Corpus-based methods in linguistic research

VẤN ĐỀ HÔM NAY  
CORPUS-BASED METHODS  
IN LINGUISTIC RESEARCH  
Nguyen Thi Hong Ha MA *  
Abstract: Corpus-based methods in linguistic research was initiated by Paul  
Baker in 2006 through the publication ‘Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis’  
(London: Continuum). Since then, the method has been applied by many linguists  
in great variety of research, especially in making dictionaries, teaching languages,  
and comparing translations. With a number of advantages, the method enables  
researchers to quantify linguistic patterns, and to come to solid conclusions. Thanks  
to the technology development, user-friendly software has motivated the method to  
move rapidly, promising to bring many useful linguistic applications to our life.  
Key words: corpus, method, research, linguistics, application.  
1. Introduction  
Corpus linguistics is a popular field of  
linguistics involving ‘the analysis of very  
large collections of electronically stored  
texts aided by computer software’ (Paul  
Baker in Litosseliti, 2010: 93). The word  
‘corpus’inLatinmeansbody,soacorpuscan  
be understood a ‘body’ of texts. According  
to Mc Enery and Wilson (1996:1), corpus  
linguistics features a ‘methodology’ rather  
than a traditional branch of linguistics like  
semantics, grmammar, or phonetics.  
Corpuslinguisticswithcharacteristics  
of empirical, inductive forms of analysis  
relies on instances of language in real-life  
use. The aims of corpus linguistics are to  
find out patterns, rules or explore trends  
about the ways people actually use their  
language in everyday life.  
Asfarasweknow,quantitativeresearch  
concentrate on how much or how many  
there is/are of a particular characteristic or  
item of a linguistic aspect. The strong point  
of this method is that it enables researchers  
to compare ralatively large numbers of  
things, people by applying a comparatively  
easy index. Quantative data use statistical  
methods for analysis, that is, particular  
methametics tools allow researchers to  
conduct on numeric data. Corpus-based  
methods are regarded as effective research  
methods in linguistics, and they ‘should  
not be considered as only quantitative, but  
ratherthananapproachwhichcancombine  
both qualitative and quantitative processes’  
(Paul Baker in Litosseliti, 2010: 93).  
This article mentions corpus-based  
methods in details, from basic concepts,  
their applications, to building and  
annotating corpora in linguistic research.  
2. Theoretical Concepts of Corpus  
Linguistics  
2.2. Advantages of Corpus Linguistics  
There are several great advantages  
of corpus-based methods in linguistics  
as follow:  
(i) Corpus-based methods enable  
researchers to restate or refect hypotheses  
about language use;  
1.1. Definition  
Tạp chí  
* Dean of English Faculty B,  
Hanoi University of Business and Technology  
23  
Kinh doanh và Công nghệ  
No 05E/2019  
VẤN ĐỀ HÔM NAY  
3. Types of corpora  
(ii) Corpus-based methods allow  
researchers to bring out new questions  
and theories about language;  
(iii) Corpus-based methods help  
researchers to quantify linguistic patterns,  
reaching more solid conclusions on  
language;  
Corpora in existence are divided  
into three main pairs (Baker, P. 2006  
in Litosseliti, 2010), based on their  
characteristics and aims:  
3.1. General corpora and specialized  
corpora  
A general corpus aims to represent  
a particular language like the British  
National Corpus BNC or The Bank  
of English BoE., which is extremely  
large and takes a long time to build and  
annotate. More importantly, they are  
very useful resources for a wide range  
of research purposes. They play the role  
of ‘benchmark’ about a typical language  
in comparison with a specilized corpus.  
Meanwile, a specialized corpus is much  
smaller and has more limited sets of  
texts in restrictions on time, genre or  
place/language variety. For instance, a  
specialized corpus of just newspapers  
published in October, 2019 in Vietnam.  
Speacilized corpora are generally easier  
to collect and for specific research  
questions.  
3.2. Written corpora and spoken corpora  
Written corpora contain computer-  
mediated texts such as e-mails, text  
messages or websites or mixture of all  
three while spoken corpora are usually  
smaller due to complexities surrounding,  
gathering and transcribing data. Written  
corpora with the access to the Internet are  
easier to build because most of the texts  
are already electronically coded. This type  
of corpora is expected to be increasingly  
popular when societies more frequently  
use electronic forms of communication.  
3.3. Multilingual corpora and  
Parallel Corpora  
(iv) Corpus-based methods with  
large corpora lead researchers to obvious  
evidence of rare or unusual instances  
of language, and confirmation on very  
common phenomena of language.  
2.3. Research questions of corpus-  
based methods  
The overarching questions of corpus-  
based methods is ‘how do people really use  
language’, around which many research  
questions related to different fields in  
linguistics are raised. For example, in  
the field of language teaching it can be  
seen: ‘Is the language used in textbooks  
actually reflected the language that people  
encounter in everyday life?’ (Mindt, 1996);  
or in study on language genres: ‘Has  
writeen language become more informal  
over recent years?’(Kennedy, 1998).  
Moreover, the comparative trend also  
appears in research questions within studies  
on corpus-based linguistics, such as ‘How  
does the use of linguistic feature X differ in  
usage between language varieties A and B  
intermsoffrequencyand/ortypicalusage?’  
or ‘What associations are triggered by the  
use of linguistic item X, based on its typical  
uses?’ Not only to discover similarities  
between the features of languages, but also  
do corpus-based methods help find out  
differences, in spite of small difference,  
or even no difference which is worth  
researching. In addition, corpus linguistic  
research approaches language patterns that  
people are unaware of, but they may still  
strongly influence users.  
Thecomparisonofdifferentlanguages  
has emerged as a growing area of corpus  
Tạp chí  
Kinh doanh và Công nghệ  
24  
No 05E/2019  
VẤN ĐỀ HÔM NAY  
linguistics. This area is useful in fields of use a corpus and the others used a corpus.  
language teaching, language testing, and These are the findings of the study  
translation. A multilingual corpus usually (Hunston, 2002: 97):  
involves equal amounts of texts from  
- The 1987 Longman Dictionary of  
a number of differents languages in the ContemporaryEnglish(withoutacorpus):  
same genre. There is no need to translate 20 senses;  
directlyfromonelanguageintoanotherfor  
- The 1995 Longman Dictionary  
such texts. Meanwhile, a parallel corpus (with a corpus): over 40 senses;  
is a special type of miltilingual corpus, in  
- The 1995 COBUILD Dictionary  
which texts are exact equivalents of each (with a corpus): over 30 senses.  
other. Parallel corpus are often carefully  
Obviously, corpus-base methods  
designed, sentence-aligned, that means showtheiradvantagesofenhancingsenses  
tags are added to the corpus to identify of meaning of words in dictionaries,  
which sentences are translations of each reflecting the reality of diversely using  
other. With the aid of the right software, language in everyday life.  
researchers view translations of sentecnes  
side by side, and recognise the differences  
between translations and the original.  
3.4. Learner Corpora  
4.2. Aplication in translation studies  
Corpus-base methods, especially  
with the types of multilingual and  
parallel corpora show their strengths in  
A learner corpus is produced by comparative transaltion and interpreting  
learners of that language, that is very studies. When conducting research on  
useful for teachers to realize common punctuation in Hans Christian Andersen’s  
errors at different stages of development, stories and in their translations into  
and indicate over- and underuses of English, Malmkjer (1997) concludes that  
vocabulary or grammar of learners in in translations, punctuation tends to be  
comparison with an equivalent corpus of strenghtened, with commas aften being  
native speakers. The Longman Learner replaced with semicolons or full stops,  
Corpus and the International Corpus of and semicolons being transferred to full  
LearnerEnglishbothreceivecontributions stops, too. This leads to long, complex  
from a great variety of learners all over sentences being divided into shorter and  
the world, helping researchers find out the simpler clauses in translations to reduce  
extent to which a student’s first language the complexity of sentence structures in  
is likely to influence the way they acquire the original.  
English.  
4. Applications of corpus-based reveals that translators usually make  
methods in linguistics optional cohesive markers explicit in the  
In another study, Mauranen (2000)  
4.1. Application in linguistic description translations, even though they are not  
Corpus-based methods can aid available in the original text. This results  
researchers in making dictionary with in a tendency to spell things out rather  
real-life examples of words in use. than make them implicit.  
Hunston (2002) researches the senses of  
the verb ‘KNOW’ shown in examples in  
4.3. Application in forensic linguistics  
Coulthard (1993) carries out his study  
three dictionaries, one of which did not on witness statements used as evidence in  
Tạp chí  
Kinh doanh và Công nghệ  
25  
No 05E/2019  
VẤN ĐỀ HÔM NAY  
the trial of Derk Bentley (who was excuted verbs, which were less frequent in use in  
in Britian in 1953 for his involvement the corpus. Such studies are very useful for  
in a policeman’s death). He compares writing textbooks and designing teaching  
the frequencies of words in Bentley’s syllabus in language teaching.  
statements with that in general written and  
spokenEnglish,andthatofotherpolicemen  
4.6. Application in stylistics  
Corpus methods of analysis have  
and witnesses. He notes that Bentley had been used in stylistics in order to enhance  
a higher frequency of using word ‘then’ systematicity and decrease subjectivity.  
than others. However, this word is a very For example, Malhberg (2009) examines  
typical feature of the police. This, together stylistics in writing literary works by  
with other corpus-based eveidence, the Charles Dickens and states that the writer  
researcher argues that Bentley aged 11 often mentions the ways characters use  
had not made his own statement, but it had household objects as a way of drawing  
been written for him.  
readers’ attention to the characters’  
4.4.ApplicationinCriticalDiscourse emotions. Indicating a number of  
Analysis CDA  
examples in the works related to objects  
In the area of CDA, Baker (2006) like a watering-pot or a knife and fork,  
demonstrates how corpus-based methods the researcher through her corpus-based  
can be used to express the ‘incremental analysis concludes that in Dickens’novels  
effect of discourse’. He states that an these objects are consistently used to  
association between two words, occuring emphasize characters’ emotional states.  
many times in naturally occurring  
language is much better evidence for an building corpora  
underlying hegemonic discourse made Difference  
5. Corpus-based research tools and  
across  
space/genres  
explicit through the word combination (variation) and over time (change) is the  
than a single case. Furthermore, Mautner most commonly applied in corpus- based  
(2007) examines a corpus from a wide research. According to Baker, among them  
range of language sources to see how frequencydataare‘indicatorofmarkedness’  
the elderly construct their discourse. The (Baker 2010: p.125); wordlists are the most  
researcher recognizes that their discourse basic ‘points of entry’(Baker 2010: p.133)  
is expressed as ill-health victims who to analyse; keywords are ‘somewhat  
are in need of care more often than as more sophisticated’ (Baker 2010: p.134)  
empowered or independent citizens.  
means of research and concordances with  
4.5. Application in language teaching associated information are involved in  
Corpora can also help language collocates and clusters.  
teaching be more effective. Mindt (1996)  
studies a corpus of spoken English and  
The most frequently used data include:  
(i) Corpus, text and sentence (average  
realized that native speakers use the model word length);  
verb ‘will’most frequently for referring to  
(ii) Standardized type/ token ration  
future time. Yet, in German textbooks used (STTR) and standard deviation (SD);  
for teaching English, ‘will’was introduced  
to students in the middle of the second year  
(iii) Significance (p-value).  
Theoretically, any text and collection  
when they had already learnt other modal oftextsareconsideredtobeacorpusandthe  
Tạp chí  
Kinh doanh và Công nghệ  
26  
No 05E/2019  
VẤN ĐỀ HÔM NAY  
analysis can be conducted on the corpus of to make sure that the corpus must be as a  
veryshorttexts.AccordingtoMcEneryand whole. Perhaps, it is not necessary to take  
Wilson (1996), a corpus usually contains the whole text, but parts of it if they are  
a sample ‘maximally representative of too long novels. Equal-sized samples from  
the variety under examination’ is ‘of a texts also need to be considered carefully to  
finte size’, exists in ‘machine readable’ assure the balance. For instance, different  
and ‘constitutes a standard reference for parts (beginnings, middles, ends) of texts  
the language variety which it represents’ are equally sampled for the corpus. If texts  
(McEnery and Wilson, 1996: 22-23). It is are quite short and from one writer, the  
clear that a corpus must be large enough whole texts might be included rather than  
to show some feature about frequencies of different sections.  
linguistic phenomena, helping researchers  
to discover the common as well as unusual the assistance of analysis software doing  
things in language. counting, sorting and presenting language  
Corpora are usually applied with  
Baker in Litosseliti (2010: p.95) characteristics. The current software such  
suggests three criteria for identifying the as WordSmith Tools, Xaira, Wmatrix, and  
size of a corpus: aspects of language, AntConc can be employed in conjuction  
type of language, and pratical reasons. with a range of corpora. First, each text  
Kennedy (1998: 68) states that ‘a corpus within a corpus is usually saved on a  
of 100,000 words will usually big enough separate file containing a ‘header’ which  
for the sudy of prosody’, and an analysis has information about its author, date of  
of verb-form morphology will need half publication,genre,etc.Itallowsresearchers  
a million words. Meanwhile, according to concentrate on specific types of texts  
to Biber (1993) confirms that a million or to compare different types. Second, a  
words will be enough for a study on corpus is annotated or tagged with further  
grammar. Also, the more various the information for more complex calculations  
language is, the larger the corpus requires. carried out on them. Sometimes, standard  
The British National Corpus involving a generalized mark-up language (SGML)  
very wide range of written and spoken where tags are presented in codes  
language genres and as a standard (elements) inside matching angle brackets  
reference for British English, has the size (< >) is applied. Finally, certain features  
of 100 million words while a corpus of of the language variety are represented  
weather forecast with restricted language with other codes (entities) starting with an  
just needs a much more smaller size. The ampersand character (&) and ending in a  
practical conditions affecting the building semi-colon.  
a corpus could be the avalability of texts,  
the amount of money and time spent on although tagging can be automatically  
the study and permission from authors. done by computer as tagging software  
Hand-checking is often required  
The key theoretical concepts in corpus is not always 100% accurate. Computer  
linguistic include sampling, balcance and programs usually work best on texts having  
representativeness. A corpus must be grammatically predictable sentences and  
representative of a particular language relatively familiar words. Apart from  
variety, sothetextsneedchoosingcarefully checking, only human beings can interpret  
Tạp chí  
Kinh doanh và Công nghệ  
27  
No 05E/2019  
VẤN ĐỀ HÔM NAY  
the results of calculations from computer, to build a corpus, a continuing need  
no computer software can cover this work. to update balanced reference corpora,  
6. Conclusion  
researcher’s ability to use computer  
In summary, corpus-based methods fluently, identifying certain type of  
are regared as potential to produce language patterns, it is worth applying  
interesting findings about language, to linguistic studies where comparisons  
but as with many other methods, it is must be done. The advantage of the  
researchers’ task to provide explantion corpus-based methods lies in employing  
for the findings. Corpus-based methods fast and accurate techniques to discover  
cannot cover all fields in linguistics, so it patterns that human reserarchers would  
could be combined with other methods to not recognize. Corpus analysis uses large  
maximize strengths and avoid limitations. amount of natural data, so a high degree  
Although it contains its weak points such of reliability and validity of linguistic  
as being time and money-consuming research is usually achieved.  
References  
1. Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.  
2. Baker, P. (2010). Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh  
Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.  
3. Biber, D. (1993). ‘Representativess in corpus design’ Literary and linguistics  
Computing 8,4: 243-57.  
4.Coulthard,M.(1993).‘Onbeginningthestudyofforensictexts:corpusconcordance  
collocation’. In M.Hoey (ed.). Data, Description, Discourse. London: Harper Collins.  
5. Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge  
University Press.  
6. Kennedy, G. (1998), An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. London: Longman.  
7. Litosseliti, L. (2010). Research Methods in Linguistics. Continuum.  
8. Malhberg, M. (2009). ‘Corpus stylistics and the Pickwickian watering-pot’ in  
Baker (ed.). Contemporary Approaches to Corpus Linguistics. London: Continuum.  
9. Malmkjer, K. (1997). ‘Punctuation in Hans Christian Andersen’s stories and  
in their translations into English’, in F.Poyatos (ed.). Nonverbal Communication and  
Translation. New Perspectives and Challenges in Literature, Interpretation and the  
Media. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.  
10. Mauranen, A. (2000). ‘Strange strings in translated language: a study on  
corpora’, in M. Olohan (ed.). Intercultural Faultlines. Research Models in Translation  
Studies 1: Textual and Cognitive Aspects. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.  
11. Mautner, G. (2007). ‘Mining large corpora for social information: the case of  
elderly’, Language in Society, 36 (1), 51-72.  
12. Mindt, D. (1996). ‘English corpus linguistics and the foreign language teaching  
syllabus’, in J. Thomas and M. Shorty (eds), Using Corpora for Language Research.  
London: Longman, 232-247.  
13. Mc Enery and Wilson (1996). Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh  
University Press.  
Tạp chí  
Kinh doanh và Công nghệ  
28  
No 05E/2019  
VẤN ĐỀ HÔM NAY  
PHƯƠNG PHÁP DỰA VÀO KHỐI LIỆU TRONG NGHIÊN CỨU NGÔN NGỮ  
ThS. Nguyễn Thị Hồng Hà *  
Phương pháp dựa vào khối liệu trong phong phú: từ việc mô tả ngôn ngữ trong  
nghiên cứu ngôn ngữ được học giả Paul làm từ điển, đến hỗ trợ dạy tiếng, ngôn  
Baker khởi xướng vào năm 2006 qua ấn ngữ pháp lý, phong cách học, đến nghiên  
bản ‘Sử dụng Khối liệu trong Phân tích cứu so sánh trong dịch thuật,…  
Diễn ngôn’ (Nxb London: Comtinuum).  
Đây là một phương pháp mới trong  
Kể từ đó, phương pháp này được nhiều nghiên cứu ngôn ngữ ở Việt Nam, nên tác  
nhà ngôn ngữ học áp dụng trong các giả muốn giới thiệu nó đến bạn đọc. Cùng  
nghiên cứu của mình, đặc biệt trong việc với sự phát triển của công nghệ, các phần  
biên soạn từ điển, dạy ngoại ngữ, và so mềm hỗ trợ tính toán hiện đại đã làm cho  
sánh dịch thuật.  
phương pháp này ngày càng phát triển  
Phương pháp này có nhiều lợi thế, mạnh, mang lại nhiều ứng dụng thiết thực  
giúp nhà nghiên cứu định lượng hóa các của ngôn ngữ cho đời sống đương đại.  
mẫu ngôn ngữ, từ đó đi đến những kết luận  
Từ khóa: Phương pháp, nghiên cứu,  
đầy thuyết phục. Ứng dụng của phương khối liệu, ngôn ngữ học, ứng dụng.  
pháp này trong nghiên cứu ngôn ngữ rất  
Ngày nhận bài: 15/10/2019  
Tạp chí  
* Chủ nhiệm Khoa Tiếng Anh B,  
Trường ĐH KD&CN Hà Nội  
29  
Kinh doanh và Công nghệ  
No 05E/2019  
pdf 7 trang yennguyen 19720 Free
Bạn đang xem tài liệu "Corpus-based methods in linguistic research", để tải tài liệu gốc về máy hãy click vào nút Download ở trên

File đính kèm:

  • pdfcorpus_based_methods_in_linguistic_research.pdf