Bubble behavior in liquid-gas two-phase flow behind a cross-shaped obstacle in a vertical circular duct

Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol.9, No. 4 (2019), pp. 01-08  
Bubble behavior in liquid-gas two-phase flow behind  
a cross-shaped obstacle in a vertical circular duct  
K. Takase*, G. Kawasaki, K. Ueta  
*Department of Nuclear System Safety Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Japan  
E-mail: [email protected]agaokaut.ac.jp  
(Received 07 November 2019, accepted 26 December 2019)  
Abstract: Grid spacers installed in subchannels of fuel assemblies for nuclear reactors can promote  
heat transfer. However, the fluid velocity and bubble behavior are greatly affected as the cross-  
sectional area of the flow passage changes. Therefore, the void fraction distribution behind the  
obstacle that simulates the grid spacer shape simply was measured by using a wire mesh sensor  
(WMS) system. Moreover, a two-phase flow analysis was performed to investigate the effect of the  
obstacle on the bubble behavior in a vertical duct.  
Keywords: Bubbler, Two-phase flow, Obstacle, Vertical duct, WMS, Experiment, Analysis.  
simulated spacer was visually observed and  
the void fraction and interfacial velocity  
distributions just behind the simulated  
spacer was measured.  
I. INTRODUCTION  
Clarifying two-phase characteristics  
in a nuclear reactor core is important in  
particular to enhance the thermo-fluid safety  
of nuclear reactors. Moreover, correct data  
on bubbly flow in subchannels with spacers  
are needed in order to verify two-phase flow  
models in conventional nuclear safety  
analysis codes and validate predicted data  
by current CFD codes like a direct two-  
phase flow analysis code (Douce, et al.,  
2010). Spacers installed in subchannels of  
fuel assemblies have the role of keeping the  
interval between adjacent fuel rods constant.  
Similarly, in case of PWR the spacer has  
also the role as the turbulence promoter.  
When the transient event occurs in a nuclear  
reactor, two-phase flow is generated by  
boiling of water due to heating of fuel rods.  
Therefore, it is important to confirm the  
bubbly flow behavior around the spacer.  
The purpose of this study is to make the  
effect of the spacer affecting the bubbly  
flow clear and obtain code validation data.  
So bubble dynamics around the simply  
II. EXPERIMENTAL METHOD  
1. Experimental Apparatus  
The experimental apparatus mainly  
consists of  
a
measuring section and  
water/air supply lines and is shown in Fig.  
1. The measuring section includes a vertical  
flow channel with a diameter of 58 mm  
made of an acrylic resin, inlet and outlet  
plenums, and an air injection nozzle with  
120 injection holes with a diameter of 0.6  
mm. Water flows through the inlet plenum  
into the flow channel and goes up through  
the measuring section to the outlet plenum.  
Air is supplied from the air injection nozzle  
into the flow channel. As a result, water is  
mixed with air and then a water-air two-  
phase flow is formed as can be seen in Fig.  
2. Bubbly flow conditions are determined  
by both flow rates of water and air.  
©2019 Vietnam Atomic Energy Society and Vietnam Atomic Energy Institute  
BUBBLE BEHAVIOR IN LIQUID-GAS TWO-PHASE FLOW BEHIND A CROSS-SHAPED…  
f58 mm  
Wire  
mesh  
Sensor  
Cross-  
shaped  
obstacle  
High  
speed  
Camera  
Air nozzle  
Fig. 1. Outline of an experimental apparatus  
Fig. 2. Observed rising bubbles in a flow channel  
temperatures of water and air are measured at  
the water/air supply piping lines.  
2. Wire-Mesh Sensor System  
The void fraction distribution at the  
horizontal cross- section in the flow channel is  
measured with a wire-mesh sensor (WMS)  
system (Prasser et al., 1998; 2000; 2001).  
Complicated behavior of an interface between  
water and air of each bubble is visually  
observed with a high speed camera (HSC).  
Moreover, two-phase pressure loss is measured  
with seven differential pressure transducers  
installed in the arbitrary locations in the  
vertical direction of the flow channel. In  
addition, both flow rates, pressures and  
The WMS can obtain the void fraction  
distribution in a cross-section of the flow channel  
by measuring the electric current from the  
transmitter-side wire layer through the fluid to the  
receiver-side wire layer. Both wire layers consist  
of nine wires respectively and are installed in the  
flow channel with the distance of 3 mm in the  
flow direction. The wire diameter is 0.3 mm.  
Appearance and measuring wires of the WMS  
are shown in Fig. 3. A mearing method with  
the WMS is as follows.  
Layout of each wire of transmitter and  
Clipped layout of  
each wire  
receiver in the vertical direction  
(Dimension: mm)  
Appearance of a wire-mesh sensor  
Fig. 3. Appearance and layout of a wire-mesh sensor in a circular flow channel  
2
K. TAKASE et al.  
1)Current is given to the transmitter-side  
wire layer;  
Moreover,  
the  
cross-correlation  
coefficient used to obtain the interfacial  
velocity is obtained from the relationship  
between both data measured by a couple of  
the WMS layers and is expressed by the  
following equation.  
2) The current flows from the transmitter-  
side wire layer through the fluid to the  
receiver-side wire layer;  
3)The voltage is measured at the location  
where each wire intersects; and,  
n
x x  
y
y  
  
t
t  
t1  
4)Void fraction between both wires  
is obtained.  
(3)  
cor()   
n
2
2
x x  
y
y  
   
t
t  
t1  
The following equation is used for  
the conversion from the voltage to the  
void fraction.  
Here, x and y represent time series void  
fraction data measured with the WMS  
installed upstream in the flow direction and  
the WMS installed downward. The n shows  
the number of comparison data. The cross-  
correlation coefficient, cor() has the value  
from -1 to 1, and it shows 1 when both data of  
x and y have the positive correlation, -1 when  
those are the negative correlation, and 0 when  
those have no correlation.  
UL Ui, j  
(1)  
i, j  
UL UG  
Here, is the local void fraction, (i, j)  
is the position where two wires intersect in  
the cross-section of the flow channel, U [V]  
is the voltage measured by the WMS at two-  
phase flow condition, Each of UL [V] and  
UG [V] is the voltage measured by the WMS  
at the single-phase flow condition of liquid  
or gas.  
On the other hand, gas-liquid interface  
velocity is determined using the time-series  
void fraction data measured by a couple of the  
WMS layers which are installed upstream and  
downstream of the flow channel. Two void  
fraction data by both WMS layers are  
compared. In Fig 4, time difference, , in case  
that the cross-correlation coefficient between  
both void fraction data shows the highest  
match is identified. Finally, the gas-liquid  
interface velocity, ub, is calculated by Eq. (2)  
using S and . Here, S is the distance between  
both receiver-side wire layers.  
S
Fig. 4. Example of time variation of void fraction  
ub   
(2)  
data at the different vertical positions  
3
BUBBLE BEHAVIOR IN LIQUID-GAS TWO-PHASE FLOW BEHIND A CROSS-SHAPED…  
Table II. Experimental Conditions of  
3. Experimental Conditions  
The present experiments  
Superfacial Velocity of Gas in Mixture, JG  
were  
performed under the conditions of room  
temperature, atmospheric pressure and non-  
heated isothermal flow. Working fluids are  
water and air. Superficial velocities of water  
and air, JL and JG, are set to be 0.13-1.0 m/s  
for JL, and 0.025-0.4 m/s for JG. Experimental  
conditions of JL and JG are shown in Table I  
and Table II.  
Case  
JL1  
JL2  
JL3  
JL4  
JL (m/s)  
0.13  
0.25  
0.5  
1.0  
In order to investigate the influence of  
an obstacle in the flow channel to the void  
fraction distribution, the obstacle with the  
dimensions of the thickness 5 mm, the height  
50 mm and the horizontal distance 58 mm as  
shown in Fig. 5 was installed in the position  
of 20 or 100 mm upstream from the WMS.  
The shape of the obstacle simply simulates  
that of the grid spacer and shows a cross-  
shape, but the dimensions are different.  
Table I. Experimental Conditions of Superfacial  
Velocity of Water in Mixture, JL  
Case  
JG1  
JG2  
JG3  
JG4  
JG (m/s)  
0.025  
0.05  
0.1  
0.2  
Fuel rod  
Grid spacer  
Dimensions of a cross-  
shaped obstacle  
Layout of fuel rods  
with a grid spacer  
Fig. 5. Appearance of a cross-shaped obstacle which simulates the shape of the grid spacer simply  
small bubbles are distributed around the  
wall. On the other hand, the force which  
includes the large lift force, etc. generates  
to the center region of the flow channel in  
case of the large bubbles. As a result, many  
large bubbles are distributed to the center  
region.  
III. RERULTS AND DISCUSSION.  
The time-averaged void fraction  
distribution in the radial direction in the  
flow channel is indicated in Fig. 6. Here, in  
case of Fig. 6 (a) JL is L2 and in case of  
Fig. 6 (b) JL is L4. When JG is low, the void  
fraction distribution shows the wall-peak  
distribution. On the other hand, when JG is  
high, it becomes the core-peak distribution.  
The force which includes the lift force, etc.  
generates towards the wall direction in case  
of the small bubbles. Therefore, many  
Figure 7 is the bubble behavior observed  
with HSC. Here, the superficial velocity  
condition in Fig. 7 (a) are L3 and G1. Similarly,  
that in Fig. 7 (b) is L3 and G4. In case of Fig. 7  
(a) small bubbles are observed. Meanwhile,  
4
K. TAKASE et al.  
since coalescence of small bubbles is promoted  
slug flow with a shape of the bullet is observed  
in case of Fig. 7 (b).  
with increasing the superficial gas velocity, the  
0.5  
0.5  
G1  
G2  
G3  
G4  
G5  
G1  
G2  
G3  
G4  
0.4  
0.3  
0.2  
0.1  
0
0.4  
0.3  
0.2  
0.1  
0
-20  
-10  
0
10  
20  
-20  
-10  
0
10  
20  
Radial position [mm]  
Radial position [mm]  
(a) In case of JL=JL2  
(b) In case of JL=JL4  
Fig. 6. Radial void fraction distributions obtained by the conditions of JL2 and JL4  
(b) In cases of JL3 and JG4  
Fig. 7. Observed bubble behavior at JL3, JG1 and JG4  
(a) In cases of JL3 and JG1  
Void fraction distributions in the flow  
channel with and without the obstacle when  
JL=L3 and JG=G1 are indicated in Fig. 8.  
Here, since measuring data in the circular  
flow channel are shown as a square figure,  
four comers in the square figure are the  
outside of the measuring area. The void  
fraction is shown with the color contour.  
Here, blue is 0, red is 0.2 and other colors  
show the value between 0 and 0.2. The void  
fraction distribution of Fig. 8 (a) which is the  
no obstacle case shows the wall peak because  
Gris the small bubble (i.e., bubbly flow)  
condition. On the other hand, Fig. 8 (b) and  
(c) are the results at each position of 20 or  
100 mm behind the obstacle. The void  
fraction becomes high just behind the  
obstacle at Fig. 8 (b). The reason for this is  
that the bubbles separated at the leading edge  
of the obstacle coalesce just behind the  
obstacle. Furthermore, the void fraction  
becomes uniform at Fig. 8 (c). This is  
because the distance of 100 mm is long and  
the distribution is flattened.  
5
BUBBLE BEHAVIOR IN LIQUID-GAS TWO-PHASE FLOW BEHIND A CROSS-SHAPED…  
Fig. 8. Void fraction distributions at JL3 and JG1  
Fig. 9. Void fraction distributions at JL3 and JG5  
(a) No obstacle  
(b) 20 mm behind  
(c) 100 mm behind  
Fig.10. Three-dimensional void fraction distributions when JL=JL3 and JG=JG5  
Void fraction distributions in the flow  
channel with and without the obstacle when  
JL=L3 and JG=G5 are indicated in Fig. 9.  
Here, blue is 0, red is 0.4 and other colors  
6
K. TAKASE et al.  
show the value between 0 and 0.4. The void  
from the channel center to the side wall; r0 and  
r are the radius and radial distance from the  
center of the circular flow channel.  
fraction distribution of Fig. 9 (a) which is the  
no obstacle case shows the core peak because  
G5 is the large bubble (i.e., slug flow)  
condition. Figures 9 (b) and (c) are the results  
at the positions of 20 and 100 mm behind the  
obstacle. In Fig. 9 (b) the void fraction  
becomes low just behind the obstacle and high  
at the region except for the area just behind  
that. This is because large bubbles are divided  
by the obstacle. In Fig. 9 (c) the void fraction  
becomes high at the core region because the  
divided bubbles coalesce again.  
The flow velocity was JL=L3 and JG was  
changed to three kinds of G1, G3 and G5. The  
open symbol shows the result in the case of no  
obstacle. When the flow rate is low, the void  
fraction distribution in the horizontal cross  
section of the flow channel becomes almost  
uniform, and shows the trend of the core peak as  
the flow rate increases. On the other hand, the  
solid symbol shows a case where there is an  
obstacle, and since the large bubble is divided as  
the flow rate increases, a high void fraction is  
seen near the wall of the flow channel.  
Figure 10 shows the results of three-  
dimensional void fraction distribution in the  
case of such large bubbles. Here, Fig. 10 (a) is  
the result when there is no obstacle. Figure 10  
(b) and (c) are the results at the positions of 20  
and 100 mm behind the obstacle, respectively.  
Here, Fig. 10 (a) is found to be the slug flow.  
Also, Fig. 10 (b) shows that large bubbles are  
divided into four. In Fig. 10 (c), the appearance  
of becoming large bubbles is seen.  
Velocity distributions of the bubble  
interface in the flow channel with and without  
the obstacle when and JG=G5 arc indicated in  
Fiq.12. Here, blue is 0 m/s, red is 1 m/s and  
other colors show the velocity between 0 and  
1 m/s. The velocity distribution of Fig.12 (a)  
which is the no obstacle case shows the core  
peak because G5 is the slug flow condition.  
Fig.12 (b) and (c) arc the results at each  
position of 20 or 100 mm behind the obstacle.  
In Fig.12 (b) the velocity distribution of the  
bubble interface shows four peaks in the region  
where no obstacle exists. Moreover, the  
Figure 11 shows the void fraction  
distributions in the radial direction of the flow  
channel. Here, the vertical axis represents the  
local void fraction and the horizontal axis  
represents the dimensionless radial distance  
Without an obstacle:  
JG=JG1  
JG=JG3  
JG=JG5  
With an obstacle:  
JG=JG1  
JG=JG3  
JG=JG5  
Fig. 11. Radial void fraction distributions against different JG at  
the position of 20 mm behind the obstacle when JL=JL3  
7
BUBBLE BEHAVIOR IN LIQUID-GAS TWO-PHASE FLOW BEHIND A CROSS-SHAPED…  
velocity distribution of the bubble interface  
becomes high in the core region as well as the  
tendency of the void fraction distribution, as  
can be seen in Fig. 12 (c).  
Fig. 12. Gas-liquid interface velocity distributions in the flow channel  
with and without the obstacle when JL=JL3 and JG=JG5  
IV. CONCLUSIONS  
5) The gas-liquid interface velocity can  
be predicted from the distribution of the void  
fraction by using the equation of the cross-  
correlation coefficient.  
Bubbly flow behavior, void fraction  
distribution and interfacial velocity distribution  
around the simulated spacer installed in the  
flow channel were investigated experimentally  
and at non-heated and isothermal water-air  
two-phase flow condition. The results of the  
present study arc summarized as follows:  
REFERENCES  
[1]. Prasser, H. M., Böttger, A. and Zschau, J., “A  
New Electrode-Mesh Tomograph for Gas-  
Liquid Flows,” Flow Measurement and  
Instrumentation, 9, 1998.  
1) When JG is low, the void fraction  
distribution in the flow channel without the  
obstacle  
becomes  
the  
wall-  
peak  
[2]. H. M. Prasser, H. M., Krepper E. and Lucas,  
D., “Fast Wire-Mesh Sensors for Gas-Liquid  
Flows and Decomposition of Gas Fraction  
Profiles According to Bubble Size Classes”,  
Second Japanese-European Two-Phase Flow  
Group Meeting, Tsukuba, Japan, September,  
25-29, 2000.  
distribution. When JG is high, it becomes  
the core-peak distribution;  
2) When JG is low, the void fraction  
becomes high just behind the obstacle. The  
reason is that the bubbles separated at the  
leading edge of the obstacle coalesce just  
behind the obstacle;  
[3]. Prasser, H. M., Scholz, D., and Zippe, C.,  
2001, “Bubble Size Measurement Using Wire-  
Mesh Sensors”, Flow Measurement and  
Instrumentation, 12, 4, 2001.  
3) When JG is high, the void fraction  
becomes low just behind the obstacle and high  
at the region except for the area just behind  
that. This is because large bubbles are divided  
by the obstacle;  
[4]. Douce1, A., Mimouni1, A.., Guingo1, M.,  
Morel2, M., J. Laviéville1, J. and Baudry1, C.,  
“Validation of Neptune CFD 1.0.8 for  
Adiabatic Bubbly Flow and Boiling Flow”,  
CFD4NRS-3, September, 14-16, Washington  
DC, USA, 2010.  
4) Behind the obstacle, the distribution  
of the void fraction at the channel cross section  
is flattened as the distance from the obstacle  
increases; and,  
8
pdf 8 trang yennguyen 78520 Free
Bạn đang xem tài liệu "Bubble behavior in liquid-gas two-phase flow behind a cross-shaped obstacle in a vertical circular duct", để tải tài liệu gốc về máy hãy click vào nút Download ở trên

File đính kèm:

  • pdfbubble_behavior_in_liquid_gas_two_phase_flow_behind_a_cross.pdf