The journal of Nuclear Science and Technology - Volume 9, Number 3, September 2019

ISSN 1810-5408  
Nuclear Science  
and Technology  
Volume 9, Number 3, September 2019  
Published by  
VIETNAM ATOMIC ENERGY SOCIETY  
VIETNAM ATOMIC ENERGY INSTITUTE  
NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY  
Volume 9, Number 3, September 2019  
Editorial Board  
Editor-in-chief  
Tran Huu Phat (VINATOM)  
Executive Editors  
Vuong Huu Tan (VARANS)  
Tran Chi Thanh (VINATOM)  
Cao Dinh Thanh (VINATOM)  
Hoang Anh Tuan (VAEA)  
Editors  
Nguyen Kien Cuong (VINATOM)  
Nguyen Nhi Dien (VINATOM)  
Nguyen Thi Kim Dung (VINATOM)  
Ho Manh Dung (VINATOM)  
Nguyen Nam Giang (VINATOM)  
Trinh Van Giap (VINATOM)  
Le Ngoc Ha (108 Military Central Hospital)  
Phan Son Hai (VINATOM)  
Le Hong Khiem (IOP)  
Dao Tien Khoa (VINATOM)  
Tran Hoai Nam (Duy Tan University)  
Dang Duc Nhan (VINATOM)  
Nguyen Hao Quang (VINATOM)  
Nguyen Mong Sinh (VINATOM)  
Tran Duc Thiep (IOP)  
Dang Quang Thieu (VINATOM)  
Le Ba Thuan (VINATOM)  
Le Huy Ham (VAAS)  
Nguyen Quoc Hien (VINATOM)  
Le Van Hong (VINATOM)  
Nguyen Trung Tinh (VARANS)  
Tran Ngoc Toan (VINATOM)  
Duong Thanh Tung (VARANS)  
Nguyen Nu Hoai Vi (VARANS)  
Nguyen Tuan Khai (VINATOM)  
Pham Dinh Khang (VINATOM)  
Science Secretary  
Hoang Sy Than (VINATOM)  
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................  
Copyright: ©2008 by the Vietnam Atomic Energy Society (VAES), Vietnam Atomic Energy Institute  
(VINATOM).  
Pusblished by  
Vietnam Atomic Energy Society, 59 Ly Thuong Kiet, Hanoi, Vietnam  
Tel: 84-24-39420463 Fax: 84-24-39424133 Email: [email protected]  
Vietnam Atomic Energy Institute, 59 Ly Thuong Kiet, Hanoi, Vietnam  
Tel: 84-24-39420463 Fax: 84-24-39422625 Email: [email protected]  
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................  
Contents  
Nuclear Transmutation of Long-Lived Fission Product I-129 in Radial Blanket of  
Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor  
Peng Hong Liem, Donny Hartanto, Yoshihisa Tahara, Naoyuki Takaki…………………... 01  
Calculation Results for Enhancing Ability of I-131 Radioisotope Production Using  
Tellurium Dioxide Target on the Dalat Nuclear Research Reactor  
Kien Cuong Nguyen, Ton Nghiem Huynh, Vinh Vinh Le, Ba Vien Luong, Quang Huy  
Pham, Quoc Duong Tran, Van Cuong Bui …………………………………………..……..... 09  
Modeling of the Dalat Nuclear Research Reactor (DNRR) with the Serpent 2 Monte  
Carlo code  
Nguyen Kien Cuong, Nguyen Thi Dung, Tran Viet Phu, Nguyen Huu Tiep, Pham Nhu  
Viet Ha……………………………………………………………………………………………... 21  
High-resolution fission studies with the planned GBS facility at ELI-NP  
D. Choudhury, L. Csige, A.J. krasznahorkay, D.L. balabanski, P. Constantin, M.  
Csatlós, J. Gulyás, A. Oberstedt………………………………………………………….......... 30  
Applications of Electron Beam to Environmental Conservation  
Koichi Hirota ………...…………………………………………………………………..……… 38  
Temporal variation of stable isotopic values for dissolved nitrogen compounds in paddy  
water environment  
Makoto Saiki, Thu Nga Do, Thi Thuy Hai Cao, Takashi Nakamura, Thi Thao Ta, Kei  
Nishida…………………………………………………………………………..…..…….. 42  
Study on the isomeric decay of neutron-rich isotope 67Fe  
L. X. Chung, P.-A. Söderström, A. Corsi, P. Doornenbal, A. Gillibert, P. D. Khue, B. D.  
Linh, S. Nishimura, A. Obertelli, N. D. Ton..……………………………………….……..  
48  
Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol.9, No. 3 (2019), pp. 01-08  
Nuclear Transmutation of Long-Lived Fission Product I-129 in  
Radial Blanket of Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor  
Peng Hong Liem 1,2,*, Donny Hartanto3, Yoshihisa Tahara1 and Naoyuki Takaki1  
1Nippon Advanced Information Service (NAIS Co., Inc.),  
416 Muramatsu, Tokai-mura, Naka-gun Ibaraki, Japan  
2Tokyo City University (TCU), 1-28-1 Tamazutsumi, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan  
3University of Sharjah, P.O. BOX 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates  
(Received 07 November 2019, accepted 25 November 2019)  
Abstract: An investigation on the nuclear transmutation of elemental long-lived fission product  
(LLFP) in a fast reactor is being conducted focusing on the I-129 LLFP (half-life 15.7 million  
years) to reduce the environmental burden. The LLFP assembly is loaded into the radial blanket  
region of a Japanese MONJU class sodium-cooled fast reactor (710 MWth, 148 days/cycle). The  
iodine element containing I-129 LLFP (without isotope separation) is mixed with YD2 and/or YH2  
moderator material to enhance the nuclear transmutation rate. We studied the optimal moderator  
volume fraction to maximize the transmutation rate (TR, %/year) and the support factor (SF is  
defined as the ratio of transmuted to produced LLFP). We also investigated the effect of LLFP  
assembly loading position in the radial blanket and the severe power peak appeared at the fuel  
assembly adjacent to the LLFP assembly.  
Keywords: Nuclear transmutation, long-lived fission product, I-129, radial blanket, sodium-cooled  
fast reactor.  
first by elemental separation of MAs and  
LLFPs from HLRW using chemical processes  
(partitioning) and then followed by nuclear  
reactions of the MAs and LLFPs into short-  
lived or stable nuclides (transmutation). The  
transmutation can be done in a nuclear reactor  
or in an accelerator-driven transmutation  
system (ADS).  
I. INTRODUCTION  
Transmutation of long-lived fission  
products (LLFPs: Se-79, Zr-93, Tc-99, Pd-  
107, I-129, and Cs-135) into short-lived or  
stable nuclides by fast neutron spectrum  
reactors is being revisited in Japan [1]. The  
geological disposal of high-level radioactive  
wastes (HLRW) as the nuclear fuel cycle by-  
products raises public concern in Japan and  
many other countries since even after  
thousands of years, minor actinides (MAs)  
and some LLFPs remain and become the main  
contributors of the radioactive hazard. Under  
the partitioning and transmutation (P&T)  
strategy, research and development efforts are  
being conducted to reduce the radioactive  
waste to be stored and the above-mentioned  
long-term hazard for future generations [2].  
The P&T strategy in general is implemented  
In this present study, we focus on the  
transmutation of one LLFP, i.e. I-129 (half-life  
15.7 million years) using a sodium-cooled fast  
reactor, in particular in the radial blanket  
region.  
I-129 is selected in the present study  
since  
the  
chemical  
compound  
and  
manufacturing of this LLFP have been  
previously investigated [3]. The investigation  
concluded that BaI2 is the suitable chemical  
compound for this particular LLFP from the  
©2019 Vietnam Atomic Energy Society and Vietnam Atomic Energy Institute  
NUCLEAR TRANSMUTATION OF LONG-LIVED FISSION PRODUCT I-129 IN …  
points of view of chemical stability and easy  
manufacturing process. As mentioned before,  
the iodine from the partitioning process does  
not experience isotope separation process that  
is the LLFP iodine element consists of  
approximately 76 at % of I-129 and the rest I-  
127, if we assume that the LLFP iodine  
originated from a spent mixed oxide (MOX)  
fuel of a fast breeder reactor core at 80 GWd/t  
(two years of irradiation). The I-129 LLFP  
irradiated in a sodium-cooled fast reactor will  
transmute into I-130 by neutron capture  
reaction and then decay (half-life 15.5 second)  
into stable Xe-130.  
capability will be lower. However, for Japan,  
the accumulated surplus of plutonium may be  
one argument for not pursuing a high breeding  
ratio. Although Japan has decided to close  
MONJU fast reactor in December 2016,  
scientific knowledge, design, engineering and  
technical experiences as well as high quality  
measurement data are well accumulated and  
documented. Therefore, in this study we use  
MONJU as the fast reactor system for the  
LLFP transmutation (readers are referred to  
JNC TN 4520 2004-001 document for detail  
descriptions of MONJU reactor). Findings and  
conclusions from this study should be also  
valid in other similar fast reactor systems.  
A sodium-cooled fast reactor is selected  
in the present study because of its high excess  
neutrons and high neutron flux available for  
the transmutation. Radial blanket regions of a  
fast reactor can be used for the proposed  
LLFP transmutation since they provide large  
space (volume) while the core characteristics  
of the fast reactor are not significantly  
affected. One important fast reactor  
characteristic which is expected to be affected  
is the reactor breeding capability. By  
replacing radial blanket sub-assemblies (S/As)  
containing depleted uranium with LLFP S/As  
containing BaI2, the reactor breeding  
II. TRANSMUTATION OF I-129 LLFP  
The MONJU reactor core layout for the  
proposed I-129 LLFP transmutation is shown  
in Fig. 1. The reactor has a nominal power of  
710 MWth and under this nominal power it is  
typically operated in 148 days per core cycle.  
From Fig. 1, one can observe that the reactor  
core consists of inner and outer core regions,  
and the core is surrounded by a radial blanket  
region. The radial blanket region is occupied  
by three layers of S/As.  
Fig. 1. Japanese MONJU reactor configuration and dimension (left), and fuel and radial blanket S/A (right).  
A radial blanket S/A may be replaced by the same dimension of a LLFP S/A.  
2
PENG HONG LIEM et al.  
It is obvious that the first layer of the  
irradiation. For enhancing the I-129  
transmutation, the volume fraction between  
BaI2 and moderator material will be optimized.  
The use of a moderator material in the LLFP  
S/A is expected to increase the power peaking  
factor (PPF) of fuel pins adjacent to the LLFP  
S/A. Therefore, in the present study we also  
estimate the PPF of the fuel pins of the most  
outer fuel S/As in the outer core region.  
radial blanket will have the highest neutron  
flux and the hardest neutron spectrum.  
However, since the mean free path of fast  
neutrons is comparable to the radial blanket  
S/A dimension, still moderately high neutron  
flux can be expected in the second and the  
last layers. In this study, the performance of  
I-129 transmutation is investigated by  
loading the I-129 LLFP S/As in the first,  
second or third layers, as well as in several  
combinations of layers.  
100  
10-1  
10-2  
10-3  
10-4  
10-5  
10-6  
10-7  
10-8  
104  
103  
102  
101  
100  
10-1  
10-2  
10-3  
10-4  
Blanket layer 1  
The effectiveness of LLFP (including  
I-129) nuclides depends on both the neutron  
flux level and LLFP capture cross sections,  
namely the product of the two parameters. A  
sodium-cooled fast reactor can provide a  
high neutron flux level however in general  
the LLFP neutron capture cross sections are  
low in fast spectrum regimes as shown in  
Fig. 2. For I-129, the neutron capture cross  
section shows 1/v behavior in the thermal  
energy region, followed by many resolved  
resonances from several tens eV up to  
several kilos eV. The neutron capture cross  
section at 0.0253 eV and resonance integral  
of I-129 are approximately 30 and 33 barns  
(Shibata et al., 2011). On the other hand, in  
the same figure, the neutron spectrum of the  
blanket first layer is also shown. The neutron  
spectrum shows higher contributions in keV  
to MeV energy range. These data suggest  
that softer neutron spectra than the one of a  
typical sodium-cooled fast reactor will  
enhance the neutron capture and increase the  
transmutation rate of I-129.  
I-129 (n,g) I-130  
10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102  
Energy (MeV)  
Fig. 2. I-129 LLFP capture cross section (JENDL-4.0).  
To evaluate quantitatively the I-129  
transmutation effectiveness in a fast reactor,  
the following performance indices are defined:  
( )  
( )  
( )  
N 0 − N T  
(
)
Transmutation Rate TR ≡  
T × N 0  
≈ 휎퐶퐿퐿퐹푃  
∅
(1)  
푇푎푟푔푒푡  
( )  
N 0 − N(T)  
γ × F × T  
퐿퐿퐹푃  
Support Factor (SF) ≡  
퐿퐿퐹푃  
푁
≈ (훾  
퐹) (∅푇푎푟푔푒푡) (푁  
)
퐹푖푠푠푖푙푒  
퐶표푟푒  
(2)  
휎
푇푎푟푔푒푡  
푐
퐿퐿퐹푃  
휎
∅
퐶표푟푒  
퐹
where N(0) and T are the number of  
initial atoms of I-129 in a LLFP S/A and the  
irradiation period, respectively, while and F  
are the I-129 yield per fission and the total  
fission rate of the core, respectively. From the  
definition, it is clear that TR is the ratio of the  
initially loaded I-129 to the amount of the  
transmuted I-129 in the LLFP S/A per unit  
In the present study, yttrium deuteride  
(YD2) and yttrium hydride (YH2) moderator  
materials are adopted for softening the neutron  
spectrum in the LLFP S/A. Yttrium is superior  
due to its low absorption cross section and does  
not produce long-lived daughters during  
3
NUCLEAR TRANSMUTATION OF LONG-LIVED FISSION PRODUCT I-129 IN …  
time. On the other hand, SF indicates the ratio  
of the amount of transmuted I-129 to the  
amount of I-129 produced in the core over the  
same period of time.  
height of approximately 5 cm for burnup  
calculation. The LLFP S/A was modeled as a  
homogeneous mixture of BaI2 and moderator  
material. For each predictor-corrector burnup  
step, the effective and skip numbers of  
generations (10,000 histories per generation)  
were 100 and 20, respectively. The core  
characteristics and transmutation performance  
were evaluated at the beginning of cycle (BOC,  
0 day), middle of cycle (MOC, 74 days) and  
end of cycle (EOC, 148 days). The reactor is  
assumed to be operated at its nominal power  
(710 MWth) with all control rods fully  
withdrawn.  
As mentioned above, TR is strongly  
dependent on the product of I-129 effective  
microscopic capture cross section and the  
neutron flux level. The performance index SR  
is needed because during the I-129  
transmutation in the blanket region, the reactor  
core also produces I-129. If the condition of  
SR>1.0 can be achieved, then the self-  
produced I-129 can be transmuted (eliminated)  
during electric power generation.  
B. Analysis Results and Discussions  
III. ANALYSIS AND RESULTS  
The  
performance  
of  
I-129  
A. Analytical Tools, Library and Calculation  
Model  
transmutation in the radial blanket region of  
MONJU reactor is summarized in Table I &  
Fig. 3 and Table II Fig. 4 for YD2 and YH2  
moderator material, respectively. The I-129  
LLFP S/As are loaded into the first, second  
and third layer of the radial blanket region,  
or the combination of them. The BaI2 volume  
fraction is varied from 100 % volume (no  
moderator material) to 10 %.  
The continuous energy Monte Carlo  
SERPENT2 code [4] with JENDL-4.0 library  
[5] was used for the neutronics and burnup  
analysis. The MONJU reactor was modeled in  
2-D R-Z geometry to reduce the overall  
calculation time. In the axial (Z) direction, a  
fuel S/A was divided into many zones with the  
YD2 Moderator  
YH2 Moderator  
10  
8
25  
25  
20  
15  
10  
5
10  
8
SF Lay. 1, 2, 3  
SF Lay. 1, 2  
SF Lay. 1  
TR Lay. 1, 2, 3  
TR Lay. 1, 2  
TR Lay. 1  
SF Lay. 1, 2, 3  
SF Lay. 1, 2  
SF Lay. 1  
TR Lay. 1, 2, 3  
TR Lay. 1, 2  
TR Lay. 1  
20  
15  
10  
5
6
6
4
4
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
20  
40  
60  
80  
100  
0
20  
40  
60  
80  
100  
BaI2 Volume Fraction (%)  
BaI2 Volume Fraction (%)  
Fig.3. Performance of I-129 transmutation in LLFP  
Fig. 4. Performance of I-129 transmutation in LLFP  
S/A using YD2 moderator material.  
S/A using YH2 moderator material.  
4
PENG HONG LIEM et al.  
Table I. Performance of I-129 transmutation in LLFP S/A using YD2 moderator material.  
BaI2  
[%v]  
Mod  
[%v]  
Layer  
1
Layer  
2
Layer  
3
TR  
[%/y]  
SF  
PPF  
100  
70  
0
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
0.74  
1.17  
1.77  
3.37  
1.60  
1.04  
0.68  
1.36  
0.91  
2.32  
1.47  
0.97  
2.06  
1.35  
3.80  
2.38  
1.56  
3.83  
2.43  
12.6  
14.0  
12.1  
5.8  
6.0  
4.4  
2.9  
10.7  
7.6  
5.0  
3.5  
2.3  
9.3  
6.5  
2.0  
1.4  
0.9  
4.3  
2.9  
0.89  
0.93  
1.13  
1.50  
0.94  
30  
60  
90  
30  
40  
10  
70  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
0.94  
1.10  
40  
60  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
1.13  
1.37  
10  
90  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
YD2  
1.50  
First  
the  
I-129  
transmutation  
layer pairs (layer 1 & 2, layer 2 &3). The  
largest TR value (3.83) is found for the 1 &2  
layer pair with BaI2 volume fraction of 10 %,  
while the largest SF value (14.0) is found for  
the case of LLFP S/As loaded in all layers with  
BaI2 volume fraction of 70 %. Concerning the  
PPF, severe PPF values appear if LLFP S/As  
are located in the first layer, in particular for  
cases with a high volume fraction of moderator  
material. For the case with the highest volume  
fraction of moderator material (90 %), the PPF  
is approximately 1.50.  
performance of LLFP S/A with YD2 moderator  
material is discussed. For cases where all three  
layers are loaded with LLFP S/As, increasing  
the moderator volume fraction (or equivalently  
decreasing the BaI2 volume fraction) softens  
the neutron spectrum and enhances the TR  
values, but decreases the SF values. When  
LLFP S/As loaded location is varied from a  
single layer 1, 2 and 3, both the TR and SF  
values decrease because of lower neutron flux  
levels. Similar trends are observed for varied  
5
NUCLEAR TRANSMUTATION OF LONG-LIVED FISSION PRODUCT I-129 IN …  
Table II. Performance of I-129 transmutation in LLFP S/A using YH2 moderator material.  
BaI2  
[%v]  
Mod  
[%v]  
Layer  
1
Layer  
2
Layer  
3
TR  
[%/y]  
SF  
PPF  
100  
70  
0
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
0.74  
12.6  
0.89  
1.41  
2.03  
2.74  
1.55  
30  
60  
90  
30  
1.46  
2.26  
3.58  
2.44  
1.55  
0.96  
1.90  
1.20  
4.38  
2.68  
1.57  
3.16  
1.89  
7.44  
4.35  
2.44  
5.12  
2.92  
1.37  
17.4  
15.4  
6.1  
40  
10  
70  
9.2  
YH2  
6.5  
YH2  
YH2  
4.1  
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
15.0  
10.0  
9.5  
1.43  
2.18  
40  
10  
70  
60  
90  
30  
YH2  
6.5  
YH2  
YH2  
3.8  
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
14.2  
9.1  
2.04  
2.84  
4.0  
YH2  
2.7  
YH2  
1.5  
YH2  
YD2  
YH2  
YH2  
YH2  
5.8  
2.74  
0.96  
YH2  
YH2  
3.5  
16.3  
Secondly the transmutation performance  
of LLFP S/A with YH2 moderator material is  
discussed. Compared to deuterium, hydrogen  
mass is half therefore it is expected that with the  
same nuclide density hydrogen moderates  
significantly better than the deuterium does.  
However, at the same time the use of hydrogen is  
expected to increase the PPF value. From Table II  
one can observe many similar trends appeared in  
the YD2 cases related to moderator material  
volume fraction, LLFP S/A location etc.  
Nevertheless, severe PPF values already appear  
at a low moderator material volume fraction of  
30 %. The largest TR value (5.12) is found the 1  
& 2 layer pair with volume fraction of 10 %,  
while the largest SF value (17.4) is found for the  
case of LLFP S/As loaded in all layers with BaI2  
volume fraction of 70 %. These largest TR and  
SF values of YH2 are higher than the ones of  
YD2, with the penalty of severer PPF values.  
6
PENG HONG LIEM et al.  
One possible solution for decreasing the  
I-129 Capture Reaction Rate  
6x1014  
5x1014  
4x1014  
3x1014  
2x1014  
1x1014  
0
high PPF values is by using a combination of  
YD2 and YH2 moderator materials as shown in  
the last case of Table II. In this particular case  
the moderator material volume fraction is fixed  
to 30 % for all layers but the first layer uses  
YD2 instead of YH2. The TR and SF values  
decrease slightly from 1.46 to 1.37 and 17.4 to  
16.3, respectively, but the PPF can be  
improved from 1.41 to 0.96.  
Layer 1  
Layer 2  
Layer 3  
In order to have a deeper insight of the  
Layer 1  
Layer 2  
Layer 3 Lay. 1 & 2 Lay. 2 & 3 Lay. 1, 2  
& 3  
LLFP Location  
above-mentioned  
results,  
the  
effective  
microscopic cross sections of I-129, neutron  
flux levels and I-129 neutron capture reaction  
rates of LLFP S/A are processed and shown in  
Figs. 5, 6 and 7, respectively. The figures are  
for the case of YD2 moderator material with  
30 % volume fraction (or equivalently BaI2  
volume fraction of 70 %).  
Fig. 7. I-129 neutron capture reaction rates for the  
case of BaI2 volume fraction of 70 % (YD2  
moderator material).  
When LLFP S/As loaded location is  
varied from single layer 1, 2 and 3, the  
effective capture cross section of I-129  
increases slightly (cf. Fig. 5) since the  
neutron spectra become softer, while as  
shown in Fig. 4 the neutron flux levels  
decrease significantly. As a final result, the  
I-129 capture rates (proportional to the TR  
values) decrease. The same trends can be  
observed for the pair of layers 1 & 2 and 2  
& 3.  
I-129 Capture XS  
1.0  
Layer 1  
Layer 2  
Layer 3  
0.8  
0.6  
0.4  
0.2  
0.0  
Layer 1  
Layer 2  
Layer 3 Lay. 1 & 2 Lay. 2 & 3 Lay. 1, 2  
& 3  
LLFP Location  
The power peaking factors (PPF) for  
the two moderator materials are shown in  
Fig. 8. As expected the YH2 moderator  
material shows higher PPF values than the  
YD2. Under the highest moderator volume  
fraction considered in the present work i.e.  
90 % the PPF values are found to be 1.5  
and 2.7 for YD2 and YH2, respectively. The  
softest neutron spectrum amongst all cases  
listed in Tables I and II is shown in Fig. 9,  
namely the case of YH2 moderator material  
Fig. 5. I-129 effective microscopic capture cross  
section for the case of BaI2 volume fraction of 70 %  
(YD2 moderator material).  
Neutron Flux Level  
1.0x1015  
Layer 1  
Layer 2  
8.0x1014  
6.0x1014  
4.0x1014  
2.0x1014  
0.0  
Layer 3  
with volume fraction of 90 %.  
A
Layer 1  
Layer 2  
Layer 3 Lay. 1 & 2 Lay. 2 & 3 Lay. 1, 2  
& 3  
LLFP Location  
pronounced thermal peak can be observed  
below 1 eV which is the reason for the high  
PPF values.  
Fig. 6. Total neutron flux levels for the case of BaI2  
volume fraction of 70 % (YD2 moderator material).  
7
NUCLEAR TRANSMUTATION OF LONG-LIVED FISSION PRODUCT I-129 IN …  
(3.83 and 5.12) are found for a pair of LLFP  
S/A loaded into the first and second layer with  
BaI2 volume fraction of 10 %, while the largest  
SF values (14.0 and 17.4) are found for the  
case of 3 LLFP S/As with BaI2 volume fraction  
of 70 % for YD2 and YH2 moderator material,  
respectively. YD2 moderator material shows  
better PPF values and should be used in a  
3.0  
2.5  
2.0  
1.5  
1.0  
0.5  
0.0  
YH2 Lay. 1, 2, 3  
YH2 Lay. 1, 2  
YH2 Lay. 1  
YD2 Lay. 1, 2, 3  
YD2 Lay. 1, 2  
YD2 Lay. 1  
LLFP S/A loaded in the first layer of the  
blanket region.  
0
20  
40  
60  
80  
100  
BaI2 Volume Fraction (%)  
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  
Fig. 8. The power peaking factors of the fuel pin in  
the S/A adjacent to the LLFP S/A for YD2 and YH2  
moderator materials.  
This study comprises partly the results  
of “Research and development of an  
innovative transmutation system of LLFP by  
fast reactors”, entrusted to the Tokyo  
Institute of Technology by the Ministry of  
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and  
Technology of Japan (MEXT). Tables and  
Figures were carefully prepared by Mrs.  
Suzuko Ikegami.  
BaI 10%, YH 90%  
2
2
0.15  
0.10  
0.05  
0.00  
REFERENCES  
[1]. Chiba S. et al., “Method to Reduce Long-lived  
Fission Products by Nuclear Transmutations  
with Fast Spectrum Reactors,” Sci. Rep., 7,  
13961, 2017.  
10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102  
Energy (MeV)  
Fig. 9. Neutron spectrum of the I-129 LLFP S/A  
loaded in the first layer for the case of BaI2 volume  
fraction of 10 % (YH2 moderator material).  
[2]. International  
Atomic  
Energy  
Agency,  
Evaluation of Actinide Partitioning and  
Transmutation, Technical Reports Series No.  
214, IAEA, Vienna, 1982.  
III. CONCLUDING REMARKS  
The performance of elemental I-129  
(chemical form BaI2) LLFP nuclear  
transmutation in the radial blanket region of  
the Japanese MONJU fast reactor was  
investigated. Several important parameters  
such as the LLFP S/A loading position,  
moderator material type (YD2 or YH2) and its  
volume fraction are taken into account for  
optimizing the transmutation effectiveness  
guided by using two performance indices, i.e.  
the transmutation rate (TR, %/year) and  
support factor (SF). The largest TR values  
[3]. Osaka M. et al., “Research and Development  
of Minor Actinide-Containing Fuel and Target  
in a Future Integrated Closed Cycle System,”  
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology,  
44(3), 309, 2007.  
[4]. Leppänen J. et al. 2015. “The Serpent Monte  
Carlo Code: Status, Development and  
Applications in 2013,” Annals of Nuclear  
Energy, 82, 142, 2015.  
[5]. Shibata K. et al., “JENDL-4.0: A New Library for  
Nuclear Science and Engineering,” Journal of  
Nuclear Science and Technology, 48, 1, 2011.  
8
Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol.9, No. 3 (2019), pp. 09-20  
Calculation Results for Enhancing Ability of I-131  
Radioisotope Production Using Tellurium Dioxide Target  
on the Dalat Nuclear Research Reactor  
Nguyen Kien Cuong, Huynh Ton Nghiem, Le Vinh Vinh, Luong Ba Vien,  
Pham Quang Huy, Tran Quoc Duong, Bui Van Cuong  
Dalat Nuclear Research Institute, Vietnam Atomic Energy Institute (VINATOM)  
(Received 05 November 2019, accepted 25 November 2019)  
Abstract: The paper presents the calculation results in re-design of neutron trap of the Dalat Nuclear  
Research Reactor (DNRR) for I-131 radioisotope production using TeO2 target. The new design  
permits for loading more TeO2 capsules from 9 to 12, 15 and 18 in the neutron trap. The enhancement  
of radioisotope production was implemented by re-arrangement of the neutron trap without changing  
the dimension or geometry of irradiation capsules. By using neutronics computer code as MCNP6, the  
obtained calculation results of I-131 activity in 6 investigated cases showed that the new design by the  
re-arrangement of the neutron trap can be used effectively for radioisotope production with thermal  
neutron flux in average range from 5.3×1012 to 1×1013 n/cm2.s and the total activity of I-131 isotope  
was increased from about 19.2% to 38.8% comparing with the original design using 9 capsules. The  
negative reactivity insertion was from 0.60 βeff to 0.96 βeff when loading capsules that also met the  
safety requirements of operational conditions of the DNRR.  
Keyword: The DNRR, Radioisotope Production, TeO2, I-131, MCNP6 code.  
production needs to be considered to satisfy the  
domestic market [3]. Therefore, the design  
calculation for enhancement of I-131  
radioisotope production was carried out.  
I. INTRODUCTION  
Research reactor is a very useful facility  
for radioisotope production by using neutron to  
irradiate the target under normal operation. The  
most convenience of this method is simple in  
preparation of target capsules and in their  
irradiation at fixed positions inside or outside  
reactor core. I-131 isotope is an important  
radioisotope that can be used for cancer  
diagnostics and treatment and it is also  
produced easily by using research reactor with  
neutron irradiation on TeO2 target [1]. Even the  
DNRR has low power of 500 kWt and average  
thermal neutron flux is smaller than 5.0×1012  
n/cm2.s, radioisotope production is still applied  
as a main purpose to exploit the reactor during  
more than 35 years from 1984 until now [2].  
The demand of I-131 isotope utilization in  
nuclear medicine is increasing so the effective  
utilization of the DNRR for radioisotope  
By modifying the neutron trap  
structure, the activity of I-131 radioisotope  
was increased by loading up to18 target  
capsules but keeping their geometry and  
dimension. In original design, 9 TeO2 capsules  
have been irradiated at neutron trap of the  
reactor core with 150 hours continuously, and  
the average activity of I-131 isotope can be  
reached to 35 Ci in each reactor operation  
cycle. Basically, the method to produce I-131  
isotope with half-life of about 8.05 days can  
be expressed as follows [1]:  
    
   
    
   
 
 
         
       
 
    
   
    
   
 
 
         
  and the half-life of Te-  
131 is only 25 minutes.  
©2019 Vietnam Atomic Energy Society and Vietnam Atomic Energy Institute  
CALCULATION RESULTS FOR ENHANCING ABILITY OF I-131 RADIOISOTOPE PRODUCTION…  
Fig. 1. The micro cross section of Te-130 isotope [4]  
The neutron capture cross section of Te-  
130 isotope (see in Fig. 1) in the range from  
0.01 eV to 1000 eV is quite high compared  
with cross section at higher energy region. The  
linear of Te-130 capture cross section is in  
thermal energy range under 0.625 eV. So the  
main calculation results for the I-131 isotope  
production are in the thermal neutron energy  
group. The average cross section of neutron  
capture reaction of Te-130 is about 67 mili-  
barns in this region.  
The DNRR is a pool type reactor with  
nominal power of 500 kWt and its main  
purposes are radioisotope production,  
neutron activation analysis and training.  
Recently the demand of radioisotope market,  
especially I-131 isotope is increasing so the  
enhancement of I-131 production on the  
DNRR has been considered in calculation by  
using neutronics computer codes as MCNP6  
[5] and ORIGEN2.1 [6]. The detailed  
calculation about the neutron fluxes inside  
TeO2 target and reaction rate as well as  
neutron fluxes on the irradiation capsules  
were done by MCNP6 code.  
I-131 isotope can be chemically  
separated from the TeO2 target after  
irradiation by thermal neutron on research  
reactor. By this method, high specific  
activity of target can be obtained by  
irradiation with high thermal neutron flux.  
Of course, another method can be used on  
the research reactor to produce I-131 as  
fission product by irradiation of the U-235  
HEU or LEU but the facility chain is very  
complicated with solid waste treatment and  
separation of I-131 through fission products  
as well.  
The number of loaded TeO2 capsules in  
the neutron trap after modifying is about 12,  
15 and 18 capsules. The rearrangement of  
neutron trap with beryllium rods around can  
be created more new irradiation channels.  
The disadvantage of this rearrangement is  
mainly in reducing the neutron flux and  
adding more negative reactivity, however  
the loaded mass of TeO2 increases and I-131  
isotope activity increases from about 19.2%  
to 38.8%.  
10  
NGUYEN KIEN CUONG et al.  
II. CALCULATION MODEL AND METHOD  
A. Calculation model  
the total activity of I-131 after 150-hour reactor  
operating continuously approximated 35 Ci.  
Fig. 2 shows the loading positions of 9 TeO2  
capsules at neutron trap.  
Since 2014, the neutron trap of the DNRR  
was modified for loading up to 9 capsules and  
Fig. 2. The irradiation positions of 9 TeO2 capsules at neutron trap of the DNRR.  
The TeO2 target material used for I-  
131 isotope production is in powder with  
99.9% purity and the mass of Te-130  
isotope is about 27% in weight. The TeO2  
target of 16 cm height is covered by  
aluminum container with the dimension of  
2.6 cm in diameter, 1.5 mm in thickness and  
20 cm in height. The total volume of target  
is about 65 cm3 that is equivalent with 200  
to 230 gram of TeO2.  
power days with the configuration of 92 LEU  
fuel assemblies so the power peaking factor is  
smaller than those at the beginning of  
operation cycle, and the fuel cladding  
temperature is lower than those of the fresh  
core [7]. This means that the operational  
conditions of the reactor meet safety  
requirements.  
After modifying the neutron trap, 6  
available positions can be loaded by maximum  
3 TeO2 capsules in each hole. At the present  
work, the loading of 12 capsules with and  
without graphite reflector on the top and  
bottom, and the loading with 18 capsules was  
considered in calculation models. The MCNP6  
calculation models are shown in Fig. 3.  
By removing the whole neutron trap  
with beryllium blocks (about 6 half beryllium  
blocks), the center of the neutron trap was  
replaced by a beryllium rod to avoid the core  
has too high power density. Until now, the  
DNRR was operated about more than 300 full  
Fig. 3. The arrangement of 12 and 18 TeO2 capsules at neutron trap of the DNRR  
11  
CALCULATION RESULTS FOR ENHANCING ABILITY OF I-131 RADIOISOTOPE PRODUCTION…  
By rearrangement of the beryllium rods  
around neutron trap, 2 new positions for  
loading 3 capsules each hole can be created.  
The total 15 capsules can be loaded in the new  
neutron trap including 9 capsules are still in the  
old positions. The calculation model by using  
MCNP6 code is depicted in Fig. 4. The  
rearrangement of the neutron trap satisfies the  
safety condition as well as the thermal neutron  
flux for radioisotope production.  
5-2  
5-1  
5-3  
5-4  
5-5  
Fig. 4. Loaded positions of 15 TeO2 target capsules in the neutron trap after its rearrangement  
with 5 different options.  
In the new design, it is very simple and  
easy for carrying out experiments to test and to  
confirm the calculation results. Under this  
arrangement, the violation in thermal  
hydraulics limitation is avoided as calculation  
results were confirmed in the design of new  
LEU core as the second candidate core for  
reactor conversion from HEU to LEU fuel [7].  
The calculations were carried out for 6  
cases with different loading capsule numbers  
from 9 to 18. The explanation of loading  
scheme for detail calculations is described in  
the Table I. It is convenient that all cases  
studied were used old capsules and only adding  
more capsules at neutron trap after its  
rearrangement.  
Table I. Calculation cases for enhancement of isotope production on the DNRR  
Number of loaded  
capsules  
Detailed explanation  
9
Original neutron trap using 9 capsules currently (Fig. 2) with 3 layers and in  
each layer 3 capsules can be loaded  
12  
NGUYEN KIEN CUONG et al.  
12 – Normal  
12 – Graphite  
All capsules located at the second ring with beryllium rod at center (Fig. 3).  
Optimizing axial direction of thermal neutron flux.  
Top and bottom of all capsules covered by light water reflector.  
As the first new case above but top and bottom of all capsules covered by  
graphite reflector.  
15 – Long  
(5-1, 5-3, 5-4)  
Creating two more irradiation channels next to neutron trap following axial  
direction in the reactor core (Fig. 4). It is an easy way for rearrangement of  
neutron trap with 3 options to select.  
15 – Wide  
(5-2)  
Creating two more irradiation channels next to neutron trap following radial  
direction in the reactor core (Fig. 4). It is also very easy way for rearrangement  
of neutron trap.  
15 – Normal  
(5-5)  
Creating two more irradiation channels next to neutron trap at cell 5-6 and 9-6  
(Fig. 4).  
18  
As the first new case above but each irradiation channel can be loaded with 3  
capsules in axial direction.  
Neutron fluxes have to be normalized to  
get absolute value of neutron flux under  
thermal power of reactor. The absolute neutron  
flux can be obtained as follows [5]:  
B. MCNP code for neutron fluxes and  
reaction rate calculation  
The MCNP6 code was used for neutron  
flux and reaction rate calculation for TeO2  
target in capsules. The calculation models of  
the DNRR together with target capsules were  
described as detail as possible in Fig. 2, Fig. 3  
and Fig. 4. The ENDF/B7.1, JEFF3.3.1  
libraries [8] were used for calculation. The  
kcode option of MCNP6 code was chosen for  
the calculation with positions of control rods  
were set nearly critical status. The standard  
deviation of keff in the calculation was lower  
than 8.0×10-5 with 160 active cycles and 1  
million particles in each calculation cycle. The  
errors of obtained neutron flux as well as  
reaction rates were smaller than 0.3%. The  
burn-up calculations of the DNRR were mainly  
at two points: after 300 full power days and  
120 full power days.  
Pv  
1
(2)  
m   
m  
1.60221013wf keff  
v
where P is power of reactor (MW), is  
the average number of neutrons released per  
fission, wf is effective energy released per fission  
(~ 193.7 MeV/fission to VVR-M2 LEU fuel  
type) and keff is the effective multiplication factor.  
Actually, getting data including neutron  
flux, reaction rates and effective multiplication  
factor from MCTAL file is easier than reading  
from output file of MCNP6 code. Reaction  
rates R are received in tally as:  
Rmnx xn (E)m (E)dE  
(3)  
where Rmnx is reaction rate type x of nuclide  
n in cell m, micro cross section has unit barns.  
Neutron fluxes and reaction rates of Te-  
130 reactions and multiplication factor were  
calculated by using the MCNP6 code and three  
group neutron fluxes in active cell are  
provided by tally F4:  
C. I-131 activity calculation after its  
irradiation and cooling  
The number density of I-131 can be  
calculated by equation [9]:  
(E)dE  
(1)  
m
m
13  
CALCULATION RESULTS FOR ENHANCING ABILITY OF I-131 RADIOISOTOPE PRODUCTION…  
    
    
        
    
    
        
      
   
   
                
+
 
 
   
   
   
    
    
    
  (  
    
    
    
    
  (  
  )  
   
  (  
  )  
   
 )  
         
        (   )                
     
      
   
   
   
   
(    
)(  
   
)
    
    
(4)  
 (  )  (   )  
   
   
    
(9)  
       
   
 
   
The number density of Te-130 can be  
    
    
    
    
                          
   
   
   
   
calculated by  
(5)  
    
          
 
    
   
    
 (   )   
(10)  
We can interfere that  
   
       
   
    
       
   
   
   
With                   Avogadro  
number;  
 
 
   
    
    
    
  (   )  
   
        (   )(      
)
   
   
    
 (   )is mass of Tellurium in grams;  
   
    
    
            
(6)  
   
   
    
 (   ) is Atomic mass of Tellurium  
   
With is micro cross section (barn); is  
neutron flux (n/cm2.s); is decay constant (s-1)  
and N is the number density of isotopes  
(atoms/cm3).  
in grams.  
The activity A by Curie unit of I-131 can  
be determined by formula:  
The equation can be solved by using  
numerical method or direct calculation after  
integrating the equation (6). Then, the number  
density of I-131 can be obtained as follows:  
    
    
    
                   
(11)  
   
   
   
So the activity in each TeO2 target  
capsule can be determined through the  
calculation by applying equations from (4) to  
(11).  
I-131 activity can also be determined by  
using ORIGEN2.1 code with input data  
including irradiation time under specified  
neutron flux, cooling time and substituted  
capture cross section of Tellurium isotopes in  
activation material library. The thermal neutron  
flux and micro cross section of Tellurium  
isotope were estimated by MCNP6 code.  
    
    
    
    
    
    
     
   
    
    
     
   
      
         
     
(    
)(  
   
)
 
    
 (  )        
   
   
(7)  
And tirr and tdecay are irradiation and  
decay time (hour), respectively.  
III. CALCULATION RESULTS AND  
DISCUSSIONS  
In the equation (7), we can separate as  
two parts with build-up process and decay time  
as follows:  
A. Thermal neutron flux  
In the axial direction, the thermal  
neutron flux distribution of 1 cm/node at the  
original neutron trap without loading target  
compares with modified for loading 9 capsules  
(OLD) and the case having 6 irradiation  
(8)  
14  
NGUYEN KIEN CUONG et al.  
channels (NEW). The profiles of thermal  
trap. However in case adding only 2 new  
irradiation channels as in Fig. 4, the reducing  
of thermal neutron flux at neutron trap is not  
much and only under 5%. Fig. 5 depicts the  
profile of thermal neutron trap without loading  
capsules for radioisotope production.  
neutron flux in three cases have different in  
maximum point of 10% and in the average  
between OLD and NEW type. It is a  
disadvantage of thermal neutron flux when  
creating new irradiation channels around neutron  
Fig. 5. Thermal neutron flux distribution at original neutron trap and modified for loading 9 capsules (OLD)  
and new irradiation positions (NEW)  
Basing on the obtained calculation  
results, the best distance in axial direction that  
has the highest thermal neutron flux is from 8  
to 48 cm at bottom to the top direction. The  
height is equivalent to the length of 2 capsules  
with light water or graphite reflector at the top  
and the bottom.  
just of 8.8×1012, 8.3×1012 and 8.0×1012 with  
15, 18 and 12 capsules loaded, respectively.  
The micro cross section in barn unit of Te-  
130 isotope in thermal energy is about  
1.53E-01 barns.  
The thermal neutron flux inside all  
capsules is high enough from 5.3×1012  
n/cm2.s to 1.0×1013 n/cm2.s at top and  
middle position at irradiation channel. The  
detail axial distribution of each node of  
0.78 cm/node inside 3 TeO2 target capsules  
from bottom to the top is depicted in the  
Fig. 7.  
When loading TeO2 capsules at different  
irradiation positions inside the reactor core  
as in Table I, the average thermal neutron  
flux inside TeO2 target capsules is described  
in the Fig. 6. The maximum of average  
thermal neutron flux in the 9 capsules loaded  
is about 1.0×1013 n/cm2.s while in other cases  
15  
CALCULATION RESULTS FOR ENHANCING ABILITY OF I-131 RADIOISOTOPE PRODUCTION…  
1.1E+13  
1.0E+13  
1.0E+13  
9.8E+12  
9.5E+12  
15-Long  
15-Wide  
9-old  
9.3E+12  
9.0E+12  
8.8E+12  
8.5E+12  
8.3E+12  
8.0E+12  
7.8E+12  
7.5E+12  
7.3E+12  
7.0E+12  
6.8E+12  
6.5E+12  
6.3E+12  
6.0E+12  
5.8E+12  
5.5E+12  
5.3E+12  
5.0E+12  
12-Nor  
12-Graph  
18-Nor  
10-Cont  
15-Nor  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  
Number of container  
Fig. 6. The average thermal neutron flux in each capsule of 6 calculated cases  
Fig. 7. Relative thermal neutron flux of 3 capsules at each node in an irradiation channel  
from bottom to the top  
number of capsules is depicted on the Table  
II with the difference of TeO2 mass in the  
capsules. The maximum of the negative  
reactivity insertion depends on the mass of  
loaded targets and it will be increased when  
increasing mass of Te-130.  
B. Negative reactivity and safety  
The negative reactivity insertion when  
loading capsules was also estimated by  
comparing with the core configuration  
without  
capsules.  
Detailed  
negative  
reactivity insertion for different loading  
16  
NGUYEN KIEN CUONG et al.  
Table III. Negative reactivity insertion with different mass of Te-130 from 54 to 62 gram in each  
TeO2 target capsule  
Number of capsule  
Negative reactivity (cents)  
(60.2 – 70.2)  
9
12 normal  
12 with graphite  
15 long  
(69.2 – 79.2)  
(63.4 – 73.4)  
(83.8 – 93.8)  
15 wide  
(81.4 – 91.4)  
18  
(86.5 – 96.5)  
The range of negative reactivity is met  
requirements for the reactor safety in normal  
operation. In thermal hydraulics, fuel cladding  
temperature is a parameter needed to be  
evaluated to assure the nuclear safety. As  
calculation results in the design of new LEU  
cores of the DNRR, the maximum temperature  
of the hottest channels in 2 core configurations  
is lower than permission temperature 1030C.  
So the rearrangement of neutron trap in 5  
investigated cases will be also satisfied the  
limit of fuel cladding temperature after  
operating of 8 years.  
irradiation time from 24 to 150 hours and the  
same target mass of 62 gram Te-130,  
calculation results are shown in Table II and  
Fig. 8. The increasing of neutron flux is  
proportional with I-131 activity in the scale 1  
by 1. So the improvement of thermal neutron  
flux is  
a
way to enhancement for  
radioisotope production. In case of the  
DNRR, the method to increase neutron flux  
is difficult because of its low power and  
design especially using fuel with low power  
density. If upgrading power of the DNRR  
from 0.5 MW to 0.6 or 0.8 MW the expected  
thermal neutron flux can be increased 16 to  
35% respectively. Because the irradiation  
positions in axial direction of 3 capsules in  
each channel have different thermal neutron  
flux, the archived activity of I-131 after 150-  
hour irradiation of current 9 capsules has the  
ratio as 1.00:1.20:1.54 as top, bottom and  
middle positions of target.  
C. Activity of I-131 isotope in 6 investigated  
cases  
The main effects of irradiation for  
radioisotope production include thermal  
neutron flux, mass of target and irradiation  
time or decay time. With different neutron  
flux range from 5.3E+12 to 1.0E+13 n/cm2.s,  
Table II. Calculation results of I-131 activity (Ci) at different thermal neutron flux and the mass of Te-130 is  
about 62 gram in a capsule  
Activity of I-131 (Ci) with different thermal neutron flux (n/cm2.s)  
Irradiation  
F=5.3E+12 F=5.5E+12  
F=6.8E+12  
0.65  
F=8.5E+12  
0.81  
time (hr.)  
F=6.5E+12  
0.62  
F=7.8E+12  
0.75  
F=1.0E+13  
0.96  
24  
48  
0.51  
0.99  
1.42  
1.83  
2.20  
2.54  
0.53  
1.02  
1.48  
1.90  
2.28  
2.63  
1.21  
1.26  
1.45  
1.58  
1.86  
72  
1.75  
1.83  
2.10  
2.28  
2.69  
96  
2.24  
2.34  
2.69  
2.93  
3.45  
120  
144  
2.69  
2.82  
3.23  
3.52  
4.14  
3.11  
3.25  
3.73  
4.07  
4.78  
17  
Tải về để xem bản đầy đủ
pdf 59 trang yennguyen 10560 Free
Bạn đang xem 20 trang mẫu của tài liệu "The journal of Nuclear Science and Technology - Volume 9, Number 3, September 2019", để tải tài liệu gốc về máy hãy click vào nút Download ở trên

File đính kèm:

  • pdfthe_journal_of_nuclear_science_and_technology_volume_9_numbe.pdf