building bricks are produced from cement, sand or crushed  
stone as fine aggregates, and water. Their unit weight and compressive strength are typical around  
2.0÷2.2 T/m3 and 3.5÷7.5 MPa, respectively [3]. It is noticed that the production of cement also  
causes the depletion of natural resources and put the negative impacts on the environment. Recently,  
the over extraction of river sand is another issue related to aquatic life, water sources, erosion and land  
loss. While the crushing of quarried stones also has some problems associated with the noise pollution  
and damages the natural environment. On the other hand, many types of industrial wastes such as fly  
ash, bottom ash, copper mining tailings, gold mill tailings, red mud are emitted to the environment  
due to the growth of population and a higher demand of human. These industrial wastes have seriously  
impacts on the environment and human life. Turning such wastes into green construction materials is  
an effective solution not only for the environment but also for the economic benefit.  
Among many types of solid industrial wastes, the thermal power plant ashes such as fly ash and  
bottom ash were widely used in the production of unburnt bricks. While fly ash was used as a binder  
material [4–10], bottom ash was utilized as fine aggregate [3, 11–14]. Although the test results were  
different among these studies, but most of them showed the high possible using both fly ash and  
bottom ash in the manufacturing of unfired bricks. Besides fly ash and bottom ash, other industrial  
wastes such as copper mining tailings [15], gold mill tailings [16], and red mud [9] have been also  
recycled in the production of unburnt bricks. The recycling of industrial and agricultural wastes in  
the production of unburnt bricks is a trend in the 4.0 revolution of the construction industry that is  
attracted to many researchers.  
Rice husk is an agricultural waste, which is a major by-product of the rice milling process. As  
estimated in 2010, an approximation of 149 million tons of rice husk was generated in over the world  
[17]. In recent decades, Vietnam is known as one of the largest rice exporter in the world. Conse-  
quently, a huge amount of rice husk is emitted. A part of it is used as fuel by famers, another part  
is used in agricultural land reclamation. However, most of them are dumped into the rivers, causing  
some serious problems related to environmental pollution [1]. Therefore, turning such waste into the  
construction materials has received many attentions from researchers. While some studies investi-  
gated the use of rice husk as a component in fired – clay bricks [18–21], others used rice husk ash in  
the production of unburnt bricks [1, 22]. It is noticed that ground rice husk ash can be used as binder  
materials [1, 22–24], whereas unground rice husk ash can be used as fine aggregate [1, 22]. Most  
of test results indicated that both the unit weight and compressive strength of bricks reduced, but the  
water absorption of bricks increased with the increase in rice husk content. With the use of 10% rice  
husk by weight, the unit weight and compressive strength of bricks could decline to around 1.15 T/m3  
and 0.5 MPa, respectively, and water absorption increased to 37.8% [18–20]. Similarly, Go¨rhan and  
S¸ims¸ek [21] investigated the use of rice husk as 5%, 10%, and 15% by volume of fired-clay brick. Test  
result showed that the unit weight, compressive strength, water absorption, and thermal conductivity  
of bricks ranged 1.28÷1.67 T/m3, 2.0÷9.0 MPa, 21.9÷37.8%, and 0.173÷0494 W/m.K, respectively.  
The utilization of rice husk in the production of cement brick has been investigated by Abdullah and  
Lee [25]. The cement bricks were made with 10%, 20%, and 30% rice husk by weight of the brick.  
The compressive strength and water absorption of bricks were respective 2.0÷6.0 MPa and 10÷50%.  
Most of the previous studies proved that rice husk and rice husk ash can be used in the production  
111  
Huy, N. S., et al. / Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering  
of fired-clay bricks and unfired bricks. Although the compressive strength decreased, water absorption  
increased, but the unit weight of bricks significantly declined to incorporate rice husk. Therefore, rice  
husk shows a great potential in the manufacture of lightweight bricks. However, the use of raw rice  
husk in the production of unfired building bricks is still limited. In this study, raw rice husk and  
bottom ash are used as fine aggregates, while fly ash is used as a binder material in the production of  
environmentally friendly unfired building bricks. The effect of raw rice husk content on the properties  
of green building bricks is investigated.  
2. Experimental program  
2.1. Materials  
In this study, the main compositions used to produce the unburnt brick samples includes cement,  
fly ash, bottom ash, and rice husk. The type-PC40 cement was taken from the Nghi Son factory  
with a specific gravity of 3.12. Both fly ash and bottom ash were sourced from Nghi Son thermal  
power plant in Thanh Hoa province with their respective densities of 2.16 T/m3 and 1.99 T/m3. The  
density, fineness modulus, moisture content, and water absorption of bottom ash were 1.08 T/m3,  
1.97, 17.06% and 23.15%, respectively. Rice husk was taken from a rice mill in Thanh Hoa city with  
its characteristics as the density of 1.068 T/m3, the bulk density of 0.098 T/m3, the fineness modulus  
of 3.38, and the water absorption of 3.7%. The low value of rice husk’s bulk density was proved  
by Mansaray and Ghaly’s study (from 0.086 to 0.114 T/m3) [26]. Table 1 shows the physical and  
chemical properties of cement and fly ash. Table 2 shows the sieve analysis and fineness modulus of  
bottom ash and rice husk.  
Table 1. Physical and chemical properties of raw materials  
Chemical compositions (% by weight)  
Density  
(g/cm3)  
LOI*  
(%)  
Materials  
SiO2  
Al2O3  
Fe2O3  
CaO  
MgO  
SO3  
Others  
Cement  
Fly ash  
3.12  
2.16  
0.41  
15.85  
21.23  
51.50  
5.50  
20.20  
4.90  
7.07  
61.02  
1.99  
2.97  
1.23  
1.47  
-
2.50  
2.16  
LOI* = Loss on ignition.  
Table 2. Sieve analysis and fineness modulus of bottom ash and rice husk  
Sieve size (mm)  
5.0  
Bottom ash 80.6 75.8 71.6 65.8  
Rice husk 69.6 34.4 34 31.6  
2.5  
1.25 0.63 0.315 0.14 FM*  
59.7  
31.2  
50  
1.97  
Percentage of passing (%)  
FM* = Fineness modulus  
2.2. Mixture proportions  
30.8 3.38  
Table 3 shows the mix proportions used for preparing various unfired building brick samples.  
The brick mixtures were designed with two water-to-binder (W/B) ratios of 0.30 and 0.35, denoted as  
M30 and M35, respectively. For each W/B ratio, the rice husk was used to replace 3%, 6%, and 9% of  
bottom ash content by mass. RH denotes rice husk, and the numbers 0, 3, 6, and 9 after it denote the  
percentage of rice husk to replace bottom ash in brick mixtures. Two control mixtures were designed  
112  
   
Huy, N. S., et al. / Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering  
Table 3. Mix proportions  
Mix proportions (kg/m3)  
W/B  
Mix  
notation  
Cement  
Fly ash  
Bottom ash  
Rice husk  
Water  
M30RH0  
M30RH3  
M30RH6  
M30RH9  
180.0  
177.4  
174.9  
172.4  
420.0  
413.9  
408.0  
402.3  
1128.3  
1078.7  
1030.4  
983.5  
0.0  
180.0  
177.4  
174.9  
172.4  
33.4  
65.8  
97.3  
0.30  
0.35  
M35RH0  
M35RH3  
M35RH6  
M35RH9  
154.3  
151.9  
149.6  
147.4  
360.0  
354.5  
349.1  
343.9  
1199.9  
1146.1  
1093.8  
1043.1  
0.0  
35.4  
69.8  
103.2  
180.0  
177.2  
174.6  
172.0  
without rice husk, referred to as M30RH0 and M35RH0. The content of cement and fly ash were  
respective 30% and 70% by weight of the total binder. Except cement was used with low content,  
other ingredients were industrial and agricultural wastes. In which, rice husk was utilized to reduce  
brick’s weight. The purpose of these designed mixtures is to investigate the effect of rice husk content  
on the properties of unfired building bricks.  
2.3. Sample preparation  
The content of all the brick ingredients was precisely prepared based on Table 3. Cement and fly  
ash were firstly mixed by the use of the laboratory mixing pan in two minutes. After that, bottom ash  
and rice husk were added and mixed for another two minutes. Then, water was gradually poured, and  
(a) Rice husk  
(b) Bottom ash  
Figure 1. Manufacturation of brick samples in the laboratory  
113  
(c) Test samples  
   
Huy, N. S., et al. / Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering  
the mixer continuously ran at moderate speed until a homogeneous mixture was obtained. Finally,  
the mixture was poured into a steel mold with dimensions of 160×85×40 mm and produced under  
forming pressure of around 0.5 MPa. The brick samples were immediately removed from the mold  
after casting and stored in in-door condition until testing as shown in Fig. 1.  
2.4. Test program  
In compliance with TCVN 6477:2016 [27], the properties of unfired building bricks including  
compressive strength, unit weight, and water absorption were tested. Other properties consisting of  
ultrasonic pulse velocity and thermal conductivity were also tested. It is noticed that the compressive  
strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity of brick samples were tested at 3, 7, 14, and 28 days of age,  
while other testes were conducted at 28 days of age. The reported values in this study are average  
of three measurements. The compressive strength, unit weight and water absorption were conducted  
in accordance with TCVN 6477:2016. Ultrasonic pulse velocity and thermal conductivity values of  
brick samples were directly measured by testing equipments such as MATEST C369 and ISOMET-  
2014, respectively. The ultrasonic pulse velocity was conducted on natural-dry samples according to  
ASTM 597 [28], while thermal conductivity was measured on saturated-surface-dry samples. The  
microstructure of bricks was also observed by using the scanning electron microscope provided by  
SEISS producer. All the compressive strength values presented herein were multiplied with 0.73,  
which is a coefficient factor reflecting the shape effect of the brick sample as stipulated in TCVN  
6477:2016.  
3. Results and discussion  
3.1. Unit weight  
1.6  
The correlation between rice husk content and  
unit weight of bricks is shown in Fig. 2. As  
M30  
1.5  
1.4  
1.3  
1.2  
1.1  
1
M35  
observed, when rice husk content changed from  
0% to 6%, the unit weight of bricks slightly re-  
duced from 1.56 T/m3 to 1.49 T/m3 and from  
1.49 T/m3 to 1.31 T/m3 corresponding to W/B ra-  
tios of 0.30 and 0.35. Since rice husk content in-  
creased up to 9%, the unit weight of bricks sig-  
nificantly dropped to 1.06÷1.08 T/m3. These val-  
ues are notably smaller than that of current cement  
bricks used in practice (around 2.0÷2.2 T/m3) [3].  
It is noticed that the bulk density of rice husk  
(0.098 T/m3) is really low due to the existence of  
gaps and voids among them. When the rice husk  
content is low, these gaps and voids were easily  
6
3
9
0
Rice husk content (%)  
Figure 2. Effect of rice husk content on unit  
weight of brick samples  
filled with cementitious paste. However, when its content increased, it is very difficult to compact and  
fulfill these gaps and voids by paste. This phenomenon is proved during the casting process of brick  
samples, and explained for the significant reduction in unit weight of brick samples with high rice  
husk content. This result shows a potential to apply rice husk in the production of lightweight bricks.  
On the other hand, the unit weight of bricks was slightly reduced with increasing the W/B ratio.  
This is explained that when the W/B ratio increased, then the water content increased and the binder  
114  
 
Huy, N. S., et al. / Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering  
content decreased. The density of water (1.0 T/m3) is smaller than that of cement (3.12 T/m3) and  
fly ash (2.16 T/m3). Another possible reason is due to the water evaporation during the hardening  
process. They leads to the reduction in unit weight of bricks as increasing W/B ratio.  
3.2. Compressive strength  
Compressive strength is a basic characteristic of bricks, then the grade of bricks is classified based  
on this property. The popular bricks used in practice for normal walls have a grade of from M3.5 to  
M7.5 corresponding to the compressive strength of from 3.5 MPa to 7.5 MPa. For lightweight bricks,  
the common compressive strength is around 3.5 MPa to 5.0 MPa. The development of compressive  
strength of all brick samples over time is shown in Fig. 3. Similarly to concrete, the compressive  
strength of brick samples with a W/B ratio of 0.3 is higher than that of the samples with a W/B ratio  
of 0.35. This is due to the effect of the W/B ratio on the strength development of cement hydration  
products. The compressive strength of M30 and M35 bricks felt within the range 4.22÷9.62 MPa and  
3.42÷5.75 MPa, respectively. These values are similar to compressive strength results from previous  
studies conducted by Sutas et al. [18] (0.5÷5.5 MPa), Silva et al. [19] (2.0÷3.55 MPa), Ponphuak  
et al. [20] (2.5÷16.2 MMPa), Go¨rhan and S¸ims¸ek [21] (2.0-9.0 MPa), and Abdullah and Lee [25]  
(2.0÷6.0 MPa).  
10  
10  
M30RH0  
M30RH3  
M30RH6  
M30RH9  
M35RH0  
M35RH3  
M35RH6  
M35RH9  
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
0
0
0
7
14  
21  
28  
0
7
14  
21  
28  
Curing time (days)  
Curing time (days)  
(a)  
(b)  
Figure 3. Compressive strength of (a) M30 and (b) M35 brick samples  
With an increase in the rice husk content, the compressive strength of bricks reduced. As afore-  
mentioned, the bulk density of rice husk is really slight due to the voids among them, leading the  
less compaction during the manufacturing of brick samples. This is the main cause leading to the  
reduction in compressive strength of bricks with the presence of rice husk. However, the compressive  
strength of bricks is still higher than 5.0 MPa (referred to as Grade M5.0) if the replacement of 3%  
bottom ash by rice husk (M30RH3 and M35RH3). When increasing the rice husk content to 6% and  
9%, the compressive strength of bricks is still higher than 3.42 MPa, could be classified as Grade  
M3.5. It demonstrated that rice husk can be utilized as fine aggregate in the production of unfired  
building bricks, at least considered as lightweight bricks. These rice husk bricks can be suitably used  
in temporary construction and non-load bearing walls due to the lightweight.  
115  
 
Huy, N. S., et al. / Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering  
3.3. Water absorption  
40  
35  
30  
25  
20  
15  
10  
5
The effect of rice husk content on water ab-  
sorption of brick samples is presented in Fig. 4.  
The water absorption value is often related to  
the compactness and density of the brick sample,  
so it is also related to the compressive strength  
value. According to Fig. 4, the water absorption of  
bricks slightly increased since the rice husk con-  
tent increased from 0% to 6% or the W/B ratio  
increased. Its value significantly increased when  
the rice husk content increased to 9%. These find-  
ings are associated with the change of brick’s unit  
weight as aforementioned. The higher water ab-  
sorption of bricks is attributed to the voids among  
rice husk particles. The water absorption of bricks  
in this study ranged from 12.4% to 35.3%. Al-  
M30  
M35  
0
6
3
9
0
Rice husk content (%)  
Figure 4. Effect of rice husk content on water  
absorption of brick samples  
though these values are really high in comparison with that of normal cement bricks. However, these  
results are similar to those results from previous studies, felt within the range 12.7% ÷ 37.8% [19–21].  
It is noticed that the water-resistance of bricks in practice will be enhanced by a layer of mortar.  
3.4. Ultrasonic pulse velocity  
Ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV in km/s) test is a non-destructive method, its result is related to  
the presence of voids and density of bricks. Figs. 5(a) and 5(b) exhibited the UPV values of tested  
samples corresponding to W/B ratios of 0.3 and 0.35, which were measured from 3-day to 28-day of  
bricks. The UPV of the M30 brick sample is higher than that of the corresponding M35 brick sample.  
This is due to the higher density of the M30 brick sample compared with the M35 brick sample. For  
the same W/B ratio, the UPV values of bricks declined with increasing rice husk content. At 28-day  
age, the UPV values of M30 brick samples were 2.89, 2.44, 1.94, and 1.25 km/s corresponding to rice  
3
2.5  
2
3
2.5  
2
1.5  
1
1.5  
1
M30RH0  
M30RH3  
M30RH6  
M30RH9  
M35RH0  
M35RH3  
M35RH6  
M35RH9  
0.5  
0
0.5  
0
0
7
14  
21  
28  
0
7
14  
21  
28  
Curing time (days)  
Curing time (days)  
(a)  
(b)  
Figure 5. Ultrasonic pulse velocity of (a) M30 and (b) M35 brick samples  
116  
   
Huy, N. S., et al. / Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering  
husk content of 0%, 3%, 6%, and 9%, respectively. Those were 2.61, 2.24, 1.66, and 1.18 km/s for  
the corresponding M35 brick samples. As mentioned above, the density of bricks reduced when rice  
husk content increased, resulting in reduction in UPV values. The low UPV value of brick samples  
is attributed to the voids among rice husk particles. It is demonstrated in previous studies [3, 29]  
that the UPV values and the compressive strength has a relationship. The bricks produced by the  
use of thermal power plant ashes had UPV values of 1.10÷1.77 km/s coressponding to compressive  
strength of 1.18÷7.7 MPa [3]. While the bricks used 5% rice husk ash and 5% surgarcane bagasse  
ash had UPV values of 1.16÷1.64 km/s [30]. In present study, at the rice husk content of 6% or  
higher, the UPV values of bricks ranged from 1.18 km/s to 1.94 km/s, similar to those values from  
previous studies [3, 30]. It is noticed that the compressive strength and unit weight of these bricks  
were around 3.42÷4.81 MPa and 1.06÷1.49 T/m3, considered as lightweight bricks. While other  
brick samples with rice husk content of 0% and 3% had compressive strength of 5.33÷9.62 MPa,  
unit weight of 1.46÷1.56 T/m3, resulting in UPV values of above 2.2 km/s. They may be considered  
as normal unfired building bricks. Depending on the actual requirements, the rice husk content is  
properly selected.  
3.5. Thermal conductivity  
0.7  
The lightweight bricks are usualy used in heat  
M30  
isolation structures, then the thermal conductivity  
test was conducted to assess the insulation capac-  
0.6  
M35  
0.5  
ity of these bricks in this study. The effect of rice  
husk content on the thermal conductivity of bricks  
is illustrated in Fig. 6. It can be seen in Fig. 6,  
0.4  
0.3  
the thermal conductivity of bricks decreased with  
0.2  
increasing rice husk content and W/B ratio. It  
was stated that the thermal conductivity of a brick  
0.1  
0
sample is related to its unit weight and porosity  
[3, 31]. When the rice husk content increased, the  
unit weight of bricks declined. Consequently, their  
thermal conductivity values reduced. The similar  
trend is observed when W/B ratio increased. In-  
corporating rice husk, the thermal conductivity of  
6
3
9
0
Rice husk content (%)  
Figure 6. Effect of rice husk content on thermal  
conductivity of brick samples  
bricks felt within the range of 0.201÷0.454 W/m.K. This range is similar to the result from Go¨rhan  
and S¸ims¸ek’s study [21]. It is noticed that Go¨rhan and S¸ims¸ek used rice husk in the production of  
fired-clay lightweight bricks. Their thermal conductivity ranged from 0.173 to 0.494 W/m.K. It is  
worth noting that the brick samples with 9% rice husk had a very low thermal conductivity values  
(0.201÷0.216 W/m.K). As the results, with low unit weight and low thermal conductivity, these rice  
husk bricks in this study is also suitably used in isolation structures.  
3.6. SEM observation  
The scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe the microstructure of bricks, espe-  
cially the connection between rice husk and paste. The SEM micrographs of unfired building bricks  
incorporating rice husk are shown in Figs. 7 and 8. These micrographs were taken on different samples  
with magnifications (denoted Mag) of 300, 500, and 1000 times. It is interesting that the connection  
between the back of rice husk and cementitious paste is greatly good as shown in Fig. 7, while many  
117  
 
Huy, N. S., et al. / Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering  
voids were detected around the connection between the belly of rice husk and paste as shown in Fig. 8.  
The spikes on the back of rice husk help them bond well with the cementitious paste. Therefore, when  
the rice husk content level is low (around 3%), the compressive strength of bricks is still good (higher  
than 5.0 MPa). Whereas, the gaps in the belly of rice husk are responsible for the low unit weight,  
UPV, thermal conductivity, compressive strength, and high water absorption. Consequently, if the rice  
husk content is high (6% and 9%), the quality of brick is significantly reduced. These findings are  
related to all test results presented above.  
(a) Mag = 300 X  
(b) Mag = 500 X  
(c) Mag = 1000 X  
Figure 7. The connection between back of rice husk and paste  
(a) Mag = 300 X  
(b) Mag = 500 X  
(c) Mag = 1000 X  
Figure 8. The connection between belly of rice husk and paste  
4. Conclusions  
In this study, raw rice husk and bottom ash were used as fine aggregates in the production of  
environmentally friendly unburnt bricks. In which, rice husk was used to substitute 0%, 3%, 6%, and  
9% of bottom ash content by weight. The brief conclusions can be drawn based on the experimental  
results as follows:  
- As the increase in rice husk content, the unit weight, compressive strength, UPV, the thermal  
conductivity of bricks decreased, while water absorption of bricks increased. However, all bricks  
produced in this study can be classified as Grade M3.5 or M5.0.  
- The unit weight and thermal conductivity of bricks are significantly dropped (1.06÷1.08 T/m3  
and 0.201÷0.216 W/m.K), when the rice husk content increased up to 9%. The tested bricks are  
118  
   
Huy, N. S., et al. / Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering  
suitably used in temporary construction and isolation structures. Depending on the actual requirement,  
the amount of rice husk is properly selected.  
- The back of the rice husk showed a good connection with cementitious paste, while the belly of  
the rice husk exhibited a poor connection. Many voids around the connection between belly of rice  
husk and cementitious paste were detected under the SEM image. This finding explained the poor  
properties of bricks containing high amount of rice husk.  
- This study showed that industrial wastes from thermal power plants (fly ash and bottom ash) and  
agricultural wastes (rice husk) located in Vietnam can potentially be used in the production of unfired  
bricks, especially the use of rice husk for lightweight bricks.  
Acknowledgment  
The experimental works were carried out at the construction material laboratory of the Depart-  
ment of Engineering and Technology, Hong Duc University. The author would like to thank Mai Thi  
Hong and Le Thi Thanh Tam, lecturers of Hong Duc University for their assistance in the experimental  
work.  
References  
eco-friendly construction bricks. Construction and Building Materials, 93:335–341.  
[2] Zhang, L. (2013). Production of bricks from waste materials – A review. Construction and Building  
Materials, 47:643–655.  
[3] Si-Huy, N., Thanh-Tam, L. T., Trong-Phuoc, H. (2020). Effects of NaOH Concentrations on Proper-  
Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed., 35(1):131–139.  
housing development. Construction and Building Materials, 16(8):519–525.  
[5] Cicek, T., Tanrıverdi, M. (2007). Lime based steam autoclaved fly ash bricks. Construction and Building  
Materials, 21(6):1295–1300.  
[6] Chindaprasirt, P., Pimraksa, K. (2008). A study of fly ash–lime granule unfired brick. Powder Technology,  
182(1):33–41.  
[7] Turgut, P. (2010). Masonry composite material made of limestone powder and fly ash. Powder Technol-  
ogy, 204(1):42–47.  
[8] Zhang, Z., Qian, J., You, C., Hu, C. (2012). Use of circulating fluidized bed combustion fly ash and slag  
in autoclaved brick. Construction and Building Materials, 35:109–116.  
using geopolymerization. Construction and Building Materials, 38:865–871.  
[10] Shakir, A. A., Naganathan, S., Mustapha, K. N. (2013). Properties of bricks made using fly ash, quarry  
dust and billet scale. Construction and Building Materials, 41:131–138.  
struction and Building Materials, 21(1):12–18.  
[12] Vinai, R., Lawane, A., Minane, J., Amadou, A. (2013). Coal combustion residues valorisation: Research  
and development on compressed brick production. Construction and Building Materials, 40:1088–1096.  
[13] Lawane, A., Minane, J. R., Vinai, R., Pantet, A. (2019). Mechanical and physical properties of stabilised  
[14] Naganathan, S., Mohamed, A. Y. O., Mustapha, K. N. (2015). Performance of bricks made using fly ash  
and bottom ash. Construction and Building Materials, 96:576–580.  
geopolymerization. Construction and Building Materials, 29:323–331.  
119  
                 
Huy, N. S., et al. / Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering  
[16] Roy, S., Adhikari, G. R., Gupta, R. N. (2007). Use of gold mill tailings in making bricks: a feasibility  
study. Waste Management & Research, 25(5):475–482.  
[17] Khan, R., Jabbar, A., Ahmad, I., Khan, W., Khan, A. N., Mirza, J. (2012). Reduction in environmental  
problems using rice-husk ash in concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 30:360–365.  
[18] Sutas, J., Mana, A., Pitak, L. (2012). Effect of Rice Husk and Rice Husk Ash to Properties of Bricks.  
Procedia Engineering, 32:1061–1067.  
properties of fired clay bricks. Journal of Building Engineering, 18:252–259.  
[20] Phonphuak, N., Saengthong, C., Srisuwan, A. (2019). Physical and mechanical properties of fired clay  
bricks with rice husk waste addition as construction materials. Materials Today: Proceedings, 17:1668–  
1674.  
[21] Go¨rhan, G., S¸ims¸ek, O. (2013). Porous clay bricks manufactured with rice husks. Construction and  
Building Materials, 40:390–396.  
[22] Hwang, C.-L., Huynh, T.-P., Risdianto, Y. (2016). An application of blended fly ash and residual rice husk  
ash for producing green building bricks. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 39(7):850–858.  
Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering (STCE) - NUCE, 11(6):104–110.  
[24] Phuoc, H. T., Hung, V. V., Tuan, B. L. A., Giang, P. H. H. (2020). Development of a cementless eco-  
Technology in Civil Engineering (STCE) - NUCE, 14(3):40–52.  
Husk, Corncob and Coconut Coir. Procedia Engineering, 180:1266–1273.  
[26] Mansaray, K. G., Ghaly, A. E. (1997). Physical and Thermochemical Properties of Rice Husk. Energy  
Sources, 19(9):989–1004.  
[27] TCVN 6477:2016. Concrete bricks. Ministry of Science and Technology, Vietnam.  
[28] ASTM C597 (2016). Standard tets method for pulse velocity through concrete. American Society of  
Testing Materials.  
[29] Bogas, J. A., Gomes, M. G., Gomes, A. (2013). Compressive strength evaluation of structural lightweight  
[30] Kazmi, S. M. S., Abbas, S., Munir, M. J., Khitab, A. (2016). Exploratory study on the effect of waste rice  
husk and sugarcane bagasse ashes in burnt clay bricks. Journal of Building Engineering, 7:372–378.  
reduced thermal conductivity. Ceramics International, 35(7):2625–2631.  
120  
                             
pdf 11 trang yennguyen 11560 Free
Bạn đang xem tài liệu "Environmentally friendly unburnt bricks using raw rice husk and bottom ash as fine aggregates: Physical and mechanical properties", để tải tài liệu gốc về máy hãy click vào nút Download ở trên

File đính kèm:

  • pdfenvironmentally_friendly_unburnt_bricks_using_raw_rice_husk.pdf