Transport of oil/water partitioning components during water injection

PETROVIETNAM  
PETROVIETNAM JOURNAL  
Volume 6/2021, pp. 37 - 42  
ISSN 2615-9902  
TRANSPORT OF OIL/WATER PARTITIONING COMPONENTS DURING  
WATER INJECTION  
Huynh Thi Thu Huong, Nguyen Huu Quang, Le Van Son, Tran Trong Hieu  
Centre for Applications of Nuclear Technique in Indusry, Vietnam Atomic Energy Institute  
Email: huonghtt@canti.vn  
Summary  
The oil/water partitioning components such as alkylphenols and aliphatic acids naturally exist in crude oil compositions at different  
initial concentrations of hundreds or even thousands of ppm depending on the location of the reservoir compared to the site of original  
rocks. During contact with sweeping injection brine, those compounds diffuse from oil phase to water phase due to oil/water partitioning  
behaviours. As a result, their concentration in oil contacting with water will be attenuating during water injection. Their concentration  
profile in water injection history contains the information related to diffusion in oil and water phase, interstitial velocity of water and oil  
saturation.  
This paper presents the research results of theoretical model and numerical model of the washed-out process of alkylphenols in the  
late stage of water injection. The research results have proposed approximate analytical expression for concentration of alkylphenols  
at the late stage of water flooding. In this regard, at the sufficient large injection volume the alkylphenol concentration attenuates  
exponentially and the attenuation rate depends on parameters such as partitioning coefficient, oil saturation and interstitial velocity  
of water and oil and diffusion coefficients. The simulation concentration results obtained from UTCHEM simulator for the 5-spot model  
showed a good match with analytical calculation results.  
The research results can be used as the basis for developing methods to assess water flooding systems as well as oil saturation. The  
results can also be used for study of transport of non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) in environmental contamination.  
Keywords: Residual oil saturation, waterflooding, tracer, partitioning organic compounds, enhanced oil recovery.  
1. Introduction  
Alkylphenols are aromatic compounds consisting of  
In the process where oil comes into contact with the  
injection water, because of oil/water partition properties  
the alkylphenols diffuse from oil phase to water phase,  
causing attenuation of their concentration in the two  
phases over time. The attenuation rate of alkylphenol  
concentration depends on several factors such as parti-  
tion coefficient, diffusion coefficient, interstitial velocity of  
phases, and the amount of remaining oil in pore volume.  
Sinha, Asakawa, and Pope proposed a method using alkyl-  
phenols as natural tracers to determine residual oil satu-  
ration in the swept area based on their residence time in  
water phase during water injection [6].  
phenol nuclei and alkyl groups generated by alkylation  
and isomerisation reactions in the source rock during  
petroleum formation. For years, the existence and origin  
of the organic phenolic compounds such as alkylphenols  
and aliphatic acids in petroleum have been studied as in-  
dicators to classify petroleum according to the origin of  
hydrocarbons as well as to indicate petroleum migration  
pathways [1 - 4]. The concentration distribution of alkyl-  
phenols and their oil/water partition characteristics were  
used by Taylor, Larter, and Dale to study petroleum migra-  
tion in the North Sea fields [4]. Lucach, Bowler, and Lar-  
ter studied the Dhahaban hydrocarbon system in Oman  
based on the distribution variation of alkylphenols [5].  
In Vietnam, the Tracer Laboratory of the Centre for  
Applications of Nuclear Techniques in Industry (Vietnam  
Atomic Energy Institute) has studied the transport of al-  
kylphenols during waterflooding in oil recovery since  
2014. The authors have proposed an analytical model de-  
scribing the attenuation of alkylphenol concentration in  
produced water over water injection time and conducted  
Date of receipt: 17/8/2020. Date of review and editing: 17/8 - 10/12/2020.  
Date of approval: 11/6/2021.  
PETROVIETNAM - JOURNAL VOL 6/2021  
37  
PETROLEUM EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION  
experiments to validate the analytical model  
[7 - 9]. The study results also considered the  
possibility of using alkylphenols as the natural  
partitioning tracers to evaluate oil saturation  
and determine the water contribution propor-  
tion of injection wells to production wells.  
The one-dimensional analytical solution describing the concen-  
tration of APs in water phase Cw(x, t) is described as:  
C *  
x - × t  
F
G
V
W
W
W
C
D
S
T
1
2
D
D
D
E
T
A
G
Cw  
(
x, t  
)
=
× C0 × 1+ Erf  
(5)  
T
G
B × t  
T
2
×
G
H
W
X
A
U
2. Theory  
in which, A, B and C* are parameters depending on APs partition  
coefficient, oil saturation, dispersion coefficient in phases, and pore  
velocity of water and oil:  
Alkylphenols (APs) are trace compositions  
in crude oil formed along with hydrocarbons  
during geochemical processes, which have  
the initial concentration in the oil phase in the  
range from several ppm to thousands of ppm  
depending on the field. During water injec-  
tion, alkylphenols diffuse from oil phase to wa-  
ter phase at the water-oil contact boundary in  
pore spaces.  
A = 1+  
B = 1− So  
C * =  
1− So  
At x = L when t ∞, the approximate form of LnCw is shown in  
(
K d 1  
D*Lw + Kd SoD*Lo  
v*wx + Kd Sov*ox  
)
So  
(
)
(
)
Equation (6):  
C*  
The advection-dispersion equation in oil-  
water phase contact of alkylphenols with the  
assumption that their concentration between  
phases instantaneously reaches equilibrium is  
expressed as Equation (1) [10]:  
F
V
S
C
B
A
2 C *  
D
T
W
GA  
G
C0 −1+e  
D
E
T
C*2  
1
2
W
U
Ln  
[Cw  
(
L,t →∞  
)
]
= −  
t−  
Ln  
(
t
)
+Ln  
(6)  
G
W
π
G
W
W
X
G
H
r
r
∂t  
.
φ
(
SwCw +Kd SoCw  
)
+.  
(
Swφv*Cw +Kd Soφv*oCw  
)
Equation (6) shows that the value of Ln(t) is very small compared  
w
(1)  
to t, so it can be considered that LnCw is approximately linear depen-  
dent on the time of water injection. Figure 1 illustrates LnCw according  
to Equation (5) and the approximate solution according to Equation  
(6), representing the attenuation of APs concentration with different  
partition coefficients in water phase over injection time. When injec-  
tion time t is sufficiently long or the injected volume is large enough,  
LnCw is almost linear over injection time, in which the slope of C*2/  
.  
[
(
S
wφ Dw* +K Soφ Do*  
).Cw  
]
= 0  
.
d
in which, ф is porosity of media, Cw is APs  
concentration in water phase [M/L3]; Sw and  
So are the saturation of water phase and oil  
phase, respectively (Sw + So = 1); Kd is APs parti-  
r
w
r*  
tion coefficient; v* and are interstitial veloc-  
vo  
ity of water phase and oil phase, respectively  
and Do* are dispersion tensors of APs  
*
20  
0
[L/T];  
Dw  
in water phase and oil phase, respectively  
[L2/T], t is time [T].  
Suppose that the porous media is infinite  
homogeneous, the saturation of the phases is  
constant, and the interstitial velocity of phases  
is constant in the pore, the initial and bound-  
ary conditions are as follows:  
-20  
-40  
-60  
+∞  
,0  
)
C
x+  
[
(
0,  
I
J
K
0
Initial condition:  
)(2)  
(3)  
Cw  
(
x,0  
)
=
0 x+  
0
200  
400  
600  
800  
Boundary condition:  
Cw  
(
- , t  
)
= 0  
Time since water injection  
Cw  
(
x, t  
)
Figure 1. Illustrating LnCw according to Equation (5) - solid lines and approximate solutions according to  
Equation (6) - dashed lines, for APs having Kd = 0.5, Kd = 1 and Kd = 2. When t is large, the value of LnCw  
decreases linearly over time. The smaller the Kd , the faster the time to reach the linear asymptotic.  
(4)  
= 0  
∂x  
x→ +∞  
PETROVIETNAM - JOURNAL VOL 6/2021  
38  
PETROVIETNAM  
(4AB) represents the decline rate of APs concentration during wa-  
ter sweeping. With the same injection conditions and oil satura-  
tion, the smaller the Kd is, the greater the dispersibility into water  
phase becomes and the faster the concentration decreases, and  
vice versa.  
in which, fo and fw are the oil cut and the water  
cut, respectively. Replace Equation (11) to Equa-  
tion (10):  
C
S2  
am  
ai  
fo  
f w  
fo  
K d + 2 K d  
D
D
T
=
(12)  
T
f w  
E
U
The slope is described as  
From the above equations, recall the decline  
rate of LnCw (L, t ∞) be the leaching rate at the  
late stage of water flooding:  
2
*
[
(
1− So  
)
]
×
vwx + Kd Sovo*x  
]
C *2  
(7)  
a =  
=
*
*
×
×
4×  
[
1+  
(
Kd −1  
)
S
(
1− So  
)
DLw +Kd S DLo  
]
×
×
[
×
×
×
o
o
C
S2  
fo  
f w  
DL*o+D*  
2
*2  
D
D
T
T
1+  
K d  
(
1So  
)
v
Let a = ai + am, in which:  
wx  
(13)  
E
U
2
*2  
a=  
2
4D* S2Kd2+4  
(
)
(
1S  
)
S Kd +4DL*w  
(
1S  
)
(
1− So  
)
v
×
wx  
(8)  
ai =  
Lo  
o
Lw  
o
o
o
2
*
2
4DLo So2 Kd + 4  
(
D *Lo + D *Lw  
)
(
1− So  
)
So K d + 4D*Lw  
(
1− So  
)
×
At the late stage of water flooding, oil is al-  
*2  
2
(
1− So  
(
)
So v*wx v*ox K d + So2 v K d2  
most immobile as also known as residual oil, fo  
= 0 and So = Sor, the attenuation of APs concen-  
tration in the production water is in accordance  
with the exponential law of the injection time or  
respectively the injection volume. Obviously, the  
decline rate depends on the partition coefficient  
of APs (Kd), the oil saturation (So), the dispersion  
coefficients of APs in phases (D*Lo, D*Lw) and the  
pore velocity of water v*wx.  
ox  
2 (9)  
am =  
4DL*o So2  
We have  
d2 + 4  
DL*o + D *Lw  
)
(
1− So  
)
So K d + 4D*Lw  
(
1− So  
)
S2  
T
U
C
S2  
*
am  
ai  
So  
1− So  
vox  
So  
1− So  
v*ox  
C
D
D
E
2
(10)  
(11)  
D
D
T
T
=
×
K d + 2 ×  
K
×
×
d
*
T
v wx  
v*wx  
E
U
and  
v*xo 1− So fo  
=
×
v*xw  
So  
f w  
3. Simulation results  
The advection-dispersion transport of APs  
from the oil phase into water phase during the  
water injection has been simulated on ¼ 5-spot  
models using UTCHEM (The University of Texas's  
Chemical Simulator software), developed by the  
University of Texas [11].  
UTCHEM was used to run 3D homogeneous  
single-layered reservoir models with ¼ 5-spot  
pattern, including 2 specific cases:  
• Immobile oil model having initial oil satura-  
tion and residual oil saturation of 0.35;  
• Mobile oil model having initial oil saturation  
of 0.65 and residual oil saturation of 0.35.  
The models have the size of 165 m × 165 m  
× 12 m divided into 55 × 55 × 4. The flow rate of  
injection water is 65.34 m3/d.  
The general parameters of the models are:  
- Porosity ф = 0.2, water viscosity μw = 0.7 cp,  
oil viscosity μo = 4 cp;  
- Longitudinal and transverse dispersivity  
are αDL = 0.03 m, αDT = 0.003 m;  
Figure 2. Illustration of APs concentration distribution in space at water injection of 0.6 PV in mobile  
oil model (Soi = 0.65, Sor = 0.35).  
PETROVIETNAM - JOURNAL VOL 6/2021  
39  
PETROLEUM EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION  
Table 1. The partition coefficient Kd of APs and initial concentration of APs used in the models  
Partitioning coeꢀcient  
Initial concentration in oil  
Initial concentration in  
water phase (mg/L)  
Alkylphenols  
phase (mg/L)  
Kd = Co Cw  
Phenol  
0.16  
0.58  
0.75  
1.34  
1.61  
3.09  
7.37  
1.6  
5.8  
10  
10  
10  
10  
10  
10  
10  
4-Methylphenol (4MP)  
2-Methylphenol (2MP)  
4-Propylphenol (4PP)  
3,4-Dimethylphenol (34DMP)  
2,4-Dimethylphenol (24DMP)  
4-Ethylphenol (4EP)  
7.5  
13.4  
16.1  
30.9  
73.7  
- Relative permeability curve is  
described by Corey model: critical water  
saturation Scwr = 0.3, residual oil saturation  
Sor = 0.35, water endpoint: 0.15, oil endpoint  
0.85, water exponent: 1.5, oil exponent: 2,  
endpoint mobility ratio: 1.  
1.0E+02  
1.0E-01  
1.0E-04  
1.0E-07  
1.0E-10  
1.0E-13  
Phenol  
4MP  
2MP  
The APs initial concentration in oil phase  
and water phase and partition coefficient be-  
tween phases determined in the experimen-  
tal data of the Tracer Laboratory of CANTI are  
listed in Table 1. All compounds are supposed  
to have the same density, alkane number and  
chemical properties but different in partition  
coefficient.  
4PP  
34DMP  
24DMP  
4EP  
0
2
4
6
8
10  
Injected pore volume (PV)  
The water injection takes place up to 10  
PV of the model to investigate the APs con-  
centration decrease at the end of the injection  
stage. It is assumed that the concentration of  
APs between phases instantaneously reaches  
equilibrium while oil and water are in contact.  
Figure 2 illustrates the spatial concentration  
distribution of APs at water injection of 0.6 PV  
for the mobile oil model.  
(a)  
1.OE+02  
1.OE-01  
1.OE-04  
Phenol  
4MP  
2MP  
1.OE-07  
1.OE-10  
1.OE-13  
4PP  
34DMP  
24DMP  
4EP  
Figure 3 shows the concentration of APs  
in produced water in both models, in which  
the smaller the Kd is, the faster the leaching  
rate becomes, and vice versa.  
0
2
4
6
8
10  
Injected pore volume (PV)  
The concentration obtained from calcula-  
tion of the analytical solution in accordance  
with Equation (5) matches well with the simu-  
lation data in both models of mobile and im-  
mobile oil at the late stage of water injection  
(> 2 PV). The root mean square error (RMSE)  
between the simulation data and the calcula-  
(b)  
Figure 3. Concentration curves of APs in produced water of the ¼ 5-spot having immobile oil (Soi = Sor = 0.35,  
a) and the ¼ 5-spot having mobile oil (Soi = 0.65 Sor = 0.35, b). Solid lines present the simulation data from  
UTCHEM software, while dashed lines present the calculation results of Equation (5).  
tion data during the injection stage is shown in Table 2. The results  
show that the value of RMSE from 0 - 2 PV is greater than that at the  
PETROVIETNAM - JOURNAL VOL 6/2021  
40  
PETROVIETNAM  
Table 2. The root mean square error (RMSE) between the simulation data and the analytical solution during the injection stage  
Phenol  
(Kd = 0.16) (Kd = 0.58)  
4MP  
2MP  
(Kd = 0.75)  
4PP  
(Kd = 1.34)  
34DMP  
(Kd = 1.61)  
24DMP  
(Kd = 3.09)  
4EP  
(Kd = 7.37)  
Water injection (PV)  
Immobile oil model  
1.813  
0 - 1  
1 - 2  
2 - 3  
3 - 4  
4 - 5  
5 - 10  
1.445  
0.080  
1.585  
0.130  
1.638  
0.150  
1.883  
0.220  
0.064  
0.009  
0.001  
< 0.001  
1.174  
1.930  
0.183  
0.062  
0.015  
0.002  
0.123  
1.950  
2.382  
0.177  
0.197  
0.059  
0.170  
0.003  
0.010  
0.015  
0.044  
< 0.001  
< 0.001  
< 0.001  
< 0.001  
< 0.001  
< 0.001  
< 0.001  
< 0.001  
< 0.001  
0.005  
< 0.001  
< 0.001  
Mobile oil model  
1.744  
0 - 1  
1 - 2  
2 - 3  
3 - 4  
4 - 5  
5 - 10  
1.115  
0.118  
1.377  
0.161  
1.469  
0.169  
1.849  
0.169  
0.029  
0.007  
0.003  
< 0.001  
1.285  
1.939  
0.109  
0.025  
0.004  
0.002  
0.215  
2.103  
2.469  
0.118  
0.144  
0.046  
0.147  
0.001  
0.004  
0.006  
0.018  
< 0.001  
< 0.001  
< 0.001  
0.002  
0.003  
0.007  
< 0.001  
< 0.001  
< 0.001  
< 0.001  
0.002  
< 0.001  
end of the injection stage, in which the APs with higher Kd  
represents the higher RMSE value.  
tem as well as oil saturation. The results can also be used  
for study of transport of non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL)  
in environmental contamination.  
5. Conclusions  
Acknowledgements  
The analytical solution of the advection-dispersion  
equation describing the attenuation of concentration of  
APs compounds in produced water was approximated as  
an exponential function at the late stage of water flood-  
ing when the injection time or injected volume is large  
(>1 PV). The analytical solution was validated by applying  
the ¼ 5-spot model to calculate the concentration of 7 AP  
compounds to compare with the results of numerical sim-  
ulation using UTCHEM simulator. The results show that,  
when the injection time is large enough to reach injec-  
tion of 2 PV or more, the approximate analytical solution  
matches quite well with the simulation results. The RMSE  
value is less than 0.2 for the APs having Kd less than 3. The  
analytical solution also shows that the APs concentration  
in produced water decreases exponentially over injection  
time and the factors affect the concentration attenuation  
rate include partition coefficient, diffusion coefficients,  
interstitial velocity and oil saturation. The approximate  
solution obtained in this study provides a better under-  
standing of the factors influencing the attenuation of the  
APs concentration than the semi-experimental formula  
proposed by Huseby et al [10].  
This research work has been implemented through  
the Project entitled “Study on the application of oil satu-  
ration determination method using partitioning organic  
compounds in oilfields” under the grant of Vietnam’s Min-  
istry of Science and Technology.  
References  
[1] Marisa Ioppolo - Armanios, The occurrence and  
orrigins of some alkylphenols in crude oils. Curtin University  
of Technology, 1996.  
[2] Steve Later and Barry Bennet,Now you see them,  
now you don’t, now you might see them again! A review of  
the systematics of alkylphenol occurrence in conventional  
and heavy oil petroleum systems, 2011 CSPG/CSEG/CWLS  
Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 9 - 11 May, 2011.  
[3] B.Bennett and S.R.Larter, “Partition behaviour of  
alkylphenols in crude oil/brine systems under subsurface  
conditions, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 61,  
No. 20, pp. 4393 - 4402, 1997. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-  
7037(97)88537-7.  
The research results can be used as the basis for devel-  
oping the methods of assessment of water flooding sys-  
[4] Paul Taylor, Steve Larter, Martin Jones, Jason Dale,  
and Idar Horstad,“The effect of oil-water-rock partitioning  
PETROVIETNAM - JOURNAL VOL 6/2021  
41  
PETROLEUM EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION  
on the occurrence of alkylphenols in petroleum systems,  
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 61, No. 9, pp. 1899  
- 1910, 1997.  
from crude oil, Petrovietnam Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 24 - 29,  
2019.  
[9] To Ba Cuong, Nguyen Hong Phan, and  
Nguyen Huu Quang, Interwell tracer method using  
partitioning compounds naturally existing in crude oil  
for determination of residual oil saturation, Petrovietnam  
Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 38 - 43, 2016.  
[5] Sandra O.Lucach, Bernard F.J.Bowler, Neil Frewin,  
and Steve R.Larter, “Variation in alkylphenol distributions  
in a homogeneous oil suite form the Dhahaban petroleum  
system of Oman, Organic Geochemistry, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp.  
581 - 594, 2002.  
[10] Olaf Huseby, A.Haugan, J.Sagen, Jiri Muller, Barry  
Bennett, S.R.Larter, Eustathios S.Kikkinides, A.K.Stubos,  
Faraz Yousefian, Jean-Francois Thovert, and P.M.Adler,  
“Transport of organic components from immobile  
and bypassed oil in porous media, Applied Chemical  
Engineering, Vol. 49, No. 5, pp. 1085 - 1094, 2003. DOI:  
10.1002/aic.690490504.  
[6] R.Sinha, K.Asakawa, G.A.Pope, and K.Sepehmoori,  
“Simulation of natural and partitioning interwell tracers to  
calculate saturation and swept volumes in oil reservoirs,  
SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa,  
Oklahoma, 17 - 21 April 2004.  
[7] Nguyễn Hồng Phan, Nguyễn Hữu Quang, Tô Bá  
Cường, Huỳnh Thị Thu Hương, và nnk, “Phát triển mô hình  
mô phỏng quá trình vận động của các chất chỉ thị tự nhiên  
(NPIT) để đánh giá trữ lượng dầu trong khai thác”, Viện Năng  
lượng Nguyên tử Việt Nam.  
[11] Center for Petroleum and Geosystems  
Engineering, University of Texas, “Reservoir engineering  
research program. Volume II: Technical documentation  
for UTCHEM - 9.0 - A three-dimensional chemcical flood  
oy2b17l2qo85afq62g.kr/download/gms/UTCHEM_Tech_  
Doc.pdf.  
[8] Huynh Thi Thu Huong, Le Thanh Tai, Nguyen Huu  
Quang, and Le Van Son, “Determination of contribution  
proportion of injection wells in oil production by interwell  
tracer method using partitioning organic compounds  
PETROVIETNAM - JOURNAL VOL 6/2021  
42  
pdf 6 trang yennguyen 20/04/2022 1600
Bạn đang xem tài liệu "Transport of oil/water partitioning components during water injection", để tải tài liệu gốc về máy hãy click vào nút Download ở trên

File đính kèm:

  • pdftransport_of_oilwater_partitioning_components_during_water_i.pdf