Neutron spectrum unfolding using various computer codes: A comparison

Vật lý  
NEUTRON SPECTRUM UNFOLDING  
USING VARIOUS COMPUTER CODES: A COMPARISON  
Nguyen Ngoc Quynh 1, Pham Bao Ngoc 1, Tran Thanh Ha 1, Ho Quang Tuan1,  
Bui Duc Ky1, Dang Thi My Linh1, Dang Quoc Soai2,  
Nguyen Huu Quyet1, Pham Xuan Linh3, Le Ngoc Thiem1*  
Abstract: Dosimetric quantities at various distances from a 30 cm diameter  
polyethylene sphere moderated 241Am-Be source were investigated using the Bonner  
sphere spectrometer system. The different international commercial unfolding codes were  
applied to unfold the neutron spectrum, and their shapes were compared to each other.  
Additionally, the integrated neutron fluence rates overall spectrum and fractional neutron  
fluence rates were deduced and compared between the results obtained from different  
unfolding codes. As an important quantity applying in radiation safety assessment, the  
neutron ambient dose equivalent rates were also calculated and compared to each other to  
verify the utility feasibilities of the codes.  
Keywords: Unfolding; Neutron fluence; Dose equivalent; Spectrum.  
1. INTRODUCTION  
Bonner sphere spectrometer (BSS) system is the most widely used for neutron spectrometry  
and dosimetry at many world-wide neutron laboratories. The BSS system normally consists of a  
thermal neutron detector and multiple Bonner spherical balls [1]. The reading   of a BSS ball at  
 
a specific distance from the source (which is obtained from a practical measurement, a common  
unit as “count per second, cps”) is the product of that ball’s response function,   (which is  
   
 
available from simulation, a common unit as “   ”) and an incident neutron spectrum,   (that is  
 
the distribution of neutron fluence rate as a function of incident neutron energy, a common unit  
      
as “       ”). The relationship can be expressed as shown in Eq.(1).  
 
∑           
(1)  
 
   
 
    
A series of   values as well as the values of   can be treated as inputs of an international  
 
   
commercial unfolding code in order to deduce the incident neutron spectrum,   which is a basic  
 
quantity to calculate other dosimetric quantities, i.e.,  
 
     
∑
(1) an integrated neutron fluence rate overall the spectrum,     
  , unit in  
 
      
“       ” (“   represents for different neutron regions: thermal,   ; epi-thermal,    ; and  
fast,  );  
 
∑
(2) a fractional neutron fluence rate in a specific energy region,     
  , unit in  
 
    
 
      
“       ” (    represents for the number of energy bins in the     region);  
 
̇
(
)
(3) a fractional neutron ambient dose equivalent rate in a specific energy region,        
 
 
   
∑
      , the unit can be converted to “       ” (  presents for a conversion factor  
 
 
    
 
converting a unit neutron fluence rate into a neutron ambient dose equivalent rate); and  
(4)  
a
)
neutron  
ambient  
)
dose  
equivalent  
rate  
overall  
the  
spectrum,  
 
 
   
 
̇
̇
(
 
(
∑
       
           unit can be converted to “       ”.  
     
In this work, various computer codes (i.e., FRUIT [2], MAXED [3], and GRAVEL [4])  
applying different algorithms were used to unfold the incident neutron spectrum,   based on the  
 
 
 
̇
̇
BSS measurements. The values of  ,   ,   (  ) and   (  ) were also calculated and  
compared to each other in order to confirm the proper operations of the three unfolding codes  
 
 
N. N. Quynh, …, L. N. Thiem, “Neutron spectrum unfolding … a comparison.”  
128  
Nghiên cứu khoa học công nghệ  
and the codes’ profound utility of authors in neutron spectrometry, dosimetry for radiation  
protection purposes.  
II. MATERIAL AND METHOD  
2.1. Neutron standard field  
Various neutron standard fields have been established at the Institute for Nuclear Science and  
Technology [5-8] in a room with inner dimensions of 7.0   x 7.0   x 7.0  . In this work, a  
    
simulated workplace neutron standard field of a  
        neutron source moderated using 30  
cm diameter polyethylene sphere was investigated at various distances from the source’s center  
7
    
[7]. The X14-type encapsulation  
 
        source with a neutron emission rate of 1.299 x 10  
   
(on Jan.23-2015, the expanded uncertainty of 2.9% with a confidence level of 95%) is  
tracable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, USA). More details of the  
neutron standard field can be found in previous works [6-8].  
2.2. Bonner sphere spectrometer system  
The BSS system consists of six spherical polyethylene moderators of different diameters (2,  
 
3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 inches) and a thermal neutron scintillator detector,     (considered as a  
“bare” BSS in Fig. 1). The response functions of the BSS sytem (  in Eq.(1)) were simulated  
   
using Monte Carlo N-Particle, version 6 (MCNP6). The newest neutron cross-section library  
(ENDF/B-VIII.0 [9]) and thermal neutron scattering cross-section data (h-poly.80t [10]) were  
used in MCNP6 simulations. More detailed information can be found in previous works [6-8].  
Each Bonner ball was used to measure the reading   (in Eq. (1)) at various distances in the  
 
neutron standard field. A series of   values of different Bonner balls at a specific distance were  
 
used in combination with the corresponding   values as inputs of international commercial  
   
computer codes to unfold the incident neutron spectrum.  
In this work, the MCNP6 code was also used for simulating the initial guesses of incident  
neutron spectrum solutions which are required in the MAXED and GRAVEL unfolding codes.  
2.3. Unfolding code  
Three different neutron spectrum unfolding codes with different algorithms were used to  
unfold the incident neutron spectra. The shapes of neutron spectra at a specific distance obtained  
from these three unfolding codes were then compared to each other to confirm their consistency.  
 FRUIT code  
The FRUIT unfolding code was developed by R. Bedogni [2] with a user-friendly graphical  
interface. Neutron spectrum unfolding method is based on a linear relationship model between  
four neutron spectra in different energy regions: thermal (  ), epi-thermal (   ), fast ( ), and  
high ( ) energetic neutrons, see Eq. (2) for more details.  
( )  
( )  
( ) ( )  
                      
 
( )  
                      
(2)  
 
      
    
    
 
 
 
( )  
Where,     is the thermal component with Maxellian distribution;   
( )  
  ,     ,  
( )  
   
    
 
( )  
    are the epi-thermal, fast, and high energetic components, respectively. The coefficients  
 
  ,   ,   , and   are the fractional contributions of corresponding components, which are  
   
    
 
 
found by the FRUIT code to deduce the final solution. In this work’s circumstance,   = 0 thus  
 
Eq. (2) can be rewritten as Eq. (3), if in which     represents for thermal, epi-thermal, and fast  
energetic neutrons.  
 
(3)  
( )  
      ∑       
 
 
 
     
Tạp chí Nghiên cứu KH&CN quân sự, Số 71, 02 - 2021  
129  
Vật lý  
 MAXED code  
The MAXED unfolding code was developed by M. Reginatto [3] based on the  
principle of maximum entropy. The final neutron spectrum,   in Eq. (1), is found so that the  
 
    
entropy,   in Eq. (4), reaches its maximum value. Where,   
is an initial guess neutron  
 
spectrum at ith energy bin, which is required as an input in the MAXED unfolding code. In this  
    
work, various   
values were obtained using MCNP6 simulations.  
 
 
 
    
 
      ∑ {     (  
)     
    }  
 
(4)  
 
    
 
 
 
 GRAVEL code  
The GRAVEL unfolding code applied the iterative algorithm to find out the final neutron  
   
   
   
spectrum [4]. The spectral neutron fluence   
at the   energy bin of the (     ) iteration  
 
   
was determined by the value of the   iteration following Eq. (5). Where,   is reading of  
 
detector  ;   is the response of detector   at the ith energy bin;   is a coefficient calculated at  
   
   
the Jth iteration of the detector   at the ith energy bin. The GRAVEL unfolding code also requires  
an initial guess neutron spectrum with non-negative values. These iterative procedures always  
lead to a non-negative solution spectrum which tends to have a better agreement between the  
unfolding solution and experimental data.  
 
      
   
 
∑
      (  
)
 
   
∑
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
(5)  
 
          
 
 
∑
 
 
   
(
)
3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION  
3.1. Neutron spectrum  
As results of the unfolding process using three unfolding codes (FRUIT, MAXED, and  
GRAVEL), the total neutron spectra of the 30 cm diameter polyethylene sphere moderated  
    
neutron standard field of the  
        source (at 100 cm, 150 cm, and 200 cm) were  
obtained, the spectra at 100 cm and 200 cm from the source are shown in Fig. (1).  
Figure 1. Neutron spectra of the 30 cm diameter polyethylene sphere moderated neutron  
standard field at 100 cm (left) and 200 cm (right) from the 241Am-Be source, obtained by  
different unfolding codes.  
N. N. Quynh, …, L. N. Thiem, “Neutron spectrum unfolding … a comparison.”  
130  
Nghiên cứu khoa học công nghệ  
There are three main regions of spectrum components (i.e., thermal, epi-thermal, and fast  
   
energetic neutrons). The thermal neutrons consider the energy region lower than    MeV  
caused by moderation process, the epi-thermal neutrons consider the energy region in the range  
   
   
from    to    MeV caused by the scattering process of neutrons with objects in the room,  
   
and fast neutrons consider the energy region from    to    MeV (in this work) representing  
    
the original spectrum of  
        source reduced by a further distance. From Fig. (1), ones  
can also figure out that there is a good agreement in unfolding spectra between the MAXED and  
GRAVEL while there is a slight difference between the results obtained from these two codes  
and that obtained from the FRUIT code.  
3.2. Neutron fluence rate  
Since the neutron spectra at three different distances (100, 150, and 200 cm) are available, the  
      
integrated and the fractional neutron fluence rates (unit in        ) are deduced (see the  
introduction section for more details). Those values from different unfolding codes are tabulated  
in Tab. 1. Ones can figure out that neutron fluence rates of different components are consistent to  
each other within 3%. That means three different unfolding codes are reliable for neutron safety  
assessment.  
      
Table 1. Neutron fluence rate (       ) of the overall spectrum ( ) and of the fractional  
regions: thermal (  ), epi-thermal (  ), and fast (  ) at various distances in the  
        neutron standard field of a 30 cm diameter spherical polyethylene moderator,  
   
    
 
    
obtained by different unfolding codes.  
100 cm  
150 cm  
200 cm  
Quantity  
FRUIT MAXED GRAVEL FRUIT MAXED GRAVEL FRUIT MAXED GRAVEL  
 
21.43  
18.90  
37.29  
77.61  
19.86  
18.32  
38.66  
76.84  
20.14 13.64  
18.00 11.74  
38.88 18.65  
77.03 44.02  
13.93  
11.70  
18.89  
44.52  
13.61 11.35  
11.48 9.37  
19.36 12.28  
44.45 33.00  
11.60  
9.24  
11.29  
9.26  
   
 
    
 
12.35  
33.19  
12.56  
33.11  
 
 
3.3. Neutron ambient dose equivalent rate  
Since the neutron spectra at three different distances (100, 150, and 200 cm) are available, the  
   
integrated and the fractional neutron ambient dose equivalent rates (unit in        ) are  
deduced based on ICRP 74 conversion coefficients converting from a unit neutron fluence rate to  
a neutron ambient dose equivalent rate [11]. Those values from different unfolding codes are  
tabulated in Tab. 2. Ones can figure out that neutron ambient dose equivalent rates of different  
components are consistent with each other within 3%. That means three different unfolding  
codes are reliable for neutron safety assessment.  
 
   
̇
(
)
Table 2. Neutron ambient dose equivalent rates (       ) of the overall spectrum,        
 
 
 
̇
̇
̇
(
 
(
)
(
) )  
and of the fractional regions: thermal,        epi-thermal,   
     and fast,      at  
   
    
    
various distances in the  
        neutron standard field of 30 cm diameter spherical  
polyethylene moderator, obtained by different unfolding codes.  
100 cm  
150 cm  
200 cm  
Quantity  
FRUIT MAXED GRAVEL FRUIT MAXED GRAVEL FRUIT MAXED GRAVEL  
 
̇
(
)
 
   
0.82  
1.03  
0.78  
1.03  
0.79 0.53  
1.02 0.60  
53.54 26.17  
55.34 27.29  
0.54  
0.65  
0.53 0.44  
0.64 0.50  
26.27 16.79  
27.44 17.73  
0.45  
0.51  
0.44  
0.52  
   
 
̇
(
)
   
 
    
 
̇
(
)
     
 
52.05  
53.90  
53.25  
55.06  
25.60  
26.79  
16.47  
17.43  
16.75  
17.70  
 
̇
( )  
   
 
Tạp chí Nghiên cứu KH&CN quân sự, Số 71, 02 - 2021  
131  
Vật lý  
4. CONCLUSION  
Three different neutron spectrum unfolding codes (FRUIT, MAXED, and GRAVEL) were  
applied to investigate dosimetric quantities (i.e., the shape of neutron spectrum, neutron fluence  
rate, and neutron ambient dose equivalent rate) of a moderated neutron standard field. The  
shapes of neutron spectra obtained from these three unfolding codes have a slight difference  
between those obtained from MAXED and GRAVEL and that obtained from FRUIT. However,  
the values of neutron fluence rates and neutron ambient dose equivalent rates are in good  
agreement within 3% between the results obtained from these three different unfolding codes.  
That means these three unfolding codes are reliable for neutron safety assessment for radiation  
protection purposes.  
Acknowledgment: The authors would like to sincerely thank Dr. Roberto Bedogni (National  
Laboratory of Frascati, Italy) who has approved the use of the FRUIT code. Dr. M. Reginatto (National  
Metrology Institute of Germany) is also highly appreciated for distributing to us the UMG package  
(containing MAXED and GRAVEL codes). This work was funded by Vietnam Ministry of Science and  
Technology through the supervision of the Vietnam Atomic Energy Institute via a research grant coded  
08/HĐ/ĐTCB.  
REFERENCES  
[1]. Cruzate, J.A., Carelli, J., Gregori, B.; “Bonner sphere spectrometer”. In: Workshop on  
Uncertainty Assessment in Computational Dosimetry: a Comparison of Approaches. Bologna,  
Italia, 8–10 October (2007).  
[2]. R. Bedogni, C. Domingo, A. Esposito, and F. Fern¡ndez, “FRUIT: An operational tool for  
multisphere neutron spectrometry in workplaces”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics  
Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol.  
580, no. 3, pp. 1301–1309(2007).  
[3]. M. Reginatto and P. Goldhagen, “MAXED, a computer code for maximum entropy  
deconvolution of multisphere nơtron spectrometer data”, Health Physics, Vol. 77(5), pp. 579–  
583(1999).  
[4]. M. Matzke, “Unfolding of pulse height spectra: The HEPRO program system”, Physikalisch-  
Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Tech. Rep.(1994).  
    
[5]. Ngoc-Thiem Le et al.; “Neutron calibration field of a bare  
Engineering and Technology; Vol. 49, pp. 277–284 (2017).  
   source in Vietnam”. Nuclear  
    
[6]. Ngoc-Thiem Le et al.; “Characterization of a neutron calibration field with  
        source  
using Bonner sphere spectrometer”. Applied Radiation and Isotopes; Vol. 133, pp. 68–74  
(2018).  
    
[7]. Ngoc-Thiem Le et al.; “Simulated workplace neutron fields of  
        source moderated  
by polyethylene spheres”; Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry; Vol. 321(1), pp.  
313–321 (2019).  
[8]. Ngoc-Thiem Le; “Establishment of Neutron Reference Fields in Vietnam: A Review”;  
Philippine Journal of Science; Vol. 149 (3-a), pp. 947-954, (2020).  
[9]. D.A. Brown, M.B. Chadwick et al., “NDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th Major Release of the Nuclear  
Reaction Data Library with CIELO-project Cross Sections”, New Standards and Thermal  
Scattering Data, Nuclear Data Sheets, vol. 148, pp. 1-142, 2018  
[10].Parsons, Donald Kent, “NJOY Processing of ENDF/B VIII.0 Thermal Scattering Files”, LA-  
UR-18-25096, 2018.  
[11].ICRP, “1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection”,  
Annals of the ICRP, vol. 21, 1991.  
N. N. Quynh, …, L. N. Thiem, “Neutron spectrum unfolding … a comparison.”  
132  
Nghiên cứu khoa học công nghệ  
TÓM TẮT  
TÁCH PHỔ THÔNG LƯỢNG NEUTRON SỬ DỤNG  
CÁC PHẦN MỀM MÁY TÍNH KHÁC NHAU: SO SÁNH  
Các đại lượng đo liều tại các khoảng cách khác nhau trong trường chuẩn liều neutron  
của nguồn 241Am-Be được làm chậm bởi quả cầu polyethylene đường kính 30 cm đã được  
nghiên cứu bởi hệ phổ kế cầu Bonner. Thêm vào đó, các phần mềm thương mại quốc tế  
dùng trong tách phổ thông lượng neutron được sử dụng để thu được phổ thông lượng  
neutron trong trường chuẩn, dạng phổ thông lượng neutron trong trường chuẩn được so  
sánh với nhau giữa các kết quả nhận được bởi các phần mềm tách phổ khác nhau. Thông  
lượng neutron toàn phổ và thông lượng neutron từng phần cũng được tính toán và so sánh  
với nhau giữa các kết quả nhận được bởi các phần mềm tách phổ khác nhau. Đại lượng  
quan trọng trong đánh giá an toàn bức xạ đối với neutron là tương đương liều neutron  
môi trường cũng được tính toán và so sánh giữa các kết quả nhận được bởi các phần mềm  
tách phổ khác nhau để khẳng định khả năng hoạt động chính xác của các phần mềm tách  
phổ này.  
Từ khóa: Tách; Thông lượng neutron; Tương đương liều; Phổ.  
Received 12th November 2020  
Revised 10th December 2020  
Accepted 5th January 2021  
Author affiliations:  
1Institute for Nuclear Science and Technology; 179 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Hanoi;  
2Hanoi Oncology Hospital; 42A Thanh Nhan, Hai Ba Trung, Hanoi;  
3Vietnam Agency for Radiation and Nuclear Safety; 113 Tran Duy Hung, Hanoi.  
*Corresponding author: [email protected].  
Tạp chí Nghiên cứu KH&CN quân sự, Số 71, 02 - 2021  
133  
pdf 6 trang yennguyen 22060 Free
Bạn đang xem tài liệu "Neutron spectrum unfolding using various computer codes: A comparison", để tải tài liệu gốc về máy hãy click vào nút Download ở trên

File đính kèm:

  • pdfneutron_spectrum_unfolding_using_various_computer_codes_a_co.pdf